- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A viable plan for Canada To Join the United States
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:04 pm
https://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2026/02/06/a_plan_for_canada_to_join_the_united_states_1163269.html
Significant data as to why this may happen.
This would cause the next domino.
An Independent Quebec would be similar to France or Norway, Western Liberal and pro NATO, especially if we befriend them.
Ontario would be cut off from British Colombia and the Pacific, as well as the Maritimes and the Atlantic.
With no money Toronto and Ottawa collapse.
Its an idea that these broken parts could become strong small allies like the Netherlands.
All without a war, or swamping us in Liberals.
quote:
However, integrating Canada as one state would be unwise. Trump’s talk of a “51st state” may entertain some, but it misses the point. Instead, Canada should be integrated into America one province at a time beginning with the Province of Alberta.
Significant data as to why this may happen.
quote:
Integrating Alberta would not merely add a resource-rich jurisdiction to the American map; it would unplug the energy source of the Canadian federation, knocking down the first domino that would bring the rest of Canada to America. Saskatchewan, with a similar economy and political profile, would likely follow soon after.
This would cause the next domino.
quote:
However, it cannot be overstated that any serious American plan to annex Canada must recognize that Quebec is not part of the plot. Its identity as a French-speaking nation with its own singular laws, culture, and norms deserves respect and separation.
An Independent Quebec would be similar to France or Norway, Western Liberal and pro NATO, especially if we befriend them.
quote:
With that said, once Alberta joins the United States and Quebec exits the confederation, the backbone of Canada collapses. Smaller provinces would face a stark choice: cling to a diminished federal core or integrate into the American system that already anchors their trade and security.
Ontario would be cut off from British Colombia and the Pacific, as well as the Maritimes and the Atlantic.
With no money Toronto and Ottawa collapse.
Its an idea that these broken parts could become strong small allies like the Netherlands.
All without a war, or swamping us in Liberals.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 9:14 pm
25
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:07 pm to Narax
Yea frick all that.
Keep those syrupeans up there
Keep those syrupeans up there
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:07 pm to Narax
Exile the socialists who support socialized medicine to the Artic.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:08 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Yea frick all that.
Keep those syrupeans up there
Albertans would fit in nicely.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:08 pm to Narax
I'd rather import millions of Mexicans than Canadians.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:08 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
syrupeans
Love it.
Though I think those are not Alberta people.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:11 pm to Narax
naw, don't want another liberal group
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:13 pm to Narax
Give it to me I want it.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:13 pm to Narax
Only if we can sell off Minnesota.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:17 pm to Narax
If we want Greenland and Alberta/Saskatchewan, I say clip parts of SW BC off and ask the rest if they want to join, keeping P. Rupert and maybe put some serious work into making a port out of Squamish. Maybe at some time Vancouver libs begin to move to Cali and you have a great western port.
But why stop at lowly populated Greenland? Why not look at inviting the same kinds of lands like NW, Yukon and Nunavut?
Are they as far north as Thule Base? Some of it is. So it is strategic. But also, if we think there is dig-able minerals in Greenland, then we can look into the large northern islands as well. They are just as sparsely populated.
The thing about minerals is that it would have to be seasonal. You cannot affordably gather resources under ice, in my opinion. But water rights are also an imprtant thing to know about Nunavut and Greenland. That's important.
If the Ice Cap is shrinking, we need Donroe to start his Doctrine.
But why stop at lowly populated Greenland? Why not look at inviting the same kinds of lands like NW, Yukon and Nunavut?
Are they as far north as Thule Base? Some of it is. So it is strategic. But also, if we think there is dig-able minerals in Greenland, then we can look into the large northern islands as well. They are just as sparsely populated.
The thing about minerals is that it would have to be seasonal. You cannot affordably gather resources under ice, in my opinion. But water rights are also an imprtant thing to know about Nunavut and Greenland. That's important.
If the Ice Cap is shrinking, we need Donroe to start his Doctrine.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:21 pm to Narax
This is very stupid. First, support for leaving Canada is still a minority in Alberta. Secondly, as I understand it, there are significant holdings that are either directly administered by the Crown or by First Nations. Thirdly, unilateral secession is not recognized anywhere in the world. Lastly, Trump's rhetoric is what is driving Canada to look elsewhere. Had he said nothing, our relationship, which is the cornerstone of the Atlanticist foreign policy, would have been fine. In addition, Canada's relationship with the UK has always been closer and it is far more likely that Canada will turn to the Commonwealth rather than the US if the relationship continues to go south.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:21 pm to Narax
USEh?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:24 pm to ezride25
Sorry but canada is already too far gone. IMO its too big of risk to take the major cities. Get the coast. Newfoundland and new Brunswick. And get a couple along the border Alberta Saskatchewan. Leave Canada with their little liberal cesspool north of Detroit. Vancouver may be an easier turn. Mixed on that
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:33 pm to Narax
why would we annex a country that has millions of Indians and chinese stinking it up and owning all the property? Canada is completely overrun.
