Started By
Message
locked post

Charcoal or Gas?

Posted on 4/29/09 at 1:47 am
Posted by slaughlin
North Dad Gum Louisiana
Member since Apr 2008
3198 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 1:47 am
I have owned charcoal grills for years, never succumbing to the temptation to get quick results. I have always thought charcoal grilled food tasted better.

I'm in the market for a new grill, and for the first time I am tempted to buy a gas grill. Help me out: what are the pro's/con's of gas and charcoal? I will follow our hallowed board's advice.
Posted by Dalai Lama
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2006
2033 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 2:46 am to
I go with gas. Its just so much easier. It doesn't have the smoky taste of the charcoal, but for everyday, quick meals it does the job just fine.


However, I do want to try a Big Green Egg and see what all the fuss is about.
Posted by Tortilla Tiger
Kansas City, KS
Member since Jan 2005
284 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 3:45 am to
I go with Charcoal for steaks and Traeger for just about everything else. I just can't do the gas anymore after charcoal and wood pellets. My brother has the Green Egg and it rocks - great grill but I love my Traeger.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52175 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 5:23 am to
I use charcoal and/or hardwood. I don't care to use gas.
Posted by Eddie Vedder
The South Plains
Member since Jan 2006
4438 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 6:27 am to
i use charcoal and very much prefer it to gas. for me, charcoal provides a better flavor.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70159 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 6:58 am to
Not only do i think charcoal tastes better, i love the feeling of stacking, lighter fluid, let my neighbors get jealous as they smell the smoke, break down the pile at the right time, wait a few more minutes while me and my buddies talk about what a good fire it is, then cook to perfection.
Posted by GarmischTiger
Humboldt County
Member since Mar 2007
6849 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 6:59 am to
Nothing beats charcoal: the even heat, the ability to go indirect and control heat with air, hell...even the process of loading the chimney, lighting it, waiting for the coals to get hot while sucking on beers...it can't be beat.

But gas has it's place. It's good because it's fast...and sometime you need fast. I would recommend doing your research and not going cheap. Gas grills tend to have cool spots. Webers have a good reputation (go figure) - the ones I've cooked on were hot corner-to-corner, but they're on the pricey end.
Posted by Auburntiger
BTR area
Member since Mar 2005
14488 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Not only do i think charcoal tastes better, i love the feeling of stacking, lighter fluid, let my neighbors get jealous as they smell the smoke, break down the pile at the right time, wait a few more minutes while me and my buddies talk about what a good fire it is, then cook to perfection




I actually have a charcoal and a gas grill. If time is a factor I cook on the gas grill......if I am more concerned about taste, etc. I go with the ol' charcoal grill....
Posted by CC
Galveztown
Member since Feb 2004
15138 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 8:10 am to
I have both and use the gas for slow cooking, rotisserie and veggies because i can control the temps better. If I want that smokey taste i add wood chips to a smoker box. The charcoal is great for steaks, burgers and chicken but I wouldn't want to do without my gas grill.
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
22248 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 8:11 am to
i always preferred charcoal. however, they did a survey and they voted that beef was better on charcoal and that pork was better on gas. i thought it would have been opposite.


Posted by JustSmokin
Member since Sep 2007
9162 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 8:29 am to
The correct answer is to own both. You can't duplicate the taste of charcoal, but time or weather doesn't always allow breaking out the charcoal pit. Gas is a great alternative.

I can cook steaks on my gas grill during the week in the time it would take me to light the charcoal pit. Very little clean up. I don't have to battle the weather during the winter.

But when I have the time and the weather cooperates, it's the charcoal pit every time.





Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116684 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 10:45 am to
I'm a charcoal only person. Do any of you use lump? It seems to get a little hotter per amount.
Posted by CPT 8ch
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2007
293 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:01 pm to
Overall, you can't beat charcoal; however, for grilling (not Bar-B-Q'ing) burgers, fish, boneless chicken, steaks, etc., I really like my gas grill.

You can't just buy a cheap grill though. I have a Ducane which is not the very best, but it is quite good. I've found that a few hundred extra dollars is well worth it when purchasing a gas grill.
Posted by Coon
La 56 Southbound
Member since Feb 2005
18563 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:16 pm to
Gas connected to your house’s natural gas is hard to beat. And I really don’t see what all the fuss is about concerning charcoal. You want smoke flavor? Just get some wood chips and throw em in a smoke box. Bam.

During the summer I cook on my grill probably 4+ nights a week and at least two nights during the winter. I don’t see the need to spend an extra hour of starting and cleanup + mess every time I cook
Posted by Eddie Vedder
The South Plains
Member since Jan 2006
4438 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

I don’t see the need to spend an extra hour of starting and cleanup + mess every time I cook


this is a bit exaggerated. it takes 15/20 tops to light my charcoal and have it in the pit. if you use a chimney, it is simple and fast.

i do agree that gas has a role. but, most of what i do is BBQ (indirect heat/smoke) not grilling. there is no substitute for charcoal/lump if you are BBQing.

even when i grill, i don't mind lighting the charcoal. to me, it is just part of the process; sitting outside, beer in hand, smelling the coals as they catch fire. i don't want to trade that experience for speed/convenience.
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 12:22 pm
Posted by Coon
La 56 Southbound
Member since Feb 2005
18563 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:27 pm to
without discussing "feelings" there's little difference until you get to huge tow behind log burning bbq's used in cook-offs.
Posted by Eddie Vedder
The South Plains
Member since Jan 2006
4438 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

without discussing "feelings" there's little difference until you get to huge tow behind log burning bbq's used in cook-offs.


so, are you suggesting that BBQing ribs, brisket, or pork butt on a gas grill (which really isn't BBQ at all), in your mind, is the equivalent to cooking them on, say, a Weber Kettle using indirect heat and charcoal? if so, there is no way i believe that.
This post was edited on 4/29/09 at 12:33 pm
Posted by Coon
La 56 Southbound
Member since Feb 2005
18563 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:38 pm to
tell me the dif:

smoke: both
temp: same
indirect heat: same
...
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9526 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:45 pm to
You can technically bbq on a gas grill as long as you add wood chips. I prefer charcoal myself. I have a Weber Performer that comes with a gas assist to light the coals and an ash sweeper to dispose of the ashes. To me nothing is more satisfying than tending to a bed of charcoal to keep my temps where I want them. And the taste can't be compared.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
52570 posts
Posted on 4/29/09 at 12:46 pm to
I use to say charcoal but I've moved on and gas is much easier and it can cook your steak perfect
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram