Started By
Message

THR: 'Supergirl’ Star Milly Alcock Just Proved Her Point About Fan Backlash

Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:04 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59788 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:04 pm
quote:

It’s all so ironic that it almost seems too obvious to point out how ironic it is: Alcock says women in fantasy franchise IPs get backlash and rude comments about their looks and the result is backlash and rude comments about her looks.

One gripe being made by some fans is that whenever a project isn’t successful and has a female or Black lead — especially titles made by Disney — that those creatively responsible suggest fans were too sexist or racist to appreciate their efforts. But Alcock never even suggested Supergirl would get backlash, only that she expects to get personally objectified and trolled (which … she is).

Others counter that some female action icons in the past have universal acceptance, like Sigourney Weaver in Aliens and Linda Hamilton in Terminator 2. But it’s rather easy to cite legendary performances from decades ago and say: Look how accepting we are. It’s true that the quality of Supergirl and Alcock’s performance will determine its legacy more than anything else. But Alcock was mainly talking about the downside of her experience on House of the Dragon — where her performance and the first season were acclaimed, yet she still endured plenty of trolling.

Attempts out there to lump in Alcock with Snow White star Zegler and ousted Scream franchise star Melissa Barrera are interesting because they speak to something broader: Young women in franchise roles tend to receive outsized “STFU” backlash.

It’s about proportionality: The level of vitriol that seems to accompany young female actors not saying precisely the “right” thing, and how such backlash often gets weaponized along with critiques about their looks. Another young fantasy franchise lead, The Last of Us star Bella Ramsey, has managed to not say anything particularly controversial, yet still received a level of online bullying during season two last year that was outright grotesque (one might say they were ridiculed for “just existing”).

This isn’t a “right wing fans are all toxic” argument, either. While not a fantasy franchise star, the most bashed actor last year was Sydney Sweeney for being presumed to be conservative, all while insisting she’s “not a political person” and otherwise trying to avoid saying anything controversial at all. Sweeney was even labeled a Nazi by some on the left for appearing in a wink-wink jeans ad (“MAGA Barbie” read a USA Today headline). Did her looks play a role in this? Of course. Has Chris Pratt — who likewise seems to lean vaguely conservative — ever received the level of nuclear blowback Sweeney did? Not at all.


quote:

It’s a circular trap: Studios want young female stars to be hugely popular on social media and seem relatable and authentic. But you can’t be popular, relatable and authentic and also be boring. But to not be boring, you have to say or do interesting things that won’t please everybody. But if you say or do things not everybody likes, you will get backlash from … somewhere. And if you’re a young woman — particularly one navigating comic or fantasy franchise IPs — that backlash is likely going to be loud. (And heaven help you if you happen to be remotely feminist or political, in either direction, and express that).

And the idea that a young actress doing dozens of interviews promoting a project and also interacting with fans on social media might say one thing that could spark outrage? That’s not something that’s merely possible, but inevitable. Just how boring, exactly, do we want our stars to be?



LINK

Does the writer have a point?
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 4:07 pm
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
26362 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:11 pm to
So tiresome.

Make a good movie and people will watch it.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4975 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Just Proved Her Point About Fan Backlash


1. Intentionally antagonize people
2. People get annoyed
3. OMG SEE I JUST PROVED MY POINT.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59788 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:13 pm to
Yeah, WB has to be pissed that this is happening
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
3054 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:16 pm to
Of course the writer has a point. Half the box office would disappear if the lead actress was ugly. It is what it is. She didn't even get mad at that fact. She accepted it in stride and still she receives backlash.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38289 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

1. Intentionally antagonize people
2. People get annoyed
3. OMG SEE I JUST PROVED MY POINT.
4. Start another thread on it.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
64733 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Black


Stopped reading. The word black should not be capitalized in the middle of a sentence.

quote:

Does the writer have a point?


No
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46006 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Does the writer have a point?


None that exists in the article.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114504 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Does the writer have a point?


Yes.

A retarded one.
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18752 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

'Supergirl’ Star Milly Alcock Just Proved Her Point About Fan Backlash



Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46006 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Of course the writer has a point. Half the box office would disappear if the lead actress was ugly. It is what it is. She didn't even get mad at that fact. She accepted it in stride and still she receives backlash.


It's not about her, as an individual, it's about an established IP, Supergiri, who has been a well known and accepted character in comics and screen.

She went after this part, got it, and by most accounts I know, is being well received. What criticisms that have been raised aren't about HER, but the angsty, I'm a messy girl, 'woe is me' attitude for how James Gunn and the director Craig Gillespie have chosen for Supergirl.

I think it's far more likely the studio preemptively put this 'backlash' crap out as a means to make waves for a movie that they know might not do well at the box office.

See 'Reva' from Kenobi, see Snow Brown, see black Ariel, see Snape Dogg, see hobbits, elves and dwarves of colour, etc..
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59788 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

What criticisms that have been raised aren't about HER, but the angsty, I'm a messy girl, 'woe is me' attitude for how James Gunn and the director Craig Gillespie have chosen for Supergirl.


It's an adaptation of a very popular comic book series
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46006 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

"very popular"



Maybe with the critics, but it was a short, 8 issue series run, from 2021-22. Not exactly a wildly popular 'classic'.

Maybe if Gunn's DC verse wasn't based on his own dog, how he personally views farmers in fly over country or see Kara as an onscreen projection insert for his own 'messy' wife, he'd have drawn in a wider audience.

Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59788 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

on his own dog


I agree that they're overdoing it with the dog

quote:

he'd have drawn in a wider audience.


Superman did fine.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46006 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

did fine.


Posted by Kinderman
Member since Oct 2023
1397 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

4. Start another thread on it.

For someone who hates these threads, you sure post in all of them.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4975 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:49 pm to
Saw a tweet today that basically summed it up, this conversation alone tells you that Supergirl is about to mega-flop.

I haven't bothered to check what the supposed early tracking numbers are or whatever but whenever the bulk of the conversation leading upt hte release of a movie has been about the "toxic fans" and the poor besieged actresses the bomb rate is pretty much 100%.

I can't think of a movie where all the buzz before hand was negativity social issue/feminist crap and then the movie went on to be a big box office success.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59788 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

haven't bothered to check what the supposed early tracking numbers are


It doesn't open until June 26th, so still a ways to go before ticket sales start
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
64923 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

1. Intentionally antagonize people
2. People get annoyed
3. OMG SEE I JUST PROVED MY POINT.
Yep. Everything is a publicity stunt now.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
88702 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

But it’s rather easy to cite legendary performances from decades ago



It's because the actors didn't call you a sexist for not watching a movie back then.




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram