- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Rising role of a GM for Universities
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:37 pm
Its a very interesting happening going on right now. The GM is nearly almost your Recruiting coordinator these days. Not sure how boots on the ground they are. I'm not sure where i'm trying to go with this conversation but i will say with coordinators starting to get paid 2-3 million on the higher ends, it will be interesting to watch what the elite GM's start to make. HC making 10-15 millions, Key staff making 2ish each, GM's will start to have a very firm argument for their value at schools at LSU's, Ohio St's etc...
This sort of is Frank related with everyone saying making him a recruiting only title on paper, that is sort of the role being filled by GM's these days. Glasscock waters down the need for a recruiting only figure head.
This sort of is Frank related with everyone saying making him a recruiting only title on paper, that is sort of the role being filled by GM's these days. Glasscock waters down the need for a recruiting only figure head.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:39 pm to Chad504boy
It's great. My son is in school getting a business degree with a minor in Sports Management to try to go this route. I wish this was an option when I was in college. Now there are exponentially more GM jobs than just in pro sports.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:47 pm to Chad504boy
TBH I’m not 100% clear on what role college GM’s play right now.
Are they responsible for evaluation? Ranking/selection of players? Are they just managing the money?
The recruiting rules complicate things as well. My understanding is that coaches are the only staff members allowed to participate in any off-campus recruiting, including in-person evaluation.
I’m sure everyone is still figuring out what exact structure works best, but I’d be curious to know what level of responsibility GM’s are being given at various top-tier schools.
Are they responsible for evaluation? Ranking/selection of players? Are they just managing the money?
The recruiting rules complicate things as well. My understanding is that coaches are the only staff members allowed to participate in any off-campus recruiting, including in-person evaluation.
I’m sure everyone is still figuring out what exact structure works best, but I’d be curious to know what level of responsibility GM’s are being given at various top-tier schools.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:49 pm to lostinbr
quote:
TBH I’m not 100% clear on what role college GM’s play right now.
Its not an easy role, very complex, seems to be a lot of everything.
ChatGPT answer:
A General Manager (GM) for a university football program is essentially the program’s chief operations and personnel strategist, similar to—but not identical to—a GM in professional sports. This role has become common in major Division I programs as college football has become more complex, competitive, and business-like.
Here’s a clear breakdown of what a GM typically does:
Core Responsibilities of a University Football GM
1. Roster Management & Personnel Strategy
Oversees the overall roster plan: scholarships, positional needs, depth charts, redshirting strategy.
Tracks roster numbers with the head coach to ensure balance and long-term sustainability.
Works closely with coaches on recruiting priorities.
2. Recruiting Oversight
Leads or coordinates the recruiting department (recruiting staff, scouting, analysts).
Develops recruiting board and grading systems for evaluating prospects.
Determines recruiting regions, position priorities, and annual recruiting class strategy.
Oversees campus visits, player evaluation, and communication plans.
3. NIL & Transfer Portal Strategy
(Varies by school policy — the GM cannot negotiate NIL deals directly but coordinates the strategy)
Helps manage transfer-portal recruiting strategy and timing.
Coordinates with compliance staff on NIL rules and roster impact.
Advises head coach on competitive roster building under NIL realities.
4. Scouting & Analytics
Oversees opponent scouting and internal self-scout processes.
Uses data tools to evaluate recruits, transfers, and team performance.
Provides analytical support for in-season decisions and off-season planning.
5. Administrative & Operational Oversight
Manages logistics for key parts of the program—recruiting weekends, camps, evaluations.
Works with compliance to ensure all recruiting actions follow NCAA rules.
Helps manage staff organization and communication between departments.
6. Budget & Resource Management
Helps allocate budgets for recruiting, travel, technology, and scouting.
Advises athletic department leaders and head coach on cost-effective strategies.
7. Liaison Between Head Coach & Program Departments
Bridges communication between:
Strength & conditioning
Sports medicine
Recruiting
Academics
Support staff
Compliance
Keeps the head coach informed while reducing their administrative load.
In Short
The GM is the architect and manager of the football program’s operational and roster strategy.
The head coach sets the vision and culture; the GM ensures the entire machine runs efficiently and stays built for long-term success.
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:59 pm to lostinbr
Different general managers do different things depending what program they are at.
Glasscock will oversee the day-to-day operations of Ole Miss' player personnel, recruiting, performance analytics, academic support and other areas. He comes to Ole Miss following three seasons at Texas from 2021-23 as the director of player personnel.
Glasscock has spent a decade overseeing all facets of recruiting and player personnel at Power Five programs. Prior to Texas, he was the director of player personnel at NC State, where he led recruiting activities and roster management from 2017-20. Before his time in Raleigh, Glasscock was the director of recruiting operations at Minnesota from 2011-16. In 2014, national recruiting analyst Tom Lemming named him one of five national directors of recruiting operations of the year.
Austin Thomas seemed to have more of a fundraising and nil role at lsu. It seemed like he put in that nfl model of each position group having a certain amount of money.
Glasscock sounds like a much better personnel guy imo.
Glasscock will oversee the day-to-day operations of Ole Miss' player personnel, recruiting, performance analytics, academic support and other areas. He comes to Ole Miss following three seasons at Texas from 2021-23 as the director of player personnel.
Glasscock has spent a decade overseeing all facets of recruiting and player personnel at Power Five programs. Prior to Texas, he was the director of player personnel at NC State, where he led recruiting activities and roster management from 2017-20. Before his time in Raleigh, Glasscock was the director of recruiting operations at Minnesota from 2011-16. In 2014, national recruiting analyst Tom Lemming named him one of five national directors of recruiting operations of the year.
Austin Thomas seemed to have more of a fundraising and nil role at lsu. It seemed like he put in that nfl model of each position group having a certain amount of money.
Glasscock sounds like a much better personnel guy imo.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:02 pm to Chalkywhite84
Yeah Andrew Luck (GM at Stanford) is obviously doing a very different job than a Michael Lombardi (GM at UNC).
The role is probably very different for every school & depends on relationship between AD, GM, & HC
The role is probably very different for every school & depends on relationship between AD, GM, & HC
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:10 pm to Chad504boy
Yeah I suppose that’s about what I expected.
I imagine a huge part of the job is really just managing the money - both in terms of revenue share dollars and coordination with 3rd party NIL. That has to be an enormous amount of work (ant least this time of year) and I’m sure coaches don’t really want anything to do with it if they can help it.
My big question is how much responsibility college GM’s have for true evaluation/roster building compared to the NFL. My gut says that we haven’t reached the point yet where the GM build the roster and the coaching staff coaches them. It seems like some of the recruiting rules would need to change for it to really turn into the NFL role.
But I know we’re still in the infant stages of this arrangement. Didn’t Florida just hire an ex-NFL GM? Idk, it’s interesting.
I imagine a huge part of the job is really just managing the money - both in terms of revenue share dollars and coordination with 3rd party NIL. That has to be an enormous amount of work (ant least this time of year) and I’m sure coaches don’t really want anything to do with it if they can help it.
My big question is how much responsibility college GM’s have for true evaluation/roster building compared to the NFL. My gut says that we haven’t reached the point yet where the GM build the roster and the coaching staff coaches them. It seems like some of the recruiting rules would need to change for it to really turn into the NFL role.
But I know we’re still in the infant stages of this arrangement. Didn’t Florida just hire an ex-NFL GM? Idk, it’s interesting.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:27 pm to lostinbr
quote:it doesn’t seem that complex to me. No contracts, caps or real long term commitments. Hell you don’t even know who is available till late in the game and I’d imagine the hc has the power.
sure everyone is still figuring out what exact structure works best, but I’d be curious to know what level of responsibility GM’s are being given at various top-tier schools.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:35 pm to lostinbr
basically, work NIL, player agents, in the recruitment process.
Key responsibilities
Roster management:
Overseeing the construction of the roster, including both high school recruiting and managing player movement through the transfer portal.
Day-to-day operations:
Managing the daily operations of the program, working with the head coach on staffing, budget, and overall efficiency.
Personnel and scouting: Focusing on player acquisition, scouting, and managing the scouting department.
Strategic coordination:
Playing a key role in the strategy around Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals and coordinating with agents.
Financial management:
Handling aspects of finances, including managing a potential salary cap as the role evolves with revenue sharing in college sports.
Compliance:
Working with the team to ensure compliance with NCAA regulations.
Key responsibilities
Roster management:
Overseeing the construction of the roster, including both high school recruiting and managing player movement through the transfer portal.
Day-to-day operations:
Managing the daily operations of the program, working with the head coach on staffing, budget, and overall efficiency.
Personnel and scouting: Focusing on player acquisition, scouting, and managing the scouting department.
Strategic coordination:
Playing a key role in the strategy around Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals and coordinating with agents.
Financial management:
Handling aspects of finances, including managing a potential salary cap as the role evolves with revenue sharing in college sports.
