- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Roman Polanski
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:50 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:50 am
Here I thought it was a one time case where things got out of hand. Nope. Dude was worse than Jeffrey Epstein and his victims were younger. One reportedly at the age of 10.
Grok summary
I’ve seen who Hollywood cheers for…
* The one case everybody might remember? The one that made him flee to France… She was 13 he was 43. Not 16 going on 17 and “close enough“ to be considered legal in some jurisdiction. 13, giving her drugs and alcohol… And it was a theme with this guy, not a one time situation.
Grok summary
I’ve seen who Hollywood cheers for…
* The one case everybody might remember? The one that made him flee to France… She was 13 he was 43. Not 16 going on 17 and “close enough“ to be considered legal in some jurisdiction. 13, giving her drugs and alcohol… And it was a theme with this guy, not a one time situation.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 10:26 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:19 am to Cleathecat
Is that why the down votes? Or do we have fans or the young ones on this board? Who think he did nothing wrong? Probably double liked Cuties on their Netflix rating.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:24 am to SouthEasternKaiju
If I had it my way we'd shoot pedos.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:28 am to Cleathecat
Then I guess we’d have to delete Quentin Tarantino too. He thinks Roman did nothing wrong, and talks about how common it is with those 13-year-old party girls.
Hollywood cheers because when they see Polanski , they’re looking in the mirror.
The mirror hung on a wall. Just like all maps should be.
Hollywood cheers because when they see Polanski , they’re looking in the mirror.
The mirror hung on a wall. Just like all maps should be.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:24 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Yep. I think I heard him on Howard Stern once denying to answer whether or not it was wrong to frick little girls. Refused to say it was wrong.
Then I guess we’d have to delete Quentin Tarantino too. He thinks Roman did nothing wrong, and talks about how common it is with those 13-year-old party girls
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:51 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:I’m not trying to hijack the thread, but I thought Cutie’s did a great job at illustrating how over sexualized young girls are becoming. At least, that’s what I took from it. I didn’t think that it was a glorification of that particular groupthink at all.
Probably double liked Cuties on their Netflix rating.
Getting back to your OP, it is odd what particular issues around which Hollywood chooses to circle their wagons.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:18 pm to alajones
Well, that’s the catch 22. Talking about a topic (child sexuality) but using actual children as their on screen ages, not older actors who look the part. Then the future realization that there was a casting call of probably 100’s of 9-12 year old girls who took part in the ’acting’ of twerking and such.
But it’s French….
Sure, use that excuse.
But it’s French….
Sure, use that excuse.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:27 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Precisely
Hollywood cheers because when they see Polanski , they’re looking in the mirror.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:33 pm to blueboy
Wonder why they stan so hard for Polanski but get all pretend angry about Epstein.
Really makes you think.
Really makes you think.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:57 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
The defense of Polanski by many in Hollywood has always been fricked up. I would bet some of the chicks who defended Polanski were front and center screaming about MeToo.
The idea that it is fine to give a 13 year old quaaludes and sodomize her is just wrong. Downvoting pedos on TD disagree.
I don't care if the authorities pulled the rug out from under Polanski with the deal. They should never have offered him a deal.
I will give Angelica Huston credit that she backed Polanski and she was anti-metoo and thinks most of the women complaining used sex to get what they wanted. At least she wasn't hypocritical. Although she was dead wrong backing pill pushing arse raping Polanski.
Lol. Harvey Weinstein signed the Hollywood petition to allow Polanski back into the country.
Oh I'm sorry. He made some good movies so that offsets drugging and raping a teen...... not
The idea that it is fine to give a 13 year old quaaludes and sodomize her is just wrong. Downvoting pedos on TD disagree.
I don't care if the authorities pulled the rug out from under Polanski with the deal. They should never have offered him a deal.
I will give Angelica Huston credit that she backed Polanski and she was anti-metoo and thinks most of the women complaining used sex to get what they wanted. At least she wasn't hypocritical. Although she was dead wrong backing pill pushing arse raping Polanski.
Lol. Harvey Weinstein signed the Hollywood petition to allow Polanski back into the country.
Oh I'm sorry. He made some good movies so that offsets drugging and raping a teen...... not
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:01 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:They know he's not going to release everything because he's protecting Israel, so they know they can taunt him endlessly over it. That's why.
Wonder why they stan so hard for Polanski but get all pretend angry about Epstein.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:21 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
thinks most of the women complaining used sex to get what they wanted
She's right. That's how Hollywood has worked since the 20s. Some of them are just groupies that like to say they had sex with famous actors, like Roman's good friend Jack Nicholson, instead of musicians. Speaking of musicians, is anyone gonna cancel Elvis Presley, Jimmy Page, Ted Nugent, or Chuck Barry? At least they didn't pee on anyone. Well maybe Chuck Barry did.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:29 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:Why have so many TD posters shown indignation for pedos yet brush off clear associations with Epstein.
Wonder why they stan so hard for Polanski but get all pretend angry about Epstein.
Human nature is fricked up.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:32 pm to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
yet brush off clear associations with Epstein.
What evidence do you have which would suggest any such thing is true?
Before I level you with your assumed claims, I want YOU to answer first. Just to be clear we're talking about the same things.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:40 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
What evidence do you have which would suggest any such thing is true?
Before I level you with your assumed claims, I want YOU to answer first. Just to be clear we're talking about the same things.
This isn't the place to go into that, I'll just say that if you can't see what's obvious then consult my previous post about human nature.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:51 pm to Diseasefreeforall
quote:
what's obvious
Coward. You went there, but if you can't back it up, then fokk off.
I suspect where you'd want to go with this, but time and time again your little fairy tale has been debunked. And by multiple sources. Including principle individuals themselves who'd know and testified as such.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:42 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Probably talking about Clinton
Posted on 12/13/25 at 12:08 am to tigersmanager
Deflecting and in turn defending Polanski the pedo with a whataboutism he has zero proof of. You shouldn’t interact with these people, they are evil.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 12:09 am
Popular
Back to top


5









