- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
On 9/17/25, Massie named one perp and said there were several other men with FBI 302s
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:14 pm
UODATE:
Karma's a bitch. I complained that another poster had made the mistake of posting something as "breaking" when it was actually six months old.
I just made the same mistake. I got fooled by an YouTube short that had comments from two days ago. I thought it was of Massie from this week.
I'm updating this to show Massie's full questions to Kash Patel from September. Still useful, because Massie names one new possible perp. He also said there were several other men named as suspects. He identified them by attributes, but not names.
He asked Patel if he had reviewed the 302s and ruled these men out as posdibly having committed crimes. Patel said he hadn't reviewed them personally, but that agents in two field offices had and they had concluded that no further investigations were warranted.
Personally, I thought no other possible perps would be named...and that the files would be a nothing burger. If Massie is telling the truth, under the new law, many new names will emerge. Are they going to be tried in the court of public opinion???
Anyhow, I apologize for my mistake.
Youtube Link
Karma's a bitch. I complained that another poster had made the mistake of posting something as "breaking" when it was actually six months old.
I just made the same mistake. I got fooled by an YouTube short that had comments from two days ago. I thought it was of Massie from this week.
I'm updating this to show Massie's full questions to Kash Patel from September. Still useful, because Massie names one new possible perp. He also said there were several other men named as suspects. He identified them by attributes, but not names.
He asked Patel if he had reviewed the 302s and ruled these men out as posdibly having committed crimes. Patel said he hadn't reviewed them personally, but that agents in two field offices had and they had concluded that no further investigations were warranted.
Personally, I thought no other possible perps would be named...and that the files would be a nothing burger. If Massie is telling the truth, under the new law, many new names will emerge. Are they going to be tried in the court of public opinion???
Anyhow, I apologize for my mistake.
Youtube Link
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:16 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Staley... that's it?
IvoryB... I am disappoint.
IvoryB... I am disappoint.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:17 pm to IvoryBillMatt
When was this hearing?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:18 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Isn’t this old
Yep. TDS crew trying to keep this topic rolling as long as possible. If Massie was actually serious about getting the cabal he wouldn’t have included a way for Bondi to redact and withhold whatever she wanted in HIS bill.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:18 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The clip shows one name being dropped. When was this hearing?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:19 pm to Jugbow
He referenced a senate hearing and Q&A that I think was at least 2 months ago, maybe?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:20 pm to SallysHuman
Bruh…
Shut up.
Names are getting dropped.
What/who are you wanting to protect?
Don’t answer that. Because you’re a sex trafficking accomplice if you do.
Shut up.
Names are getting dropped.
What/who are you wanting to protect?
Don’t answer that. Because you’re a sex trafficking accomplice if you do.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:22 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Massie I mean McCarthy
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:22 pm to Jyrdis
quote:
Names are getting dropped.
One name... on a teaser video suggesting 20... that is Lord knows how old.
I believe the kids call that click bait.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:25 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
One name... on a teaser video suggesting 20... that is Lord knows how old. I believe the kids call that click bait.
Lord help you when several of your heros get named.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:27 pm to Jyrdis
quote:
Lord help you when several of your heros get named.
I don't know who you think I am... but you're wrong.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Massie fan clutching at straws to support Massie?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:38 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Massie fan clutching at straws to support Massie?
Massie reminds me of Adam kinzinger in that clip. He’s the best player on the Dems team as a Republican.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:47 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Staley was known years ago.
Nothingburger.
Nothingburger.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:52 pm to SallysHuman
Sorry Sallys, I have updated...see corrections in original.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:55 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Sorry Sallys, I have updated...see corrections in original.
No prob... there is a LOT of regurgitation going on right now.
I can't watch a whole thing right now- tired, drinkin and feeling silly.
I will ask you to reiterate... Staley is the only name in that video? Rest of dudes are descriptive?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:55 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Massie fan clutching at straws to support Massie?
I generally like Massie, but I thought he was bluffing on the new names of possible perps that would come out if all the Epstein files were released.
If the files are released in accordance with the new law, and Massie is wrong about new possible perps, I will lead the chorus in denouncing Massie as a grandstanding fraud.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:56 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Dude... you got anchored.
Popular
Back to top

9






