- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Joe Kent on Piers Morgan
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:25 am
Piers: You said that you’re skeptical that Tyler Robinson, who confessed to killing Charlie Kirk, was the lone shooter. You also said that the FBI did not properly investigate his killing. “The FBI was pretty forceful in saying we couldn’t investigate further. I saw no action being taken.” And you alluded to foreign involvement.
Now this is a spot of a lot of kick back from a lot of Charlie Kirk fans and colleagues.
First, do you stand by what you said? And would you like to elaborate on it.
Joe: I do. Look, I want justice for Charlie Kirk as I think every American does. The National Counter Terrorism Center’s purview was investigating all foreign ties. I think based on what we’ve seen in the public, there were folks who had pre knowledge of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. From my vantage point at NCTC, I don’t believe that there was a complete investigation was done. And so, I think that’s important.
As far as the case against Tyler Robinson goes, I can’t speak to him. It sounds to me like they have enough evidence to convict him. That will play out in a court of law. But from my vantage point, what we were responsible for, I believe there was more work to be done.
Piers: and is your gut feeling that he did not act alone?
Joe: The potential of him having assistance, again with the people saying they had pre knowledge, with the people jumping up in the crowd and claiming that they were the one who took the shot, it does appear that there were additional people who had pre knowledge of it. I think that’s about all I can say on that. And again from my vantage point at NCTC during the investigation, I don’t believe that we were able to run down every single lead possible.
Piers: any relation to possible foreign involvement, have you got any clarity about where that may have come from?
Joe: all I can say is that there was more work for us to be done in terms of the investigation itself. So I have to just leave that there.
Bit starts around 29:50.
The great kvetching of Joe Kent begins.
Now this is a spot of a lot of kick back from a lot of Charlie Kirk fans and colleagues.
First, do you stand by what you said? And would you like to elaborate on it.
Joe: I do. Look, I want justice for Charlie Kirk as I think every American does. The National Counter Terrorism Center’s purview was investigating all foreign ties. I think based on what we’ve seen in the public, there were folks who had pre knowledge of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. From my vantage point at NCTC, I don’t believe that there was a complete investigation was done. And so, I think that’s important.
As far as the case against Tyler Robinson goes, I can’t speak to him. It sounds to me like they have enough evidence to convict him. That will play out in a court of law. But from my vantage point, what we were responsible for, I believe there was more work to be done.
Piers: and is your gut feeling that he did not act alone?
Joe: The potential of him having assistance, again with the people saying they had pre knowledge, with the people jumping up in the crowd and claiming that they were the one who took the shot, it does appear that there were additional people who had pre knowledge of it. I think that’s about all I can say on that. And again from my vantage point at NCTC during the investigation, I don’t believe that we were able to run down every single lead possible.
Piers: any relation to possible foreign involvement, have you got any clarity about where that may have come from?
Joe: all I can say is that there was more work for us to be done in terms of the investigation itself. So I have to just leave that there.
Bit starts around 29:50.
The great kvetching of Joe Kent begins.
11
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:26 am to the808bass
I'd much rather Israel and the US take over the world than Muzzies.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:27 am to theballguy
Incredible post. Absolutely unrelated. But incredible.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:28 am to the808bass
Look at the heading of the YT videa.
And thanks brother
And thanks brother
This post was edited on 3/28/26 at 10:28 am
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:28 am to the808bass
quote:
with the people jumping up in the crowd and claiming that they were the one who took the shot
There was only one, to my knowledge at least (a known moonbat).
Was there more?
If not, why is Kent exaggerating? That's not something people trying to tell the truth do.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:29 am to theballguy
Yeah. Unrelated to my post.
It’s the entire show of Piers. And all you read was the YouTube caption.
Are you millennial or Gen Z?
It’s the entire show of Piers. And all you read was the YouTube caption.
Are you millennial or Gen Z?
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:30 am to the808bass
He’s enjoying his 5 minutes of fame via media tour
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:30 am to Azkiger
quote:
why is Kent exaggerating?
More importantly, why is he completely backing away from his earlier implications that there was foreign involvement.
And why does he purposefully avoid those questions? He has retained counsel.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:31 am to the808bass
It seems to me like the guy just wants the crime to be fully investigated, rather than .Gov jumping to a sole conclusion and demonizing anyone disagrees with that sole conclusion at this stage.
You know, like "We know Richard Jewell did it, shut up and deal with that reality".
You know, like "We know Richard Jewell did it, shut up and deal with that reality".
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:31 am to the808bass
quote:
kvetching
Gesundheit.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 10:36 am to OccamsStubble
Things that seem apparent to me from that interview.
1) he now wants no part of the court case of Tyler Robinson
2) he is not going to even dance around implying TPUSA’s stance on Israel was part of the causal chain of Kirk’s killing
3) he knows about as much as the average Poliboard poster about the Kirk assassination
1) he now wants no part of the court case of Tyler Robinson
2) he is not going to even dance around implying TPUSA’s stance on Israel was part of the causal chain of Kirk’s killing
3) he knows about as much as the average Poliboard poster about the Kirk assassination
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:01 am to the808bass
Hey come on man. No need to insult.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:11 am to the808bass
Nothing he said in the interview was out of the blue or even a shot at Trump. This board hates him because he resigned and Trump has bashed him plenty of times since with some extreme low blows, which only makes himself look bad for putting him in that position.
Should have taken the high road like he did with the Musk fallout
Should have taken the high road like he did with the Musk fallout
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:14 am to the808bass
Did Piers ask Joe if he is the one who rutted up my yard this past Halloween night? I'm pretty sure it was him, but my cameras had fricked off and I didn't get a good shot of the driver.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:15 am to the808bass
So he admits it was Tyler robinson.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:27 am to the808bass
quote:
he knows about as much as the average Poliboard poster about the Kirk assassination
You can't be fricking dumb enough to think he doesnt have or has had, access to MUCH more intelligence than most
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:32 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
You can't be fricking dumb enough to think he doesnt have or has had, access to MUCH more intelligence than most
Sure. More intelligence. What foreign intelligence finds are related to the Charlie Kirk assassination?
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:42 am to the808bass
quote:
Sure. More intelligence. What foreign intelligence finds are related to the Charlie Kirk assassination?
I suspect Zero. Then again. I don't really know - no one would - unless every reasonable bit of information was investigated.
I'd have liked to have seen Butler fully investigated as well, but, it wasn't. Because it wasn't promotes a repeat of it in some way.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:43 am to the808bass
quote:
Joe: all I can say is that there was more work for us to be done in terms of the investigation itself. So I have to just leave that there.
When they say shite like this it just feels like a bigass psyop to sew confusion and discontent.
If there were actual tangible evidence there he would have no reason not to say it, this halfway bullshite is stupid.
Posted on 3/28/26 at 11:47 am to the808bass
quote:
What foreign intelligence finds are related to the Charlie Kirk assassination
So to be clear, you dont think he has people in certain positions that he could speak with at any time?
Again, Im just checking the level of ignorance here. There's no question its exists
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News