- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In Bid to Rig Future Elections, Raskin Reintroduces Ranked Choice Voting Act
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:32 pm
LINK
quote:
Radical left-wing Jamie Raskin is once again pushing a sweeping overhaul of America’s voting system, this time by reintroducing a federal mandate for so-called “ranked-choice voting” (RCV) just as the country barrels toward another high-stakes midterm election cycle.
Raskin posted a video on X on Monday, pitching ranked-choice voting as a cure-all for American politics.
The video was released after he reintroduced H.R. 6589, a bill that would mandate ranked-choice voting in elections for the U.S. House and Senate nationwide.
“I believe our Ranked Choice Voting Act will not only guarantee majority winners across America but dramatically reduce negative politics and promote positivity in our elections,” Raskin wrote on X.
In his video, Raskin argued that RCV changes campaign incentives by encouraging candidates to seek second- and third-choice support instead of attacking opponents.
Under the system, voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes, the lowest vote-getter is eliminated and ballots are “redistributed” to remaining candidates until someone crosses the 50 percent threshold.
Raskin even praised races where candidates who finished second in the first round ultimately “catapulted ahead” after vote redistribution.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:33 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
this country is going to break apart isnt it?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
That's a big fat NO.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:34 pm to geauxtigers87
Good. Let’s get this show on the road. Louisiana should be the first to secede and teach America a lesson.
Never frick with conservatives.
Never frick with conservatives.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:34 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Jamie Raskin can eat shite.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Rank....as in stinky.
This^^^ is the Democratic Socialist party.
This^^^ is the Democratic Socialist party.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:37 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
It would decompartmentalize the current two party system, and I'm all for it. I can't think of a way this would somehow benefit Dems over Republicans or the other way around.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:41 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I wouldn't have it any other way....


Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:41 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
a bill that would mandate ranked-choice voting in elections for the U.S. House and Senate nationwide.
Is that something the Federal government can mandate?
That said, some of y'all are acting like ranked choice voting is some leftwing conspiracy. Five southern states use ranked choice for military overseas.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:47 pm to BigJim
quote:
Five southern states use ranked choice for military overseas.
Enlighten me please. I'm not aware of military voting.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Rank choice is a horrible method of voting.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:24 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
I would rather an absolutely blank ballot and you have to fill in names of the people you want to vote for.
No names
No party affiliation.
Just blanks next to each office.
No names
No party affiliation.
Just blanks next to each office.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:28 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Ranked choice voting is terrible. See Alaska
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:03 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
“Vote redistribution”
No thanks.
No thanks.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:08 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Surely this is satire and no one would ever actually back this, right..? right??
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:10 pm to geauxtigers87
quote:
this country is going to break apart isnt it?
If it does, first item of business is to conquer the other half.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:10 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Imagine being such a raging a-hole that your opponents root for your cancer...
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:10 pm to BabyDraco1499
quote:
Surely this is satire and no one would ever actually back this, right..? right??
Why? Tell me why, as a policy position, this is bad?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:14 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
If they take over the house and the senate and nuke the filibuster, they will do all sorts of nasty things.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:37 pm to boosiebadazz
Because this isn't the Heisman voting you idiot.
Explain ONE good reason for it
Explain ONE good reason for it
Popular
Back to top


14