Anecdotally, when I work overseas and see an indian person gliding through customs they always have a Canadian passport. Sometimes they barely even speak English. Hordes of them at Hung Hom station in Hong Kong, all with Canada passports.
Anecdotally, when I work overseas and see an indian person gliding through customs they always have a Canadian passport. Sometimes they barely even speak English. Hordes of them at Hung Hom station in Hong Kong, all with Canada passports.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 9:48 pm to Trevaylin
While I agree with you Trev, I wonder how liberal Canada really is… or, if the Euros/Globalists are controlling elections?
I’d like to assume the Canadians crave freedom as much as we do!
I’d like to assume the Canadians crave freedom as much as we do!
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:04 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
This is very stupid.
Aligning with China is stupid.
quote:
First, support for leaving Canada is still a minority in Alberta.
Yes, about 30% so far.
quote:
Secondly, as I understand it, there are significant holdings that are either directly administered by the Crown or by First Nations.
Crown lands devolve to local government, its happened in every decolonialism.
First nations would be a negotiation.
quote:
Thirdly, unilateral secession is not recognized anywhere in the world.
So Canada would start shooting?
quote:
Had he said nothing, our relationship, which is the cornerstone of the Atlanticist foreign policy, would have been fine.
Thats stupid they have been cheating on trade for decades. They are selling their own people out.
Quebec and Alberta would be better without them.
quote:
In addition, Canada's relationship with the UK has always been closer and it is far more likely that Canada will turn to the Commonwealth rather than the US if the relationship continues to go south.
Alberta won't. Quebec won't.
This post was edited on 2/7/26 at 12:05 am
Posted on 2/7/26 at 6:07 am to Narax
quote:
Aligning with China is stupid.
Again, retarded.
quote:
Yes, about 30% so far
You should do some reading on the '95 referendum and understand why even 50% would not be enough.
quote:
Thats stupid they have been cheating on trade for decades
bullshite. Just because Trump says so doesn't make it reality.
quote:
They are selling their own people out.
Nah
quote:
So Canada would start shooting?
Would you join up to live out this retarded fantasy?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 10:42 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, retarded.
If you think Carney isn't you are a fool.
quote:
You should do some reading on the '95 referendum and understand why even 50% would not be enough.
That can flip very fast.
quote:
bullshite. Just because Trump says so doesn't make it reality.
Globe and mail published dozens of charts on this in December. Do you think Canada is an open market to US goods? Its not. Do some research.
quote:
Nah
Their economy is in deep trouble and Carney keeps trying to poke Trump into crippling tariffs.
quote:
Would you join up to live out this retarded fantasy?
So Canada wont send their military in if Alberta succeeded?
Its quite the question. Even if you dont want to admit it.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 11:22 am to Narax
quote:
If you think Carney isn't you are a fool
In geopolitical terms, what should they do?
quote:
That can flip very fast.
When has just 50% been enough for an independence referendum? Give me a historical example. And given that Trump's barbs led to a massive defeat from the jaws of victory for the Conservatives, I am skeptical that you know what can change or how it will change.
quote:
Do you think Canada is an open market to US goods?
If only there was some agreement which could address this, an agreement that a certain leader himself renegotiated during their first term...
quote:
Their economy is in deep trouble and Carney keeps trying to poke Trump into crippling tariffs
Vanguard suggests that 2026 will see 1.6% GDP growth, which is healthy for an economy the size of Canada. Maybe you just want to believe it more than the facts bear such a situation out.
quote:
So Canada wont send their military in if Alberta succeeded?
They absolutely would, if push comes to shove. In addition, First Nations are overwhelmingly against Alberta leaving. Are you going to go up and literally fight for oil? Answer my question.
The scenario you are describing is going to be hellish, and to be frank, you clearly don't understand the blowback. What you want is to create a geopolitical nightmare for no real gain. You morons sacrifice soft power because you have no ability to wield it and suddenly you have the Canadians of all people questioning whether they should buy more US jets. It is an absolutely idiotic situation and the blowback from such an adventure is clearly beyond your ability to understand.
You dumb fascists have a talent only for ensuring the exact conclusion you don't want. There is no kumbaya scenario where suddenly everyone is rich off Albertan oil. The scenario where you've invented a geopolitical flashpoint for no real gain is far more likely to happen, as it is happening right now. It is just retarded.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News