Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why trade Missi unless it’s to dump Poole or Murray?

Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:36 pm
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7818 posts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:36 pm
They have to be trying to dangle him instead of a first to dump these two terrible contracts.
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
13050 posts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:39 pm to
Hard to say without knowing what they're trying to accomplish with Missi and Jose in these trade talks. They're the only two guys they're willing to trade that has any value right now.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470083 posts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 4:34 pm to
The possibility of trading Missi to dump Poole shows acquiring Poole was another all-time frickup by Dumars.
This post was edited on 1/30/26 at 4:35 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
75004 posts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 4:35 pm to
Ya don't say
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29993 posts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 6:49 pm to
Why would you trade Missi or any picks to dump Poole?
It would be beyond stupid to waste an asset to dump him.
We aren’t competing for anything. Don’t waste assets on a salary that expires next year.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8248 posts
Posted on 1/30/26 at 7:44 pm to
If it gets us free of those two contracts I’d trade Missi and I really like Missi but thats a lot of cap space opened up. Unfortunately no decent player wants to come to this team and we don’t have a draft pick either. Trade is the only way to get better.
Posted by slutiger5
Parroquias de Florida
Member since May 2007
11973 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 11:16 am to
Have we seen enough of Murray to get off that contract? Legit question.
Posted by ghost2most
Member since Mar 2012
7818 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Have we seen enough of Murray to get off that contract? Legit question.



I saw enough of Murray before he got hurt to want off the contract.
Posted by Split2874
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2012
3324 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:31 pm to
At least Poole's contract is up next season.

Wow..we have Murray until 27-28.

If we could unload either of them that would be amazing, unless we give up too much to move them.

Missi is improving every game and is still very young. I would keep him.

Posted by BGpels
Switzerland
Member since Mar 2024
158 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 2:23 pm to
And what exactly you will do with Poole's money next year? Attract free agent?
It will be unbelievably stupid to attach Missi to him. He is only 21, he is cheap and will be RFA only in 2028, not to mention that in the last month he improved significantly. So in a year, with proper coaching, he might be the big we need next to DQ.
Otherwise we will have to hope to select a better center in 2027, who will need 2-3 years to develop and by the time he does that, DQ and Fears might have seen enough from the Pels.
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 11:43 am
Posted by LSU4ever2002
Member since Sep 2009
708 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 9:40 am to
Stop paying to dump contracts. Just let them expire or wait until you are in final year. They are no longer negative value when in final year.

We aren’t competing for a title after one or two moves.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
31414 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

We aren’t competing for a title after one or two moves.


Dumars thought we were one project PF away from competing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram