Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Pats offense averaged 9 punts/turnovers per game in the playoffs

Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:29 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:29 am
27 punts and 8 turnovers in 4 games

That is so bad. Also brings up something I have always thought, a punt should be viewed as a 0.5 turnover. You are quite literally turning the ball over to the other team
Posted by Splackavellie
Bayou
Member since Oct 2017
12384 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:32 am to
Historically bad offense.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
42344 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:36 am to
Them and the Bears this season were the luckiest teams I’ve seen in probably a decade.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
107735 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:39 am to
They were lucky to play opposite 2 of the worst post season QB perfomances ever... Stroud and stidham.
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
17762 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:43 am to
quote:

something I have always thought, a punt should be viewed as a 0.5 turnover. You are quite literally turning the ball over to the other team


This is pretty dumb
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

This is pretty dumb
Why?

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:55 am to
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
17762 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 11:58 am to
Stick to tennis
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 12:04 pm to
Tell me why punting it to your opponent and they get it on the 25 is ok but turning it over ion the 25 isnt?

It’s the same exact net effect. I say 0.5 of a turnover because of the times a turnover is worse because it happens on your end of the field
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
26841 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 12:10 pm to
Comparing the Pats playoff run, who went up against easily three of the best defenses in the last 5 years, in a row, and another very solid unit in San Diego, and the 2017 Browns in the reg season is a monumentally stupid argument.

Pats average offensive scoring effeicnecy in the reg season was 0.469 Points per snap, which was second in the NFL....



Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Comparing the Pats playoff run, who went up against easily three of the best defenses in the last 5 years, in a row, and another very solid unit in San Diego, and the 2017 Browns in the reg season is a monumentally stupid argument. Pats average offensive scoring effeicnecy in the reg season was 0.469 Points per snap, which was second in the NFL
No taking into account the Pats had a historic regular season in terms of quality of opponent?
Posted by TT9
Seychelles
Member since Sep 2008
91439 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 12:15 pm to
Amazing we made it to the Super bowl in the first place considering the lack of talent on the offensive side.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
35181 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 12:29 pm to
How you can tell that you have a DC as a HC.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71607 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

They were lucky to play opposite 2 of the worst post season QB perfomances ever... Stroud and stidham.


And Herbert behind a turnstile line.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7236 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

quote:
This is pretty dumb
Why?


Why would you need to count a punt as half a turnover. Turnovers is a tracked statistic, punts is also a tracked statistic. No need to combine the too.

In short, what is improved by this proposal?

Using the Patriots numbers, you would be saying they turned the ball over 21.5 times in the playoffs. That's convoluted.
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 2:30 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Why would you need to count a punt as half a turnover. Turnovers is a tracked statistic, punts is also a tracked statistic. No need to combine the too. In short, what is improved by this proposal? Using the Patriots numbers, you would be saying they turned the ball over 21.5 times in the playoffs. That's convoluted.
Because you never really hear people talk about punts as an “offensive stat”

You will hear “the offense did a good job protecting the defense and playing safe”

Zero turnovers but 8 punts

“The offense really hurt the defense with its turnovers”

3 turnovers and 1 punt

I would argue that scenario A is worse most of the time

A drive down to the opponent 10 and then a fumble is far better than a 3 and out punt. But people would never view it that way for some reason

You hear “turnovers kill you” but nobody gives a shite about punts
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7236 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 3:13 pm to
I disagree with just about the whole premise.

Turnovers are generally seen as worse than a punt because they usually kill momentum and/or result in better field position for the opposing team. Punting is a strategic choice.

But yeah, people generally think that punting a whole lot is bad.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
109981 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 3:41 pm to
Average lost EPA of a turnover is exactly double for a punt

Hence why I said a punt should be used as half a turnover…. They shouldn’t be viewed separately when judging offensive efficiency
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
27307 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 3:52 pm to
But but ..Drake Main s the new Tom Brady!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram