- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
24 Hours in each of Milan, Venice, Florence, Rome; what are the absolute must-dos of each?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 2:28 pm
Would you skip one to do 48 hours in another?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:02 pm to Olric
quote:
24 Hours in each
the frick
why on earth would you do this?
Are you just going to teleport between these cities?
Just spend 4 days in one
(I personally love Florence the best of these cities. Rome might have the most to do and Venice is a cool experience)
Milan is the most skippable
But again...no.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:21 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Are you just going to teleport between these cities?
Two hour train between each location
I can manage maybe 11 days total in Europe and it may be a one time ever thing
Theoretically I could do 4 days in one spot but I was hoping to hit the highlights of each
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:22 pm to Olric
fly into Milan, that's about all its good for. you might want to see the duomo there, but that's it.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:25 pm to b-rab2
quote:
fly into Milan
This is why its on the list, so maybe the plan should be fly to Milan, train to Venice, ride the Gondola then two days in Florence and Rome
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:50 pm to Olric
quote:
I can manage maybe 11 days total in Europe
Ok, then pick 3 places in the same country (or very close by) to go to in those 11 days. Where are you going for the other 7 days?
quote:
it may be a one time ever thing
Never plan your trip like this because 1) Its unlikely it will be if you don't want it to be, and 2) doing a trip like this will make sure you never go back because you won't want to
quote:
Two hour train between each location
Maybe, but you aren't accounting for getting to the train station, getting to the hotel from the train station, delays, strikes (which happen a lot). Italian trains do not run with the time precision of Japan. Packing and unpacking from each hotel, etc.
If you are deadset on doing this:
Skip Milan.
Pay more for hotel accommodations so that you are centrally located, in a nice hotel with access to the things you want to see, and if you can afford a nice hotel the concierge can be helpful with logistics, getting cabs if you need it, directions, and making restaurant reservations
Book the fastest train.
Use whatever app service they are using in Italy these days instead of public transport in cities. You'll need to conserve as much time as possible
Make restaurant reservations at night so you aren't wasting time looking for places to eat. For lunch you'll have to eat near tourist sites which will feature a lot of shite, so do your research.
In Venice and STAY IN VENICE not one of the other islands or on the mainland. If you can afford to use the private water taxis (very expensive) do so
Venice is lovely at night when the crowds are gone
If you are hellbent on 4 days in Italy, I'd at least cut it to Florence and Rome to be honest though
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:50 pm to Olric
Is this some kind of stupid social media challenge?
The must-dos are for what purpose? Why are they must-dos? To brag to people that you were there? Because this doesn't sound like any kind of vacation. Don't you want to actually experience these cities, instead of just checking them off a list?
As others have indicated, Rome itself has 4 days of major activities:
- St. Peter's
-Vatican Museums and Sistine Chapel
- Colosseum
-Roman Forum
- Pantheon
- St John Lateran (main church of the papacy before St. Peter's)
- St. Peter in Vincoli (to see Michelangelo's Moses),
- Galeria Borghese (magnificent palace full of artistic masterpieces). Could substitute Palazzo Doria Pamphilj for the sake of convenience.
- the catacombs and Appian Way
- Ostia Antica (just outside Rome, extensive ruins of a full Roman town)
- Trajan's villa at Tivoli (also outside of town)
The must-dos are for what purpose? Why are they must-dos? To brag to people that you were there? Because this doesn't sound like any kind of vacation. Don't you want to actually experience these cities, instead of just checking them off a list?
As others have indicated, Rome itself has 4 days of major activities:
- St. Peter's
-Vatican Museums and Sistine Chapel
- Colosseum
-Roman Forum
- Pantheon
- St John Lateran (main church of the papacy before St. Peter's)
- St. Peter in Vincoli (to see Michelangelo's Moses),
- Galeria Borghese (magnificent palace full of artistic masterpieces). Could substitute Palazzo Doria Pamphilj for the sake of convenience.
- the catacombs and Appian Way
- Ostia Antica (just outside Rome, extensive ruins of a full Roman town)
- Trajan's villa at Tivoli (also outside of town)
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:56 pm to GOP_Tiger
We did 10 days in Italy once, did Rome (3), Florence (3), Cinque Terre (2), Venice (2)
And THAT was kinda whirlwind and a bit much. I wished at the end of that that we had more time in Florence
4 days is insane.
And THAT was kinda whirlwind and a bit much. I wished at the end of that that we had more time in Florence
4 days is insane.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:04 pm to Olric
quote:
Would you skip one to do 48 hours in another?
That's an obscene itinerary. If I had that little time, I would just stay in Florence and maybe take one day trip into the countryside.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:05 pm to Olric
quote:
I can manage maybe 11 days total in Europe and it may be a one time ever thing
Don't turn it into a "postcard" trip. Stay one or two places and really experience them. If you try to see everything, you'll experience nothing and walk away trying to figure out what the fuss was about.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:18 pm to Olric
quote:
I can manage maybe 11 days total
We did 11 days.
4 days in Rome (Sposi Novelli)
3.5 days in Florence / Tuscany
Stopped in Bologna for a few hours on the way to Venice
3 days in Venice.
Would do about the same in Rome just because there's so much to do and see.
Would do more in Florence because it was our favorite
Would do less in Venice. To be honest we could have done one day in Venice to do the tour and been happy. Food was good but anticlimactic after coming from Rome and Florence.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:19 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Don't turn it into a "postcard" trip. Stay one or two places and really experience them. If you try to see everything, you'll experience nothing
THIS
Italy time isn't like USA time. Slow down.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:21 pm to Fun Bunch
I've been to all those cities before, but I'm taking my daughter and son-in-law next summer. My daughter went to Milan for 2 days with me in 2022, so it's off the itinerary this time, but I think Milan sometimes doesn't get the credit it deserves. We did:
- Duomo, including the roof
- da Vinci's Last Supper
- Sforzas' palace tour
- Some fun window shopping on the streets of the top designers
- Saw Verdi's Rigoletto at La Scala
And all of those are great, high-level activities. But Milan is still the city to skip out of those four that he listed, if he doesn't have more than a week.
For my trip next summer, we were going to do the classic "Italy in a week" tour of 3 in Rome and 2 each in Florence and Venice, but with adding in 5 days in Umbria and the rest of Tuscany. But I just realized that June 2nd is Republic Day, and it will be difficult to do much sightseeing in Florence that day, so I'm adding a third day for Florence and cutting a day out of my Tuscan sightseeing.
- Duomo, including the roof
- da Vinci's Last Supper
- Sforzas' palace tour
- Some fun window shopping on the streets of the top designers
- Saw Verdi's Rigoletto at La Scala
And all of those are great, high-level activities. But Milan is still the city to skip out of those four that he listed, if he doesn't have more than a week.
For my trip next summer, we were going to do the classic "Italy in a week" tour of 3 in Rome and 2 each in Florence and Venice, but with adding in 5 days in Umbria and the rest of Tuscany. But I just realized that June 2nd is Republic Day, and it will be difficult to do much sightseeing in Florence that day, so I'm adding a third day for Florence and cutting a day out of my Tuscan sightseeing.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:25 pm to TheBoo
quote:
We did 11 days.
Yeah that would be great but he isn’t doing that
He’s doing 7 days somewhere else in Europe and then wants to do 4 days in Italy where he spends one day in each city
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:28 pm to Fun Bunch
I think you all have convinced me to reverse course. Italy was always the place i wanted to see most so no sense in rushing it.
I really do appreciate all the responses.
I really do appreciate all the responses.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:29 pm to Fun Bunch
My fault, misread.
There's no way that juice will be worth the squeeze.
quote:
4 days in Italy where he spends one day in each city
There's no way that juice will be worth the squeeze.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:30 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
He’s doing 7 days somewhere else in Europe
London, Dublin, Paris, Madrid, Barcelona, Amsterdam, and Berlin, maybe?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:31 pm to Olric
So why not do your entire trip there
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:31 pm to Fun Bunch
I will be now; that's what I was trying to say
Popular
Back to top

9





