Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Which L.A.B. putter?

Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:22 am
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4408 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:22 am
I “think” I won a LAB putter of my choice from a Masters contest.
Received a notification, but I’m not sure yet.

NOTHING official until this week. 2nd Swing golf, so should be legit. (?)

Got me thinking, I have no idea which LAB I would even consider. I have never held one or putted with one. I currently use a Bettinardi Mallet.
Funny, I asked Ai and it suggested the DF3, which would be the easiest transition from what I have to a ZT-styled putter. Get to choose shaft, length, grip, offset, etc.

Which LAB would you choose and why?
Posted by Monahans
Member since Sep 2019
2343 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:33 am to
I'd get fit if thats part of the package. DF3 seems the most attractive to me but if I were getting one Id let the fitter decide.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
41984 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:23 am to
Df3 is the most popular model. A lot more options now than there used to be.

Do you like a "hot" face or more of a dull feel? The inserts have a hotter face and jump off the face more. i play on really fast greens so I use the standard/non insert face. i like the feel.

The DF models look like a toilet (self admitted by LAB, they joke about the looks) but it is an alignment dream for many. I liked the look of the Mezz max at adress best so i went with that. The OZ is the most traditional looking mallet for sure. Then you have the Links that are more blade style.

Add now that you can get the OZ and Links in "heel shaft" now instead of center shaft if you want a more standard looking putter.

I think it'd be worth your time going to a store that has them and put with a few to see which ones you like.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
26401 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 5:52 am to
The new "traditional blade" looks intriguing.

I couldn't put with any other the original hosel designs. The HS was okay, but not as good as a design as the Evnroll's IMO.

Would game the new ones if I figured out where to test one.
Posted by dek81572
Bossier City
Member since Apr 2012
1476 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:41 am to
I have the DF3, best money I ever spent on a golf club
Posted by MakersMark
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
683 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:54 am to
I have the OZ1i and love it.
Posted by Jon A thon
Member since May 2019
2505 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 2:19 pm to
I played around with all that I could get my hands on. I was back and forth between the OZ1 and DF3. I was used to a mallet, so had no desire to go with the blade version. The MEZZ was only available in broomstick style at the shops I stopped at, so didn't get a good feel for it, but also didn't do anything for me to the point that I wanted to find a way to try it with a standard shaft/grip to try out.

Fundamentally there were two things that made me keep going back and forth. The OZ.1i had the insert and I wasn't sure if I wanted that or not. Greens can get super fast where I'm a member, so decided against that (DF3 is now available with insert anyway). Second, I wasn't sure I wanted to dive into the odd looks of the DF3. This seems to be the primary market segment for the OZ.1. I got over the looks and like the ball picker on the DF3 . So ended up with that. I think I have a little more confidence in it's stability that the OZ.1. But there doesn't seem to be a big difference there and is down to preference.
Posted by BYEUBAW
Member since Jan 2024
128 posts
Posted on 4/15/26 at 3:59 pm to
Loving the DF3i improved lag putting over the DF3 by a large percentage, try them all and see what fits you best.
Posted by LSUStjames
Member since Dec 2005
3533 posts
Posted on 4/16/26 at 1:28 pm to
DF3i with the insert.

The regular DF3 doesn't come off hot enough and is easy to leave lag putts short. I went with Oz.1i because of that. DF3i was not out then or I would have went with that.

Go watch Horvat's latest videos, that putter has helped him a ton.
Posted by GirthBrooks62
The Booty House
Member since Oct 2017
1279 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 7:53 am to
I’ve owned about six different L.A.B. Golf putters at this point including a Counterbalance DF3 with an Accra shaft, Counterbalance Mezz with an Accra shaft, Broomstick Mezz, DF2.1 in both standard and armlock, DF3 armlock, and the original Link.1 so I’ve had a pretty complete run through the lineup.

If you are serious about performance, custom is the way to go. Getting fit for lie angle and upgrading to the Accra shaft makes a noticeable difference in consistency and face control. One thing that catches a lot of people off guard is head weight when transitioning to a zero torque design. Coming from a traditional torque putter, the head can feel unusually light at first. That sensation is not actually about weight but about the absence of torque that your hands are used to feeling during the stroke. If you prefer a heavier and more stable feel, it makes sense to go with a heavier head option from the start so you do not go through the full custom process only to realize the feel is not what you expected. Custom builds typically take about a month unless you pay for expedited production and shipping, so getting that decision right upfront matters.

The transition to zero balance is faster than most people think. With consistent weekend play and some focused practice, it usually takes about two to three weeks to feel natural. The key is committing to the change and not bouncing back and forth between putters because that slows down the adjustment.

For most golfers, the DF3 is the best off the rack option. It provides a high level of forgiveness without the extreme look that some of the other heads have. The DF2.1 is still the most forgiving head they make and truly feels like the putter is locked on rails, but the DF3 is easier to manage when it comes to pace and distance control on longer putts.

Face, feel, look and sound differences are worth understanding because they are very distinct across the lineup. The Mezz has a more clicky sound and a firmer feel assuming the standard non insert face, and visually it is most similar to a fanged Scotty Cameron style mallet. The DF3 has a very soft feel with the same non insert assumption and gives you comparable forgiveness in a cleaner and less intimidating shape, which makes it easier to transition from a traditional mallet. The DF2.1 is the original design and has a more pronounced ping or almost gong like sound that reminds you of an old school Ping putter, and it truly feels like the putter is doing the work for you with the lowest torque profile of the group. The Link.1 is best compared to a traditional blade like a Scotty Cameron rather than a mallet, but it is significantly more stable than anything in that category. The difference in torque profile between a Scotty blade and the Link.1 is substantial, with Scotty being on the higher torque end of the spectrum, so moving into a Link.1 is a noticeable shift even within blade style putters.

If I were recommending one setup, it would come down to a standard or counterbalance DF3 based on personal preference. If you like a firmer feel with a little more pop off the face, I would go with the insert option. It produces a bit more rollout so you do not need as long of a stroke for comparable distance. I do not currently have the insert, but it is the next version I plan to add.

At the end of the day, practice is always required no matter what putter you use. I would recommend incorporating drills like the thumbs off drill, which you can find on YouTube, along with using a putting board to dial in your setup and ball position. With L.A.B. putters, the ball generally needs to be played slightly more forward in your stance, closer to your left pinky toe. The goal is to develop a consistent square to path stroke, which is what L.A.B. is referring to when they say the face stays square. If your setup or path is off, you will negate the benefit of the technology. These putters are very natural and intuitive once you get used to them, but they are different from what most golfers have used before, so it takes a reasonable amount of time and focused practice to fully unlock the performance.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 8:05 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram