Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Thoughts on LNG stocks?

Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:50 am
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6921 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:50 am
What’s y’all’s thoughts on LNG stocks? Specifically VG? Will these rebound? They’ve plummeted over the past few weeks.
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
32710 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 8:18 am to
load up... LNG will only get bigger over time

We should expect an oil glut in the coming 12-24 months

--If I wanted growth + upside, I’d lean on companies like NextDecade (for potential big growth if projects succeed) or Cheniere (for relative stability + growth via expansion).
--If I preferred a safer, infrastructure-backed play (less volatility, some LNG exposure indirectly), Kinder Morgan or ConocoPhillips offer blended risk/return.
--I’d treat this sector as long-term and speculative: maybe build a small “starter” position now, and add more if LNG demand outlook strengthens or project milestones are met.
Posted by frogtown
Member since Aug 2017
5753 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 8:36 am to
quote:

What’s y’all’s thoughts on LNG stocks?


Canadian LNG will perform better than US LNG. Just my opinion.

The price of AECO is expected to double in the next two to three years as they are building pipelines and processing plants. It is easier to ship to the Asia market from Western Canada.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21193 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 10:42 am to
There’s several I’m interested in OKE being #1 also looking hard at USAI for a sector ETF
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:03 am to
One must ask themselves -- what drives a LNG export company?

The spread between domestic gas and international gas.

Domestic gas is on an upward trajectory.

International gas isn't.

Meanwhile, there is way too much capacity being built.

So what happens when you have 2x the amount of capacity that is needed to meet demand?

Also OKE is not an LNG stock

VG could very well go bankrupt in 5+ years
This post was edited on 12/10/25 at 11:05 am
Posted by jfw3535
South of Bunkie
Member since Mar 2008
5432 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:03 pm to
My investment in LNG (actual stock symbol) is up 737.82% since I initially bought it, so I'm pretty happy with it.
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 12:12 pm to
Cheniere has been a huge winner. They had a gigantic first mover advantage and did a wonderful job contracting, constructing, operating, just generally executing.

Most of those gains happened early or post COVID sell off. That was the easy stuff.

I mean the stock is down y/y
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
6569 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 1:30 pm to
There is so much debt being taken on by these companies. (especially VG) They are massively overbuilding capacity and not even worried about the ROI.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
38629 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

They are massively overbuilding capacity and not even worried about the ROI.



You think they are just waiting for the next period of time where they will just be able to pick up and run full speed? It might be ten years but they want that pad ready and raring to go is my only estimation.
Posted by BayouBengals21
Member since Mar 2020
192 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 3:08 pm to
Aren’t these LNG plants signing 20 year contracts on set prices before the facility is ever built?
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

You think they are just waiting for the next period of time where they will just be able to pick up and run full speed? It might be ten years but they want that pad ready and raring to go is my only estimation.


So sink multiple billions into the ground and hope it’s needed later down the line? That’s not how capital providers work my friend!
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/10/25 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Aren’t these LNG plants signing 20 year contracts on set prices before the facility is ever built?


They do sign up capacity at fixed tolling rates, but not for 100% of nameplate capacity. They all have merchant arms that market around their open capacity. Example — VG contracts 75% of their capacity and uses the remaining 25% to essentially work the domestic / international spread, which is compressing.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21193 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:25 am to
Sorry you are correct OKE is midstream and that’s what I’m concentrating on not pure LNG sticks
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/11/25 at 4:39 pm to
OKE has gotten pretty beat up over the past year or so. And they deserved it for some reckless M&A. But I bought around $70, though, which ultimately is a <10x EBITDA multiple.
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
10801 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 1:49 pm to
LNG is taking a beating as well. What is up?
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 8:20 am to
Domestic gas prices vs. international gas prices

I sound like a broken record

Domestic gas went from <$3 to >$4
International gas went from >$15 to <$10

Right now, the spread is about $5. That is kind of where the fulcrum begins where you make or don't make money on marketing volumes and also brings into the conversation questions around recontracting (e.g. original contracts were struck when the spread was $8-10, now it's far lower, etc). Also, there are a million new export facilities being built.

So, fundamentals breaking down, more capacity coming online, no bueno.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
15987 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 4:31 pm to
I like cheniere more than I do venture.
Cheniere is a cleaner play.
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
285 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 4:32 pm to
Cheniere is a cleaner play in every single way possible.

Execution, management integrity, business model, balance sheet, etc.

VG is trash. Their fees on contracted volumes are lower than anyone. They rely on trading basically. And they are incredibly over levered. And there is still a big unknown with pending lawsuits and such. And they claim that they can get volumes to above like 40% of nameplate capacity on their trains... ok buddy sure, would that even be economically accretive at today's spreads? Eh

This is what happens when a banker and a lawyer from NYC get together and want to make a boat load of money for themselves.
This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 4:35 pm
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
15987 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

This is what happens when a banker and a lawyer from NYC get together and want to make a boat load of money for themselves.


Yeah and the pay for the 2 founders/CEO’s is obnoxious
$36 and $28 million a year respectively.
This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 6:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram