- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Facebook/Meta data center solar farm - Mobile Bay area
Posted on 2/10/26 at 8:56 am
Posted on 2/10/26 at 8:56 am
Heads up baws. Facebook/Meta is building a data center near Mobile and is flattening 4500 acres of forest adjacent to the Alabama delta (between Bay Minette and Stockton) to build a solar farm to power this. They slipped this in and got approval really fast and quiet.
LINK
If yall value your land, pay attention to this, it will happen near you. If you live in Alabama, write your elected officials!
LINK
If yall value your land, pay attention to this, it will happen near you. If you live in Alabama, write your elected officials!
Posted on 2/10/26 at 10:45 am to tadman
Awesome, job opportunities for the area. They bring a ton of jobs as well as increased support infrastructure near them.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:44 am to tadman
I wonder what they main power provider will be because solar isn't it. Kiss the ground water in that area good bye, just like those folks in NLA. In 10 years the south will be just like the Midwest and Cali with everything running dry and salt water incursion.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 12:01 pm to tadman
frickin awful. Solar farms are a plague.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 12:22 pm to tadman
And now the local news stations are losing their fricking minds over it
Posted on 2/10/26 at 12:34 pm to OleBallCoach
quote:
They bring a ton of jobs
They subcontract to various construction companies that employ fleets of illegals. A data center near me under construction was raided last month and lost 70% of their workforce.
Post construction you’re talking low wage security jobs and possibly a dozen or so on site full time tech positions that will be filled by H1B.
Baw thinks it’s 1985.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 12:41 pm to OleBallCoach
quote:
Awesome, job opportunities for the area. They bring a ton of jobs as well as increased support infrastructure near them.
This incorrect. It's not a building nor a highway. Minimal construction after the land is clear-cut. Couple security guards. Up at the data center you might see ten full time jobs. Arent they still making these solar panels in China?
Regardless of your views or politics here (I don't see how anybody that hunts or considers themselves an environmentalist can support this) it was clearly done in a hurry and very quietly because they knew the opposition would be tremendous on both sides.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 12:44 pm to tadman
Data centers rape and pillage natural resources. They should be nuclear powered and close loop cooled only.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 1:34 pm to lurking
Company, I work for subs employees to two current data centers near Austin. Element Cricital and Data Foundry total about 230 total employees. Look to have a contract about wrapped up with the current meta project in NELA. Looking at 250+ employees.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 5:01 pm to OleBallCoach
The solar farm part is the big sticking point I think. Not whether it will create 10 or 200 jobs.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:28 am to tadman
quote:
I don't see how anybody that hunts or considers themselves an environmentalist can support this
I take the point but if the person who is a hunter or an environmentalist doesn't own the land in question and is not actively acquiring the land it is none of their business what someone else does with their property. Unfortunately that is the foundation of free market capitalism. I get it, not in my backyard and what not, but my backyard is not going to have a data center on it, if my neighbor puts one on hers I don't have to like it but I don't really have a dog in the fight. If the authority having jurisdiction approves the plan again them's the breaks. That is not to suggest that people do not have a responsibility to oppose such plans and actively work within the system to stop them but at the end of the day doing so is in direct opposition to the principals of free market capitalism...which is perfectly acceptable to sane people, stop signs are generally acceptable forms of market regulation, but one can't be a champion of laissez faire capitalism and a champion of government regulation of what an individual can and can't do with their property. Not all regulation is bad despite the opinion of many....
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:41 am to lurking
quote:
They subcontract to various construction companies that employ fleets of illegals. A data center near me under construction was raided last month and lost 70% of their workforce.
Post construction you’re talking low wage security jobs and possibly a dozen or so on site full time tech positions that will be filled by H1B.
Baw thinks it’s 1985.
