- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Movies today don’t even look and feel like “movies” at all
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:17 am
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:17 am
Ever since film production companies abandoned 35 mm and went straight to digital in the mid to late 2010s, Hollywood movies don’t even have that “cinematic” film aesthetic anymore. They look like artificial, ultra-refined, and digitalized with poor lighting that gives almost no shadowing to actors at all. As a result, movies look like insurance commercials now.
35 mm was the gold-standard for filmmaking from the 1960s all the way up until around 2015-2016. Due to the fact that the tiniest errors in exposure and development are very difficult to correct with 35 mm, it basically forced filmmakers and directors to already have pre-visualized shots in place before shooting. Combine that with perfected hard lighting, and you get the “cinematic” film feel that dominated Hollywood for close to 50 years.
Even those shitty low-budget comedy films from the late 90s/early 2000s had better lighting than most of the high-budget Marvel films that come out now. That should tell you something.
Nowadays, movies use solely digital and soft lighting which is the reason why they all look so incredibly bland and generic with no feel at all. We need to go back to 35 mm. Nothing will ever top it. Who gives a frick about if it’s “too outdated”? It was used for 50 fricking years by most Hollywood film companies.
35 mm was the gold-standard for filmmaking from the 1960s all the way up until around 2015-2016. Due to the fact that the tiniest errors in exposure and development are very difficult to correct with 35 mm, it basically forced filmmakers and directors to already have pre-visualized shots in place before shooting. Combine that with perfected hard lighting, and you get the “cinematic” film feel that dominated Hollywood for close to 50 years.
Even those shitty low-budget comedy films from the late 90s/early 2000s had better lighting than most of the high-budget Marvel films that come out now. That should tell you something.
Nowadays, movies use solely digital and soft lighting which is the reason why they all look so incredibly bland and generic with no feel at all. We need to go back to 35 mm. Nothing will ever top it. Who gives a frick about if it’s “too outdated”? It was used for 50 fricking years by most Hollywood film companies.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:45 am to JasonDBlaha
Sinners and One Battle were both shot on 35mm. Hell One Battle was shot on Vista Vision.
It's one of the primary reason both feel like actual movies again and not all the schlok. And neither one is even very good, but they are going to. Dominate the Oscars.
One Battle technically is briliant though. Dolly shots and boom shots and pans and long lenses, etc. All staples of old Hollywood. Hardly anyone does that anymore due to expense, laziness, lack of culture, and more.
It's a terrible thing that happened to films. Losing great original scores with real orchestra's and great composers has been a huge loss too.
It's very sad, actially, if you're a film fan.
It's one of the primary reason both feel like actual movies again and not all the schlok. And neither one is even very good, but they are going to. Dominate the Oscars.
One Battle technically is briliant though. Dolly shots and boom shots and pans and long lenses, etc. All staples of old Hollywood. Hardly anyone does that anymore due to expense, laziness, lack of culture, and more.
It's a terrible thing that happened to films. Losing great original scores with real orchestra's and great composers has been a huge loss too.
It's very sad, actially, if you're a film fan.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 11:56 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
One Battle technically is briliant though
Even though that was shot on 35 mm, it still doesn’t have that “cinematic” feel like the oldies. It still looks very artificial and cheap for a film that has an $130 million budget.
I guess there’s a lot more to lighting and camera placement that affect how a movie looks.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:04 pm to JasonDBlaha
As someone that has 0 knowledge about how films are made, is this why it seems impossible to understand people? I feel like I need captions constantly.
Is that because of how films are made or because how TVs are made now?
Is that because of how films are made or because how TVs are made now?
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:07 pm to JasonDBlaha
Movies cost more than ever to make while simultaneously looking much cheaper
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:30 pm to StansberryRules
Lighting was infinitely better in films from the 2000s
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:52 pm to JasonDBlaha
The overuse of cgi and modern color grading also adds to the fake look of everything.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:52 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
is this why it seems impossible to understand people?
That's due to advances in microphone technology. You used to have a guy with a boom mic, and actors had to talk loud enough and clear enough for the mic to hear it well. Now, they all wear nearly-invisible mics and the actors mumble and whisper. Add to that the sound mixing doesn't adjust for this most of the time, because frick you, that's why.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 12:56 pm to BottomlandBrew
quote:
Now, they all wear nearly-invisible mics and the actors mumble and whisper. Add to that the sound mixing doesn't adjust for this most of the time, because frick you, that's why.
Nolan just went from 6 to midnight
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:19 pm to Brosef Stalin
Modern color grading is absolute fricking dogshit. Do directors and filmmakers these days not look at films like The Matrix and how color grading made that film so successful?
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:25 pm to JasonDBlaha
I wish i could see a side by side to understand
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:34 pm to LSU1SLU
Villeneuve is particularly bad about this. Look at his Dune movies and how everyone has a brown/tan look to it. His Blade Runner movie is like this too.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:09 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Modern color grading is absolute fricking dogshit. Do directors and filmmakers these days not look at films like The Matrix and how color grading made that film so successful?
I also find there’s a growing trend of dark arse scenes where I can see anything else I get the angle just right.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:30 pm to JasonDBlaha
There was a thread a few months ago that linked to a video describing how new films and lack of depth of field, among other things just result in lifeless movies now. I’m probably not summarizing it adequately enough.
ETA: Found the video
ETA: Found the video
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:35 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
modern color grading
This is a big problem right here. The colorists legitimately suck these days. Everyone wants things to be so dark and grim. The world is a very colorful place. Stop muting it.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:38 pm to meeple
quote:
There was a thread a few months ago that linked to a video describing how new films and lack of depth of field, among other things just result in lifeless movies now. I’m probably not summarizing it adequately enough.
Good video.
I appreciate them using LOTR as an example. IMO this is also why you’ll see pushback on heavier AI involved editing. This is also part of that “soul” we were discussing in that thread.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:40 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Movies today don’t even look and feel like “movies” at all
The Last Jedi
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:42 pm to JasonDBlaha
“No one wants to do lighting anymore” -tarantino
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:43 pm to JasonDBlaha
Days of Thunder was on TV the other day. Tuned into it just for background noise. Just your basic 90's popcorn flick. Every time I looked up on the screen I was amazed how beautiful and how much ambiance comes through on screen from the cinematography. I don't know enough about movie making to know why it was different compared to how they make movies today. It was one of those things that struck me was just how much better this movie looks than anything I've seen come out recently.


Posted on 2/6/26 at 3:20 pm to DeoreDX
A Few Good Men was also another early 90s film that stuck out to me in terms of how good the lighting was. The lighting and color grading for the courtroom scene was so damn good that it looked like a painting.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 3:23 pm
Popular
Back to top

14








