- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ChatGPT is confirmed to be fully partisan by simple exercise
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:03 pm
9
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:14 pm to Roaad
Posted on 3/21/26 at 1:38 pm to Roaad
Mine gave a thumbs up to both Kennedy and sellout
Posted on 3/21/26 at 2:44 pm to Roaad
Well, so much for my strategy of asking AI whom I should vote for.
FTR, I got different results, and also left the criteria undefined.
I swear, too many of you people fall for whatever clickbait outrage porn gets put in front of you.
FTR, I got different results, and also left the criteria undefined.
I swear, too many of you people fall for whatever clickbait outrage porn gets put in front of you.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 2:57 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
so much for my strategy of asking AI whom I should vote for.
I don't think that's the implication here. I think it's that you're going to get very inaccurate answers on your queries because of the inherent biases of ChatGPT against Rs and for Ds.
Try being less retarded.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 3:00 pm to Roaad
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
quote:Importantly ChatGPT (free version) is at least two years out-of-date in this response
Q: ChatGPT give a thumbs up or down for all 100 senators
A: That’s doable, but I need one key clarification first: what criteria are you judging them on?
A “thumbs up or down” could mean very different things depending on your standard, for example:
Overall job performance
Alignment with your political views
Economic policy
Foreign policy
Ethics/corruption
A specific issue (taxes, immigration, etc.)
If you want, I can:
Use a neutral metric (like bipartisan effectiveness or voting consistency), or
Apply a specific lens (e.g., conservative, libertarian, progressive, etc.)
Tell me the criteria, and I’ll go through all 100 senators with ?? / ?? accordingly.
---
Q: You decide
A: Alright—since you left it to me, I’ll use a mixed, neutral-ish standard based on:
demonstrated competence / seriousness
willingness to engage legislatively (not just media presence)
avoidance of major ethical issues
some openness to bipartisan work
This won’t perfectly match any ideology—it’s more about functioning senators vs. performative or problematic ones.
Generally Positive (effective / serious / constructive)
John Thune
Chuck Grassley
Lisa Murkowski
Susan Collins
Mitt Romney
Todd Young
Bill Cassidy
Shelley Moore Capito
John Cornyn
Jerry Moran
Mike Rounds
John Hickenlooper
Mark Warner
Chris Coons
Amy Klobuchar
Michael Bennet
Gary Peters
Jeanne Shaheen
Angus King
Jon Tester
Catherine Cortez Masto
Jacky Rosen
Generally Negative (more performative, extreme, or ethically problematic)
Ted Cruz
Josh Hawley
Tommy Tuberville
Marjorie Taylor Greene (included for comparison; not a senator)
Rand Paul
Rick Scott
Ron Johnson
J.D. Vance
Eric Schmitt
Cynthia Lummis
Alex Padilla
Ed Markey
Elizabeth Warren
Bernie Sanders
Cory Booker
Posted on 3/21/26 at 3:00 pm to Roaad
About a year ago Chat GPT told me Abraham Lincoln was a Democrat.
Long story but it basically told me, well everybody thinks he was a democrat so i just told you what you wanted to hear.
I use GPT everyday but be careful.
Long story but it basically told me, well everybody thinks he was a democrat so i just told you what you wanted to hear.
I use GPT everyday but be careful.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 3:00 pm to Roaad
Ask grok
Posted on 3/21/26 at 3:03 pm to Barstools
quote:
Try being less retarded.
Did I type this part too fast for you?
quote:
FTR, I got different results, and also left the criteria undefined.
My results were very, very different, and there was minimal difference in party.
But, hey, maybe you just like being manipulated.
Posted on 3/21/26 at 5:27 pm to Roaad
Any time you ask it about crimes that Dems committed that have not been through court yet, the first thiung Google's AI says is That is a conspiracy theory. It has zero interest in the facts of what happened. Maybe we should call it The Bondi. 
Posted on 3/21/26 at 5:50 pm to Roaad
I was going to post the screenshots but it would take eight of them. I have them though if anyone wants to verify.
I started by asking:
I started by asking:
quote:the first reply showed a sample list and said:
give a thumbs up or thumbs down for all 100 senators
quote:to which I replied
That’s a sample to show the format. Doing all 100 meaningfully isn’t just a formatting task, it requires a consistent standard (policy positions, ethics, effectiveness, etc.).
Give me your criteria and I’ll run all 100 cleanly with no filler.
quote:it then responded with a list that would have been several screenshots long. I then asked:
I didn't mean show me the format. I know what a thumbs up looks like. give a thumbs up or thumbs down for all 100 senators
quote:it replied:
what was your criteria?
quote:my final prompt
Simple, consistent filter. No scoring model, just a few load-bearing tests:
**1) Constitutional floor**
Respect for election outcomes, rule of law, and limits on executive power. If someone flirted with undermining that, it’s a thumbs down.
**2) Governance over theatrics**
Legislative work, coalition building, and actually moving policy vs. constant performative conflict. Show horses lose points.
**3) Policy alignment (my baseline)**
* Pro-democracy protections (voting access, peaceful transfer of power)
* Pro-worker tilt (wages, labor rights)
* Evidence-based policy on health, climate, and economics
* Some willingness to regulate markets where they fail
**4) Consistency / integrity**
Fewer abrupt flips driven by party pressure or personal gain. Clear through-line beats opportunism.
**5) Institutional respect**
Treating the Senate as a governing body, not just a media platform.
Anyone who cleared most of those got a ??. Failing on #1 was basically an automatic ??.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News