Started By
Message

Roman Polanski

Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:50 am
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:50 am
Here I thought it was a one time case where things got out of hand. Nope. Dude was worse than Jeffrey Epstein and his victims were younger. One reportedly at the age of 10.

Grok summary

I’ve seen who Hollywood cheers for…


* The one case everybody might remember? The one that made him flee to France… She was 13 he was 43. Not 16 going on 17 and “close enough“ to be considered legal in some jurisdiction. 13, giving her drugs and alcohol… And it was a theme with this guy, not a one time situation.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 10:26 am
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
1567 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:51 am to
He's German
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
34490 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:55 am to
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:19 am to
Is that why the down votes? Or do we have fans or the young ones on this board? Who think he did nothing wrong? Probably double liked Cuties on their Netflix rating.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 1:23 pm
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
1567 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:24 am to
If I had it my way we'd shoot pedos.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:28 am to
Then I guess we’d have to delete Quentin Tarantino too. He thinks Roman did nothing wrong, and talks about how common it is with those 13-year-old party girls.

Hollywood cheers because when they see Polanski , they’re looking in the mirror.


The mirror hung on a wall. Just like all maps should be.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 1:24 pm
Posted by King George
Member since Dec 2013
5981 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Then I guess we’d have to delete Quentin Tarantino too. He thinks Roman did nothing wrong, and talks about how common it is with those 13-year-old party girls
Yep. I think I heard him on Howard Stern once denying to answer whether or not it was wrong to frick little girls. Refused to say it was wrong.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35752 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Probably double liked Cuties on their Netflix rating.
I’m not trying to hijack the thread, but I thought Cutie’s did a great job at illustrating how over sexualized young girls are becoming. At least, that’s what I took from it. I didn’t think that it was a glorification of that particular groupthink at all.


Getting back to your OP, it is odd what particular issues around which Hollywood chooses to circle their wagons.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 3:56 pm
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:18 pm to
Well, that’s the catch 22. Talking about a topic (child sexuality) but using actual children as their on screen ages, not older actors who look the part. Then the future realization that there was a casting call of probably 100’s of 9-12 year old girls who took part in the ’acting’ of twerking and such.

But it’s French….

Sure, use that excuse.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 4:19 pm
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63220 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Hollywood cheers because when they see Polanski , they’re looking in the mirror.

Precisely
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:33 pm to
Wonder why they stan so hard for Polanski but get all pretend angry about Epstein.


Really makes you think.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41046 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:57 pm to
The defense of Polanski by many in Hollywood has always been fricked up. I would bet some of the chicks who defended Polanski were front and center screaming about MeToo.

The idea that it is fine to give a 13 year old quaaludes and sodomize her is just wrong. Downvoting pedos on TD disagree.

I don't care if the authorities pulled the rug out from under Polanski with the deal. They should never have offered him a deal.

I will give Angelica Huston credit that she backed Polanski and she was anti-metoo and thinks most of the women complaining used sex to get what they wanted. At least she wasn't hypocritical. Although she was dead wrong backing pill pushing arse raping Polanski.

Lol. Harvey Weinstein signed the Hollywood petition to allow Polanski back into the country.

Oh I'm sorry. He made some good movies so that offsets drugging and raping a teen...... not

Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63220 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Wonder why they stan so hard for Polanski but get all pretend angry about Epstein.

They know he's not going to release everything because he's protecting Israel, so they know they can taunt him endlessly over it. That's why.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
41642 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

thinks most of the women complaining used sex to get what they wanted

She's right. That's how Hollywood has worked since the 20s. Some of them are just groupies that like to say they had sex with famous actors, like Roman's good friend Jack Nicholson, instead of musicians. Speaking of musicians, is anyone gonna cancel Elvis Presley, Jimmy Page, Ted Nugent, or Chuck Barry? At least they didn't pee on anyone. Well maybe Chuck Barry did.
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
7203 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Wonder why they stan so hard for Polanski but get all pretend angry about Epstein.

Why have so many TD posters shown indignation for pedos yet brush off clear associations with Epstein.

Human nature is fricked up.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

yet brush off clear associations with Epstein.


What evidence do you have which would suggest any such thing is true?

Before I level you with your assumed claims, I want YOU to answer first. Just to be clear we're talking about the same things.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 5:33 pm
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
7203 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

What evidence do you have which would suggest any such thing is true?

Before I level you with your assumed claims, I want YOU to answer first. Just to be clear we're talking about the same things.

This isn't the place to go into that, I'll just say that if you can't see what's obvious then consult my previous post about human nature.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42675 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

what's obvious


Coward. You went there, but if you can't back it up, then fokk off.

I suspect where you'd want to go with this, but time and time again your little fairy tale has been debunked. And by multiple sources. Including principle individuals themselves who'd know and testified as such.

Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
9280 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:42 pm to
Probably talking about Clinton
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66575 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 12:08 am to
Deflecting and in turn defending Polanski the pedo with a whataboutism he has zero proof of. You shouldn’t interact with these people, they are evil.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 12:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram