- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CWD and Deer Farming- Meeting moved to April 8th
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:23 am
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:23 am
Apparently there's a meeting that's been rescheduled from today to April 8th. I couldn't find much on LDWF website but found out a little information from Whitetails of Louisiana below. Apparently the LDWF is trying to take over regulating deer farming from the AG department. I don't have a dog in this race but was interested in what you guys thought. Obviously the deer pen folks are upset.
What side of the fence are you on?
From Whitetails of LA-
The CWD Task Force meeting that was scheduled for April 1, 2026 has been moved to April 8, 2026 @ 1:30pm in the committee room 3 at the Louisiana State Capitol in Baton Rouge, LA. This meeting will include voting on recommendations from LDWF and LWF that will hinder how we farm. We as an industry need to show up in force.
For more information please contact a board member or
Myra Bollinger at whitetailsoflouisiana@gmail.com or 985-892-0056 ext. 1225 (office)
What side of the fence are you on?
From Whitetails of LA-
The CWD Task Force meeting that was scheduled for April 1, 2026 has been moved to April 8, 2026 @ 1:30pm in the committee room 3 at the Louisiana State Capitol in Baton Rouge, LA. This meeting will include voting on recommendations from LDWF and LWF that will hinder how we farm. We as an industry need to show up in force.
For more information please contact a board member or
Myra Bollinger at whitetailsoflouisiana@gmail.com or 985-892-0056 ext. 1225 (office)
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:50 am to JDPndahizzy
I'll probably get crushed for this but I don't personally believe whitetail deer should ever be farmed like cattle. Doing so has quietly eroded some of the non hunting publics perceptions of hunters and how they go about pursuing deer. When I say non hunting, I'm referring to folks who at some point didn't really have an opinion about hunting, one way or the other. They didn't participate in it, nor were they card carrying members of PETA, set on stopping all hunting.
That's the most important demographic of Americans when it comes to maintaining our right to hunt. They represent the largest number of the three groups (hunters, non hunters, non hunting activist)
And while I'm sure a majority of deer breeders try and run their operations by the book, we know for a fact that many don't. We know that whitetail bucks are sold to be hunted in small high fence areas, across state lines, which is illegal.
We know there is an increased risk of disease in pen raised deer.
We know deer are difficult to handle in captivity, making them susceptible to injury.
We know that high density farming can hurt local ecosystems.
Lastly, here's a quote from a Texas farmer speaking about the growers association he belongs to....."Our members provide a service for hunters who may not have the time necessary to have a successful hunt or access to quality land. These ranches offer a quality hunt, which is what everyone wants, isn't it?"
That's not hunting, that's killing, and that's something we've recently lost sight of.
That's the most important demographic of Americans when it comes to maintaining our right to hunt. They represent the largest number of the three groups (hunters, non hunters, non hunting activist)
And while I'm sure a majority of deer breeders try and run their operations by the book, we know for a fact that many don't. We know that whitetail bucks are sold to be hunted in small high fence areas, across state lines, which is illegal.
We know there is an increased risk of disease in pen raised deer.
We know deer are difficult to handle in captivity, making them susceptible to injury.
We know that high density farming can hurt local ecosystems.
Lastly, here's a quote from a Texas farmer speaking about the growers association he belongs to....."Our members provide a service for hunters who may not have the time necessary to have a successful hunt or access to quality land. These ranches offer a quality hunt, which is what everyone wants, isn't it?"
That's not hunting, that's killing, and that's something we've recently lost sight of.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:53 am to JDPndahizzy
Once the fence goes up, the deer are no longer wildlife and become an agricultural product.
I'd imagine LDWF would like to have the same sort of jurisdiction and sampling control that they have in the wild populations, but they would be destroying private property to do so.
I'd imagine LDWF would like to have the same sort of jurisdiction and sampling control that they have in the wild populations, but they would be destroying private property to do so.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:19 am to JDPndahizzy
I want to see data showing the CWD state agency actions are having a positive affect
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:21 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
I want to see data showing the CWD state agency actions are having a positive affect
Here's you waiting on that....

Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:23 am to JDPndahizzy
I see alot of state overreach and scare tactics, but I don’t see a lot of improvement and benefit
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:54 pm to geauxbrown
Hi fence deer are just jacking off, wild deer are the real thing.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 3:32 pm to JDPndahizzy
A lot of talking heads that make tons of money from the deer industry (Dr Deer, etc) bash all the agencies for what they do. However they never come out and give their suggestions on what needs to be done
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:15 pm to geauxbrown
Delete
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:31 pm to ecb
nm
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:44 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:this is the only goal
I see alot of state overreach and scare tactics,
Posted on 4/2/26 at 7:51 pm to Jack Daniel
Positive effect compared to what? Can you point to an agency that has done “good?”
No one knows what success looks like in the world with CWD. NW AR shows us what failure looks like… what too little and too late looks like. We’re not there yet. That seems good and positive.
No one knows what success looks like in the world with CWD. NW AR shows us what failure looks like… what too little and too late looks like. We’re not there yet. That seems good and positive.
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 4/2/26 at 9:09 pm to turkish
Why’d the baws allow deer farming to begin with?
Posted on 4/2/26 at 9:47 pm to White Bear
Well, it’s a tough one. A man should be able to exercise his rights on his own property. When the existence/health wildlife held in public trust are at risk, though….
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:01 pm to JDPndahizzy
My 2 cents.
I don't clam to be an expert but I do have some training at the college level in wildlife management. My major was forestry.
Anyway nobody seems to have an iron clad idea of exactly what is going on with CWD but I am very hopeful. Especially in the south and strange as it may seem deer farms might actually be part of the answer... especially if you live further north.
I adhere to the theory (not my theory, I didn't start this theory) that the deer in the southeast are much less susceptible to CWD than northern deer. The bad outbreaks do not seem to be in the south.
For instance. Mississippi has CWD and with very little action the percentage of infections doesn't seem to be increasing. They liberalized hunting regulations and banned baiting. But I personally do not believe those regulations are what is responsible for the frequency of infection staying mostly flat
There is research being done to identify genes that provide RESISTENCE to CWD. Resistance... NOT immunity.
Resistance is huge. Deer do not live for long periods of time. So you you just delay the average age of contracting the disease then you can significantly reduce the impact on the age structure of your deer herd (trophy potential).
Researchers have identified a number of genes that they think reduce the susceptibility to contracting CWD.
Long term if deer resistant to CWD can be identified then deer farms could play a huge role in getting those genes into the population of wild deer.
Current practices often work against this. For instance there was a deer farm that had a deer test positive for CWD. The entire herd was killed. The other deer IN A DEER FARM SETTING that had lived side by side with this infected deer all were killed and all were found to not come back with a positive test for CWD.
Think about it. All of those deer did NOT test positive after living with and infected deer for years. To me that sounds like the genotype of deer you would want to promote... not take out.
EHD outbreaks that kill over half of the deer population occur almost exclusively further north than the deep south. The researches suspect that resistance to EHD is an indicator of possible resistance to CWD.
Either way I am glad I don't hunt up north and have to deal with what they deal with. I have a buddy that lives in Saskatchewan and if it isn't record cold it is the wolves. If it isn't wolves it is EHD, if it isn't EHD it is CWD. Always something decimating their deer herd. No deer herd in the south has been decimated by CWD.
Fingers crossed. But it looks like our herd is somewhat immune from the horrible outcomes that happen in places like Ohio.
I don't clam to be an expert but I do have some training at the college level in wildlife management. My major was forestry.
Anyway nobody seems to have an iron clad idea of exactly what is going on with CWD but I am very hopeful. Especially in the south and strange as it may seem deer farms might actually be part of the answer... especially if you live further north.
I adhere to the theory (not my theory, I didn't start this theory) that the deer in the southeast are much less susceptible to CWD than northern deer. The bad outbreaks do not seem to be in the south.
