- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Brennan Attys Confirm He's Target of S FL Grand Jury Investigation
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Another cOnSpIrAcY tHeOrY found to be spot fricking on.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:33 pm to VoxDawg
In before SFP tells us that this is a nothingburger…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:33 pm to Placekicker
And half a dozen boo-birds cry that nothing will happen to anyone...
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:35 pm to VoxDawg
All these things we said were coming. They just continue happening when all these frickin losers said it was not possible.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:38 pm to VoxDawg
I was told he could be up next. I posted that info a couple of weeks ago. Got trapped on, of course.
Brennan is now crying about getting that female "Trump judge" in Florida. Aileen Cannon. So, he must think the hammer is about to drop.
Obtw, she isnt pro-Trump. She's pro-JUSTICE.
Brennan is now crying about getting that female "Trump judge" in Florida. Aileen Cannon. So, he must think the hammer is about to drop.
Obtw, she isnt pro-Trump. She's pro-JUSTICE.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:41 pm to VoxDawg
The prosecution of John Brennan should a bipartisan celebration. Dude is deep state garbage
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:42 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Another cOnSpIrAcY tHeOrY found to be spot fricking on.
What? When was it called a conspiracy theory?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:43 pm to Placekicker
quote:
In before SFP tells us that this is a nothingburger…
It's not as much that it's a nothingburger as much as it has major jurisdictional issues, and I imagine that will be litigated once an indictment is attempted.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:43 pm to KCT
quote:
Obtw, she isnt pro-Trump. She's pro-JUSTICE.
Except when ruling that the DOJ/FBI had probable cause to search MAL
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
I disagree with her on that, Baghdad Boob, but you just proved my point. She calls it like she sees it. That's why your boy Johnny Brennan doesn't want any part of her. The lifelong crook knows he's guilty as sin.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Except when ruling that the DOJ/FBI had probable cause to search MAL
Thank you for proving that she is pro justice and not pro Trump…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:05 pm to VoxDawg
Remember when Jack Smith did the exact same thing to Trump by using a grand jury in DC to vitiate Trump’s attorney-client privilege for a case Smith ultimately prosecuted in South Florida?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:13 pm to VoxDawg
Imagine a career Bureaucratic State Skunk accusing the current DOJ of judge shopping, particularly after the BS Trump and those around him had to endure with all the Democratic Socialist lawfare over the past 5 years. 
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What? When was it called a conspiracy theory?
What is the point in interacting with you when you were found to be the fricking meme when it comes to election interference?
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though
You are a clown and everyone should downvote your posts because of intellectual dishonesty.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:16 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:
when you were found to be the fricking meme when it comes to election interference?
Wut
quote:
You are a clown and everyone should downvote your posts because of intellectual dishonesty.
Oh. You're one of them.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Trying to seperate me from the intellectuals? One of THEM could mean anything. YOU said what is quoted and you have no evidence I am a part of THEM because you don't know what THEY are beyond disagreement with my post.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:28 pm to 10thyrsr
I already said you were one of them. You don't need to keep giving evidence to prove it.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yeah, but you didn't define "them". Who is them? If you can't define it, you may be schizophrenic.
I'm really concerned. You think "them" is someone out to get you?
I'm really concerned. You think "them" is someone out to get you?
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:35 pm to 10thyrsr
I would like to see Brennan fry as much as anyone.
Unfortunately, there is simply no case sgainst him that would make it to trial in SDFL. The 5-year statute of limitations has run and none of the alleged criminal acts occurred in SDFL.
From the letter, footnote 37 (this is very standard...no objective lawyer would disagree with this):
"When asked how they expect to work around the 5-year statute of limitations and establish venue in the SDFL for the prosecution of conduct involving an intelligence report that was issued almost nine years ago and produced by personnel in the Washington, D.C. area, they were equally unforthcoming.
The only reference to a criminal statute and to venue in our conversation with the prosecutors was to the allegation in a recent criminal referral by the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee that alleges (demonstrably falsely) that our client violated 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 in 2023 by lying in his testimony before that Committee about the ICA (specifically about whether a batch of materials known as the "Steele Dossier" was used in the analysis in the ICA).
When asked how they could possibly find venue in the Southern District of Florida for an investigation of alleged false statements that were made in a congressional committee room in Washington, D.C., the prosecutors refused to answer."
[I haven't read the whole thread. I imagine that SFP hasn't pointed out the jurisdictional and timeliness defects.]
Unfortunately, there is simply no case sgainst him that would make it to trial in SDFL. The 5-year statute of limitations has run and none of the alleged criminal acts occurred in SDFL.
From the letter, footnote 37 (this is very standard...no objective lawyer would disagree with this):
"When asked how they expect to work around the 5-year statute of limitations and establish venue in the SDFL for the prosecution of conduct involving an intelligence report that was issued almost nine years ago and produced by personnel in the Washington, D.C. area, they were equally unforthcoming.
The only reference to a criminal statute and to venue in our conversation with the prosecutors was to the allegation in a recent criminal referral by the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee that alleges (demonstrably falsely) that our client violated 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 in 2023 by lying in his testimony before that Committee about the ICA (specifically about whether a batch of materials known as the "Steele Dossier" was used in the analysis in the ICA).
When asked how they could possibly find venue in the Southern District of Florida for an investigation of alleged false statements that were made in a congressional committee room in Washington, D.C., the prosecutors refused to answer."
[I haven't read the whole thread. I imagine that SFP hasn't pointed out the jurisdictional and timeliness defects.]
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Just the jurisdiction
Popular
Back to top


21






