Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

How many people do we think are privy to what’s “in the Epstein files”?

Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109353 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:23 pm
Seems like it has to be a rather sizable number, huh?

Are they all sworn to secrecy about what they know?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463818 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:29 pm to
When Trump made Acosta resign in administration 1, wasn't there secret Congressional testimony given by Acosta? That would increase the population by a bit
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19232 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

How many people do we think are privy to what’s “in the Epstein files”?

What's actually in them? Probably less than 10.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109353 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

What's actually in them? Probably less than 10.


That would seem preposterous to me.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463818 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:33 pm to
As in too high or too low?
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12341 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:36 pm to
A lot

quote:

Teams of agents, analysts, attorneys, and privacy and civil liberties experts combed through the digital and documentary evidence with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while simultaneously protecting victims.

Justice. gov
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19232 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

That would seem preposterous to me.

Not what they are going to release but the real information.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109353 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:44 pm to
I basically got what you’re getting at and still say it’s preposterous.

Hell, the whole notion that there are folks able to distinguish and dissect the real information from what isn’t would belie the idea that there is only a tiny number of individuals actually privy to it.
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
8771 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:21 pm to
I think AI would have to be utilized to really know. The files are probably such a jumbled mess with so much minutia and irrelevant info to cull through that it’s hard to make sense of it. Maybe AI is being used to go through it, I’m not sure.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170266 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while simultaneously protecting victims.

They say this and then every few months more trickles out that doesn't harm victims

The idea that we've seen everything other than what harms the victims is being continuously proven wrong
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12341 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

The idea that we've seen everything other than what harms the victims is being continuously proven wrong


Agreed
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram