- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Federal court blocks Texas from using new congressional gerrymander in 2026 midterms
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:27 pm
quote:
Texas cannot use its new congressional map for the 2026 election and will instead need to stick with the lines passed in 2021, a three-judge panel ruled Tuesday.
The decision is a major blow for Republicans, in Texas and nationally, who pushed through this unusual mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump. They were hoping the new map would yield control of 30 of the state’s 38 congressional districts — up from the 25 they currently hold — and help protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House.
“The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics,” U.S. Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote in the ruling striking down the new lines. “To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.”
Brown ordered that the 2026 congressional election “shall proceed under the map that the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021.” The case will likely be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but time is short: Candidates only have until Dec. 8 to file for the upcoming election.
The map cleared the GOP-controlled Legislature in August and was quickly signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott. Several advocacy groups sued over the new district lines, saying lawmakers intentionally diluted the voting power of Black and Hispanic Texans and drew racially gerrymandered maps. Over the course of a nine-day hearing in El Paso earlier this month, they aimed to convince the judges that it was in voters’ best interest to shelve the new map until a full trial could be held.
“A federal court just stopped one of the most brazen attempts to steal our democracy that Texas has ever seen,” Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu, D-Houston, said in a statement. “Greg Abbott and his Republican cronies tried to silence Texans’ voices to placate Donald Trump, but now have delivered him absolutely nothing.”
quote:
It was not immediately clear if the state still has a legal path to restoring the new map in time for 2026. Unlike most federal lawsuits, which are heard by a single district judge and then appealed to a circuit court, voting rights lawsuits are initially heard by two district judges and one circuit judge, and their ruling can only be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Tuesday’s decision came from a three-judge panel made up of Brown; U.S. District Judge David Guaderrama, a Barack Obama appointee; and Judge Jerry Smith, who was appointed to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by Ronald Reagan. The ruling comes 10 days into the monthlong period when candidates can sign up for the March primary.
https://www.texastribune.org/2025/11/18/texas-redistricting-ruling-lawsuit-el-paso-court-2026-midterms/
This makes the Indiana senate GOP even more discusting.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:28 pm to loogaroo
Federal Court, huh?
Wonder what their political affiliation is?
Wonder what their political affiliation is?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:30 pm to lsusteve1
Judge Brown is a Trump appointee and a republican
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:30 pm to loogaroo
quote:
“The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics,” U.S. Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote in the ruling striking down the new lines. “To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.”
So federal judges get to demand race be used to gerrymander but then get to pick and choose what they consider is racially gerrymandered when a legislature redraws lines?
I'll need some quotes from the Constitution where this power was allotted to the judiciary.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:31 pm to cas4t
quote:
Judge Brown is a Trump appointee
I wonder how much money he made off this.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:31 pm to lsusteve1
2 Republicans 1 Democrat
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:32 pm to Bard
Gerrymandering only is allowed for more Democratic representation.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:33 pm to Bard
All that bullshite the TX Dems did and a three judge panel did what they wanted in one hearing. 
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:34 pm to lsuson
quote:
lol now do Californias!
I'd expect a judge will do the same to them, citing the Texas decision as precedent.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:35 pm to loogaroo
Perfect so Cali is also blocked
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:35 pm to Bard
So California gets to redraw districts for political purposes but Texas does not.
Please explain.
As it stands now CA just picked up a net 5 new dem seats due to the prop 50 bs.
Please explain.
As it stands now CA just picked up a net 5 new dem seats due to the prop 50 bs.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:36 pm to Vandergriff
quote:
Please explain.
The argument will be that CAs was voted in and was not redrawn based on race
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:36 pm to loogaroo
So idiot Jasmine gets her district back ?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:36 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Perfect so Cali is also blocked
No
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:37 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Perfect so Cali is also blocked
Sheeet...watch those frickers get away with it.
It's like every facet of government wants to get Trump so they can keep the grift going. Dems and GOP.
This shite pisses me off to no end.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:37 pm to Bard
quote:
So federal judges get to demand race be used to gerrymander but then get to pick and choose what they consider is racially gerrymandered when a legislature redraws lines?
Truth
quote:
Two R’s and One D
So, another example of soft arse R’s not doing what needs to be done.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:38 pm to cas4t
quote:
The argument will be that CAs was voted in and was not redrawn based on race
Wasn’t the original map (2021) based off just this?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:38 pm to The Torch
quote:
So idiot Jasmine gets her district back ?
That and we probably lose the house now that Indiana fricked us as well as these judges.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 1:39 pm to loogaroo
You really have to understand the nuance here
California was not able to redraw district lines without a vote
Imo if Texas approached it this way, it probably passes. Maybe not. I also think the general public is anti gerrymandering for all involved
California was not able to redraw district lines without a vote
Imo if Texas approached it this way, it probably passes. Maybe not. I also think the general public is anti gerrymandering for all involved
Popular
Back to top


20









