- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Just email evidence of Jack Smith, Garland DOJ colluding with sitting federal judges
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:13 pm
Get Trump is the theme and they don't care about legality. That's right, Judge Howell and Boasberg.
Chuck Grassley's drop for all documents released in this
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Chuck Grassley's drop for all documents released in this
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 12:41 pm
5
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:14 pm to TigerB8
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:16 pm to TigerB8
It seems this was per a scheduling conference and a way to make the docket efficient. Why not post the whole emails?
The judge prefers one omnibus motion to 11+ separate motions, is the summary
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The judge prefers one omnibus motion to 11+ separate motions, is the summary
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The judge prefers one omnibus motion to 11+ separate motions, is the summary
Note to the group- SFP is now citing random X posters with 300 followers and a Ukrainian flag in their bio because they agree with his point of view.
He now embraces that X is where news is broken and no will longer will scoff at any X post on this site going forward.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:24 pm to TigerB8
Those notes don’t look like anything nefarious. Perhaps OP could explain what is actually being alleged here?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why not post the whole emails?
Can't do the disinformation by curation if you don't do the curation.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:27 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Note to the group- SFP is now citing random X posters with 300 followers and a Ukrainian flag in their bio because they agree with his point of view.
Naw. It was just one of the replies.
I understood what the email was saying myself. No citation needed.
quote:
He now embraces that X is where news is broken and no will longer will scoff at any X post on this site going forward.
Holy shite you already have shown you're bad a logic, but you just tripled down
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:29 pm to TigerB8
Yeah y’all don’t know what you’re reading. Looks like practical procedural matters. Judges have preferences on how things are filed in their courts.
Groundbreaking.
Groundbreaking.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
STATISTFlowPro
I almost feel sorry for you.
PS - Tell us once more how the "valuation case" against Trump was legit even though they hysterically claimed that Mar A Lago was only worth $18 million.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:29 pm to KCT
quote:
PS - Tell us once more how the "valuation case" against Trump was legit
Have I ever?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:30 pm to Placekicker
quote:
He now embraces that X is where news is broken and no will longer will scoff at any X post on this site going forward.
It's a tad bit hypocritical, isn't it?
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:34 pm to KCT
quote:
It's a tad bit hypocritical, isn't it?
The strawman certainly is.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:46 pm to TigerB8
Sounds like an avalanche of recuals motions need to be filed for Howell and Boasberg.
Yes, they will deny them - likely without hearing, but that's what appeals and write are for. Clearly GOP has no stomach to do anything else.
Yes, they will deny them - likely without hearing, but that's what appeals and write are for. Clearly GOP has no stomach to do anything else.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:49 pm to udtiger
quote:
Sounds like an avalanche of recuals motions need to be filed for Howell and Boasberg.
Yes, they will deny them - likely without hearing, but that's what appeals and write are for. Clearly GOP has no stomach to do anything else.
I know you're a lawyer but you're not a litigator?
I always thought you were a litigator.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I know you're a lawyer but you're not a litigator?
I always thought you were a litigator.
I suspect I've spent more time in courtrooms and before appellate and Supreme Court panels than you could ever dream of.
Regardless, the fact this Administration doesn’t file recusal motions against every non-Trump judge in the DC courts is legal malpractice.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:13 pm to udtiger
quote:
I suspect I've spent more time in courtrooms and before appellate and Supreme Court panels than you could ever dream of.
Then you should understand how status/scheduling conferences go and judges telling the litigating attorneys how they prefer to proceed, especially with complex/overlapping motions.
This isn't complicated stuff for litigating attorneys.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
My statement is not exclusive to this particular tweet, but did presume it was as represented. As I said, these motions should be filed as a matter of course. These judges have made clearly biased public statements against Trump which warrants their recusal.
This post was edited on 3/24/26 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:18 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Boy, the cucks made a point to swarm into this thread. Like flies to elephant dung.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges states that a judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities, including personal and professional life. It mandates that judges act in a way that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, preventing family, social, or political relationships from influencing judicial decisions.
You suck.
You suck.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 1:20 pm to dgnx6
quote:
You suck.
You're exhibiting exactly the reaction the dishonest editing intended.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News