Compliance:
Working with the team to ensure compliance with NCAA regulations.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 2:36 pm to lostinbr
What I'd be curious about is how each team determines "value" - the algorithms they use to deduce how much money a player is worth. I'm sure depending upon the system, that value calculation is very different for speed vs. size vs. smarts and instincts, etc.
Which is what makes this so interesting to me. that is why this could be very different from school to school and team to team in pro sports because of what they value.
I looked at the GM's in pro football and basketball and more than 50% at the time I did the math were not athletes...they were business, economics, law majors. So, with non-athletes making the decisions they must have ways to or ideas on how to calculate value, just like they indicated in moneyball.
Which is what makes this so interesting to me. that is why this could be very different from school to school and team to team in pro sports because of what they value.
I looked at the GM's in pro football and basketball and more than 50% at the time I did the math were not athletes...they were business, economics, law majors. So, with non-athletes making the decisions they must have ways to or ideas on how to calculate value, just like they indicated in moneyball.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 3:26 pm to dennistracy
quote:
What I'd be curious about is how each team determines "value" - the algorithms they use to deduce how much money a player is worth. I'm sure depending upon the system, that value calculation is very different for speed vs. size vs. smarts and instincts, etc.
Which is what makes this so interesting to me. that is why this could be very different from school to school and team to team in pro sports because of what they value.
It’s probably the Wild West right now. And it has to be harder to some extent to completely buy into the moneyball approach because unlike the NFL, the quality of data in college recruiting is all over the place. How do you account for the difference between LA vs. MS vs. TX competition in high school, or 1A vs. 5A? You’re also dealing with less quality, standardization, and availability of film, stats, measurables, etc.
And then there’s the character aspect. While NFL GM’s certainly deal with it as well, surely the average free agent or draft prospect has way fewer character unknowns than a kid out of high school.
I know there’s a lot of work being done on using AI for various football applications right now, especially at the NFL level. Seems like scouting is an obvious area where AI/ML should be able to make a big impact. But you’re still dealing with the data problem for HS recruits.
I think the end result is that it’s probably at least a little harder to go all-in on the analytical approach in college, at least when it comes to high school recruiting. But I’d love to be a fly on the wall in some of those buildings to see how they’re working through it.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 4:52 pm to Chad504boy
I’ll give the quickest summary of what a College football GM does.
Whatever the Head Coach needs assistance with in the fine details department to button up all the loose ends that a HC doesn’t have the time to deal with.
I can guarantee a role like Glasscock for LK here, would be:
Managing the Roster and assuring all the players are handling their school work. (Where it is streamlined up to him thru other personnel working in conjunction with him and feeding him the summarized results)
Eligibility concerns
NIL budget management
Injury report consolidation & making sure the roster stays healthy
Off the field issues and handling the issues to buffer as “go between” with the HC
Basically keeping the HC up to speed with “clear and present dangers or concerns”
Organizing travel & meals for the team (with assistance from assistants in those departments)
He’s more of a micro-manager of the overall structure of the team and program & takes a ton off the plate of the HC.
I guarantee GLASSCOCK was a top priority for LK to come here with him and for LSU to make sure “his GM” is happy
With his contract and tools to work with.
The GM is the HC’s right hand guy for off the field day to day.
Whatever the Head Coach needs assistance with in the fine details department to button up all the loose ends that a HC doesn’t have the time to deal with.
I can guarantee a role like Glasscock for LK here, would be:
Managing the Roster and assuring all the players are handling their school work. (Where it is streamlined up to him thru other personnel working in conjunction with him and feeding him the summarized results)
Eligibility concerns
NIL budget management
Injury report consolidation & making sure the roster stays healthy
Off the field issues and handling the issues to buffer as “go between” with the HC
Basically keeping the HC up to speed with “clear and present dangers or concerns”
Organizing travel & meals for the team (with assistance from assistants in those departments)
He’s more of a micro-manager of the overall structure of the team and program & takes a ton off the plate of the HC.
I guarantee GLASSCOCK was a top priority for LK to come here with him and for LSU to make sure “his GM” is happy
With his contract and tools to work with.
The GM is the HC’s right hand guy for off the field day to day.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 5:57 pm to Chad504boy
The way things are going, I wouldn’t be surprised if the GM role eventually eclipses the head coach in scope and even value. Assuming NIL, portal, mega-conferences, TV money et al continue to grow, assembling and managing the “program” will be much more involved than preparing the team to play. It will also require a different skill set from most coaches - especially at the big football powers. Pay GMs like the top tier coaches are now, and pay coaches much less to specialize in X’s & O’s.
Popular
Back to top
4







