- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
THR: 'Supergirl’ Star Milly Alcock Just Proved Her Point About Fan Backlash
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:04 pm
quote:
It’s all so ironic that it almost seems too obvious to point out how ironic it is: Alcock says women in fantasy franchise IPs get backlash and rude comments about their looks and the result is backlash and rude comments about her looks.
One gripe being made by some fans is that whenever a project isn’t successful and has a female or Black lead — especially titles made by Disney — that those creatively responsible suggest fans were too sexist or racist to appreciate their efforts. But Alcock never even suggested Supergirl would get backlash, only that she expects to get personally objectified and trolled (which … she is).
Others counter that some female action icons in the past have universal acceptance, like Sigourney Weaver in Aliens and Linda Hamilton in Terminator 2. But it’s rather easy to cite legendary performances from decades ago and say: Look how accepting we are. It’s true that the quality of Supergirl and Alcock’s performance will determine its legacy more than anything else. But Alcock was mainly talking about the downside of her experience on House of the Dragon — where her performance and the first season were acclaimed, yet she still endured plenty of trolling.
Attempts out there to lump in Alcock with Snow White star Zegler and ousted Scream franchise star Melissa Barrera are interesting because they speak to something broader: Young women in franchise roles tend to receive outsized “STFU” backlash.
It’s about proportionality: The level of vitriol that seems to accompany young female actors not saying precisely the “right” thing, and how such backlash often gets weaponized along with critiques about their looks. Another young fantasy franchise lead, The Last of Us star Bella Ramsey, has managed to not say anything particularly controversial, yet still received a level of online bullying during season two last year that was outright grotesque (one might say they were ridiculed for “just existing”).
This isn’t a “right wing fans are all toxic” argument, either. While not a fantasy franchise star, the most bashed actor last year was Sydney Sweeney for being presumed to be conservative, all while insisting she’s “not a political person” and otherwise trying to avoid saying anything controversial at all. Sweeney was even labeled a Nazi by some on the left for appearing in a wink-wink jeans ad (“MAGA Barbie” read a USA Today headline). Did her looks play a role in this? Of course. Has Chris Pratt — who likewise seems to lean vaguely conservative — ever received the level of nuclear blowback Sweeney did? Not at all.
quote:
It’s a circular trap: Studios want young female stars to be hugely popular on social media and seem relatable and authentic. But you can’t be popular, relatable and authentic and also be boring. But to not be boring, you have to say or do interesting things that won’t please everybody. But if you say or do things not everybody likes, you will get backlash from … somewhere. And if you’re a young woman — particularly one navigating comic or fantasy franchise IPs — that backlash is likely going to be loud. (And heaven help you if you happen to be remotely feminist or political, in either direction, and express that).
And the idea that a young actress doing dozens of interviews promoting a project and also interacting with fans on social media might say one thing that could spark outrage? That’s not something that’s merely possible, but inevitable. Just how boring, exactly, do we want our stars to be?
LINK
Does the writer have a point?
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:11 pm to RLDSC FAN
So tiresome.
Make a good movie and people will watch it.
Make a good movie and people will watch it.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:12 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Just Proved Her Point About Fan Backlash
1. Intentionally antagonize people
2. People get annoyed
3. OMG SEE I JUST PROVED MY POINT.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:13 pm to boxcarbarney
Yeah, WB has to be pissed that this is happening 
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:16 pm to RLDSC FAN
Of course the writer has a point. Half the box office would disappear if the lead actress was ugly. It is what it is. She didn't even get mad at that fact. She accepted it in stride and still she receives backlash.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:21 pm to StansberryRules
quote:4. Start another thread on it.
1. Intentionally antagonize people
2. People get annoyed
3. OMG SEE I JUST PROVED MY POINT.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:27 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Black
Stopped reading. The word black should not be capitalized in the middle of a sentence.
quote:
Does the writer have a point?
No
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:42 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Does the writer have a point?
None that exists in the article.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:46 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Does the writer have a point?
Yes.
A retarded one.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:52 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
'Supergirl’ Star Milly Alcock Just Proved Her Point About Fan Backlash
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:58 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
Of course the writer has a point. Half the box office would disappear if the lead actress was ugly. It is what it is. She didn't even get mad at that fact. She accepted it in stride and still she receives backlash.
It's not about her, as an individual, it's about an established IP, Supergiri, who has been a well known and accepted character in comics and screen.
She went after this part, got it, and by most accounts I know, is being well received. What criticisms that have been raised aren't about HER, but the angsty, I'm a messy girl, 'woe is me' attitude for how James Gunn and the director Craig Gillespie have chosen for Supergirl.
I think it's far more likely the studio preemptively put this 'backlash' crap out as a means to make waves for a movie that they know might not do well at the box office.
See 'Reva' from Kenobi, see Snow Brown, see black Ariel, see Snape Dogg, see hobbits, elves and dwarves of colour, etc..
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:00 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
What criticisms that have been raised aren't about HER, but the angsty, I'm a messy girl, 'woe is me' attitude for how James Gunn and the director Craig Gillespie have chosen for Supergirl.
It's an adaptation of a very popular comic book series
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:20 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
"very popular"
Maybe with the critics, but it was a short, 8 issue series run, from 2021-22. Not exactly a wildly popular 'classic'.
Maybe if Gunn's DC verse wasn't based on his own dog, how he personally views farmers in fly over country or see Kara as an onscreen projection insert for his own 'messy' wife, he'd have drawn in a wider audience.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:28 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
on his own dog
I agree that they're overdoing it with the dog
quote:
he'd have drawn in a wider audience.
Superman did fine.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:42 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
4. Start another thread on it.
For someone who hates these threads, you sure post in all of them.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:49 pm to RLDSC FAN
Saw a tweet today that basically summed it up, this conversation alone tells you that Supergirl is about to mega-flop.
I haven't bothered to check what the supposed early tracking numbers are or whatever but whenever the bulk of the conversation leading upt hte release of a movie has been about the "toxic fans" and the poor besieged actresses the bomb rate is pretty much 100%.
I can't think of a movie where all the buzz before hand was negativity social issue/feminist crap and then the movie went on to be a big box office success.
I haven't bothered to check what the supposed early tracking numbers are or whatever but whenever the bulk of the conversation leading upt hte release of a movie has been about the "toxic fans" and the poor besieged actresses the bomb rate is pretty much 100%.
I can't think of a movie where all the buzz before hand was negativity social issue/feminist crap and then the movie went on to be a big box office success.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:57 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
haven't bothered to check what the supposed early tracking numbers are
It doesn't open until June 26th, so still a ways to go before ticket sales start
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:26 pm to StansberryRules
quote:Yep. Everything is a publicity stunt now.
1. Intentionally antagonize people
2. People get annoyed
3. OMG SEE I JUST PROVED MY POINT.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:32 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
But it’s rather easy to cite legendary performances from decades ago
It's because the actors didn't call you a sexist for not watching a movie back then.
Popular
Back to top

14