For instance. Mississippi has CWD and with very little action the percentage of infections doesn't seem to be increasing. They liberalized hunting regulations and banned baiting. But I personally do not believe those regulations are what is responsible for the frequency of infection staying mostly flat
There is research being done to identify genes that provide RESISTENCE to CWD. Resistance... NOT immunity.
Resistance is huge. Deer do not live for long periods of time. So you you just delay the average age of contracting the disease then you can significantly reduce the impact on the age structure of your deer herd (trophy potential).
Researchers have identified a number of genes that they think reduce the susceptibility to contracting CWD.
Long term if deer resistant to CWD can be identified then deer farms could play a huge role in getting those genes into the population of wild deer.
Current practices often work against this. For instance there was a deer farm that had a deer test positive for CWD. The entire herd was killed. The other deer IN A DEER FARM SETTING that had lived side by side with this infected deer all were killed and all were found to not come back with a positive test for CWD.
Think about it. All of those deer did NOT test positive after living with and infected deer for years. To me that sounds like the genotype of deer you would want to promote... not take out.
EHD outbreaks that kill over half of the deer population occur almost exclusively further north than the deep south. The researches suspect that resistance to EHD is an indicator of possible resistance to CWD.
Either way I am glad I don't hunt up north and have to deal with what they deal with. I have a buddy that lives in Saskatchewan and if it isn't record cold it is the wolves. If it isn't wolves it is EHD, if it isn't EHD it is CWD. Always something decimating their deer herd. No deer herd in the south has been decimated by CWD.
Fingers crossed. But it looks like our herd is somewhat immune from the horrible outcomes that happen in places like Ohio.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 6:54 pm to omegaman66
quote:
For instance there was a deer farm that had a deer test positive for CWD. The entire herd was killed. The other deer IN A DEER FARM SETTING that had lived side by side with this infected deer all were killed and all were found to not come back with a positive test for CWD.
Got a link?
NW Ark is eaten up with it. That’s pretty South.
This post was edited on 4/3/26 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 4/3/26 at 7:05 pm to omegaman66
quote:Is there scientific evidence that any deer herd anywhere has been decimated by CWD? Any studies showing it? I’m asking because that is a question that doesn’t seem to get answered with any proof. The guy that runs rackjunkies has been asking this and he doesn’t seem to get any answers.
No deer herd in the south has been decimated by CWD.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 8:29 pm to turkish
quote:
NW Ark is eaten up with it. That’s pretty South
Agree. Deer density in some of those counties are like one deer per square mile.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 9:06 pm to AFtigerFan
quote:
Is there scientific evidence that any deer herd anywhere has been decimated by CWD? Any studies showing it? I’m asking because that is a question that doesn’t seem to get answered with any proof. The guy that runs rackjunkies has been asking this and he doesn’t seem to get any answers.
That depends on what you consider decimated. I consider a deer herd that has 25% of their deer testing positive as decimated. Why? Because it is hard to detect in the early period of infection. So 25% means the number is higher.
To be clear I am just plucking 25% out of the air. What the concern is, the higher the infection rate the earlier the average age of infection will be. And the earlier the average age of infection the shorter the deers life span will be. If the average age of a deers life is shortened then the number of mature bucks can be significantly affected. And that doesn't even factor in the situation of people not wanting to eat deer meat if there is a real chance of it having CWD.
So my definition of decimated is a deer herd that is infected to the degree that the age structure is affected and the use of deer meat is affected.
Posted on 4/3/26 at 9:13 pm to turkish
quote:
Got a link?
No. I can tell you that there is a video on youtube where I got the information from. I did a quick search hoping to find it for you but ten seconds in it didn't jump out at me. But I did notice a number of links showing up that have titles that talk about this.
I watched a lot of videos on this and read some so unfortunately just searching and finding the link in the list isn't going to point me to it now because I watched a bunch of the links and it didn't just jump out to me with one was the one.
Popular
Back to top

5






