- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Shouldn't the targeting penalty been addressed after the Devin White fiasco
Posted on 1/27/26 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 1:55 pm
“We’re going to be having a discussion on targeting,” Steve Shaw, the national coordinator of officials and the NCAA’s secretary-rules editor, told Yahoo Sports last week from Miami, site of the national title game. “That needs to be an annual discussion. It will be a focus discussion.”
When exploring the penalty structure this offseason, officials must determine if the disqualification — and the carryover disqualification — is still warranted
When exploring the penalty structure this offseason, officials must determine if the disqualification — and the carryover disqualification — is still warranted
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:03 pm to nicholastiger
To this day the dumbest fckin rule in sports.
Still zero clue what targeting actually is.
Still zero clue what targeting actually is.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:03 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
after the Devin White fiasco
what year is it
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:05 pm to nicholastiger
And call attention to the SEC Bama bias?
Good luck. Watch the video of Devin’s shove (called) vs Dallas’ crown to the chin on Jayden Daniels (ignored) for all you need.
Good luck. Watch the video of Devin’s shove (called) vs Dallas’ crown to the chin on Jayden Daniels (ignored) for all you need.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:07 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
Still zero clue what targeting actually is.
Whatever the refs want it to be in that instant.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:11 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
Still zero clue what targeting actually is.
Its impossible to apply the written rule to the action on the field consistently. If you watch a video with 4 different officials and ask them to describe what they see, you might get 4 diffent answers. in the end the white hat is going to "err on the side of cautions" which means frick the defense.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:12 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
To this day the dumbest fckin rule in sports.
Could not agree more. There was already a rule in place for spearing. The current rule is just ridiculous. Defenders have a hard time controlling where their head is going to go when they're already leaning forward and running at full speed trying to put a hit on a runner trying to avoid contact.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:20 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
To this day the dumbest fckin rule in sports.
So many times the announcers and TV ref are definitive on one side of the call and then the game officials get on the mic and rule the opposite.
It’s crazy they kick guys out of the game and possibly impact the next game on calls that are so ambiguous.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:26 pm to nicholastiger
That was one of worst calls in the entire history of college football. It wasn't targeting; possibly roughing the passer, and I'm not even sure that should have been called. Whatever that one play ALONE resulted in 45 penalty yards against the Tigers-- the "targeting" followed by two UCs stemming from the outrage against the initial penalty charge
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:28 pm to lsu711
quote:
So many times the announcers and TV ref are definitive on one side of the call and then the game officials get on the mic and rule the opposite.
It’s crazy they kick guys out of the game and possibly impact the next game on calls that are so ambiguous.
The amount of times the same play happens twice in a game and is called differently both times is simply outrageous
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:32 pm to Stevo
Not to mention they still get called if the runner lowers his head right before contact. It's just as bad as the NFL not knowing what the hell a completed catch is.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:32 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
the Devin White fiasco
GOAT sports message board crowdfunding operation

Posted on 1/27/26 at 2:37 pm to Tiger Prawn
The Alabama no call on the Daniels hit was criminal.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:53 pm to nicholastiger
There aren't enough four letter words to describe how ridiculously inconsistent this rule gets enforced!!! Furthermore, a moving target that could be twisting, falling, turning, is at times impossible to know where the head/neck area is going to be. Figure it out or get rid of it!
Posted on 1/27/26 at 10:57 pm to nicholastiger
I don’t care about the rule or its interpretation. But for fricks sake, ejecting the player is the dumbest thing they could possibly do and it really needs to change.
Make it a 25 yard penalty or eject on the 2nd offense, even if the first was in a prior game. Something different than the current crap. It negatively affects too many games.
Make it a 25 yard penalty or eject on the 2nd offense, even if the first was in a prior game. Something different than the current crap. It negatively affects too many games.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 11:01 pm to nicholastiger
What is this, October 2018??
Posted on 1/27/26 at 11:11 pm to Root_User
quote:
But for fricks sake, ejecting the player is the dumbest thing they could possibly do and it really needs to change.
This times a thousand. There is no other sport that ejects a player for an on field, game action play without there being a blatant level of intent. A pitcher can unleash a 100 mph fastball into a hitters face, and unless there has been a warning, or a previous incident, he isn't tossed. An NFL player can take two steps after the ball is released and plant a QB with helmet to helmet contact and stay in the game.
I am not a big fan of unionizing players, but there is no way in hell the ejection policy would exist if they had one.
Popular
Back to top
8