They also are currently driving a pretty damned hot economy and will do so for the foreseeable future. AI created an additional 1.1% boost in US GDP in the first six months of 2025. Just a year ago. Without that boost the economy was pretty anemic. The impact appears to be even greater in subsequent quarters but the data is not solidified at this point...it is, however, doubtful that AI didn't positively impact the economy in those quarters or that it will not continue to do so for the foreseeable future. WIthout data centers and their massive consumption of power and water and resource consumption that impact will lag and in a free market that is not a moral stand to take. Data centers certainly do not create many jobs in the commuting area, that is a certified fact, beyond the period of construction....but they do facilitate a massive amount of commerce spread out across the entire globe that does create a massive number of jobs and betters the lives of everyone on the planet. Nobody likes having one in their neighborhood and the continued protests and regulatory hurdles will drive innovation that makes them more palatable and that is also a function of a free market...folks can raise hell without penalty....but they are highly necessary for the continued growth and expansion of the US economy in their current manifestation.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:49 am to GREENHEAD22
quote:
I wonder what they main power provider will be because solar isn't it. Kiss the ground water in that area good bye, just like those folks in NLA. In 10 years the south will be just like the Midwest and Cali with everything running dry and salt water incursion.
There is a solution...like minded people, and based solely on anecdotal evidence on facebook and social media, indicates a massive number of people are opposed to data centers being built in their back yards. The number of people who seem to be opposed is not small in number....they should be able to exert a PILE of pressure on local and state officials if they are truly opposed. They also have the option to band together and purchase the property. Of course that means doing something other than spouting off on facebook and that ain't happening...and they certainly ain't going to put their money where their mouth is.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 6:09 am to AwgustaDawg
Unabated free market economics in a completely global economy means unabated rape and pillage of natural resources.
There are environmentally friendly ways to construct, power and cool things like this. They just aren't the absolute cheapest so they aren't used.
This is where both political sides get everything wrong. The rednecks hear environment, think EPA and PETA, and want no part till something is cutting down their hunting spot. The blue hairs hear carbon capture and solar and wind and get giddy as hell while the landscape is destroyed to support it. Both sides are very wrong.
There are environmentally friendly ways to construct, power and cool things like this. They just aren't the absolute cheapest so they aren't used.
This is where both political sides get everything wrong. The rednecks hear environment, think EPA and PETA, and want no part till something is cutting down their hunting spot. The blue hairs hear carbon capture and solar and wind and get giddy as hell while the landscape is destroyed to support it. Both sides are very wrong.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 6:43 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I would assume they are going to pull from the Mobile river, which is better than ground water. Is there a power plant in Mobile that has spare capacity?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 7:18 am to GREENHEAD22
I dont know the details of this project, im just bitching. I doubt they use river water though. River water requires exchangers, aquifer water doesnt.
If they are using river water ONLY, my general level of "frick those people" is cut back a fair bit. Raw water and heat exchangers is a good way to do this. I'd be amazed if thats actually what they are doing though.
Solar farms can get fricked regardless. If a solar panel goes anywhere other than on the outer shell of a usable building, its probably a stupid misapplication of the technology.
InB4 some jackass whoring out his wifes pawpaws land and getting rich off solar panels or windmills tells me im wrong.
If they are using river water ONLY, my general level of "frick those people" is cut back a fair bit. Raw water and heat exchangers is a good way to do this. I'd be amazed if thats actually what they are doing though.
Solar farms can get fricked regardless. If a solar panel goes anywhere other than on the outer shell of a usable building, its probably a stupid misapplication of the technology.
InB4 some jackass whoring out his wifes pawpaws land and getting rich off solar panels or windmills tells me im wrong.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 7:33 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
You are spot on.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:41 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I take the point but if the person who is a hunter or an environmentalist doesn't own the land in question and is not actively acquiring the land it is none of their business what someone else does with their property. Unfortunately that is the foundation of free market capitalism.
This isn't necessarily true, either. Say you own property A. It can be a house that you have your life savings invested into. Or it could be a condo development that you've invested quite a few peoples' savings into.
You don't own property B, adjacent. I show up and open a scrap yard or garbage dump and run it 24/7. How do you feel? Your wife is pissed because it keeps you up all night. You can't sell property A because who wants to buy next to a scrap yard? Now your investment is lost.
We do have some land use restrictions because otherwise, as a pro-capitalist person that we predominantly are here on this board, it would inhibit the financing of capitalist ventures if the lender feared a garbage dump could open next door.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:49 am to tadman
there's a gigantic aluminum products plant going in just north of Ban Minette as well. I assume will take gigawatts of power.
Popular
Back to top
5









