- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
David Bailey and Rueben Bain Game Logs
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:09 pm
Presented without commentary
Snaps
Bain
707 total
263 vs run
440 vs pass
87.5 run grade
Bailey
623 total snaps
225 vs run
380 vs pass
76.4 run grade
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:14 pm to GynoSandberg
We don't know which, if either, will make it to us, but I'd be fine with either if the team believes in them.
Number are very similar.
Number are very similar.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:15 pm to GynoSandberg
Which one helps stop the run?
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:17 pm to Chad504boy
Similar tackle numbers, but without stop numbers and such it's hard to know.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:17 pm to Chad504boy
My pure guess would give the edge to Bain.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:18 pm to goatmilker
It ain’t a debate goat.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:21 pm to bonethug0180
How many of the 707 was played w flu?
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:22 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Add snaps, Sandy
Bain
707 total
263 vs run
440 vs pass
87.5 run grade
Bailey
623 total snaps
225 vs run
380 vs pass
76.4 run grade
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:22 pm to GynoSandberg
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:24 pm to GynoSandberg
Bain destroys the run and pass
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:25 pm to Proximo
Bailey and Bain aren’t comparable edge players tbh. If you want pure speed and sacks then we know who your guy is preferred
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:25 pm to GynoSandberg
From Texas Tech's own site they say 623, not 510. Both numbers I pulled were from the team site.
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:27 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
If you want pure speed and sacks then we know who your guy is preferred
speed, explosiveness and measurables are important. I don't think we can risk an outlier player in the top 10
**he also refused to participate at the combine. Kellen said he likes guys that participate like Shough. fwiw
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:34 pm to bonethug0180
PFF isn’t counting Bailey’s postseason snaps for some reason
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:43 pm to GynoSandberg
anyone know anything about Lawrence? Might be an option at 42.
I found some pics of him but he's playing with two knee braces which is worrisome
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:49 pm to Proximo
quote:
speed, explosiveness and measurables are important. I don't think we can risk an outlier player in the top 10
This is WAAAAYYYYY more important than what Saints fans want to admit. Bain has a higher bust potential than Bailey does. I can definitely see Bain’s game not translate to a dominant edge player in the NFL. His build & his lack of fast twitch athleticism is what’s concerning.
At 8……you can NOT afford to have YET ANOTHER bust at edge. Not that we shouldn’t select an edge player at 8, but (as you said) you can’t select someone with that high of a bust potential. He may turn out to be a stud, but if he’s a bust it would be catastrophic.
The fact that he didn’t participate in anything at the combine (when there are all of these questions) doesn’t bode well.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:53 pm to infantry1026
quote:
you can NOT afford to have YET ANOTHER bust at edge
agreed, and just when we're starting to forget Foskey..
we simply can't have a John Sullivan type of top 10 bust when we're trying to build this thing out early in the process. Get someone we know is going to be productive at that spot
Popular
Back to top

10






