- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How many people do we think are privy to what’s “in the Epstein files”?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:23 pm
Seems like it has to be a rather sizable number, huh?
Are they all sworn to secrecy about what they know?
Are they all sworn to secrecy about what they know?
4
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:29 pm to Y.A. Tittle
When Trump made Acosta resign in administration 1, wasn't there secret Congressional testimony given by Acosta? That would increase the population by a bit
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:31 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
How many people do we think are privy to what’s “in the Epstein files”?
What's actually in them? Probably less than 10.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:33 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
What's actually in them? Probably less than 10.
That would seem preposterous to me.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:33 pm to Y.A. Tittle
As in too high or too low? 
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:36 pm to Y.A. Tittle
A lot
Justice. gov
quote:
Teams of agents, analysts, attorneys, and privacy and civil liberties experts combed through the digital and documentary evidence with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while simultaneously protecting victims.
Justice. gov
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:39 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
That would seem preposterous to me.
Not what they are going to release but the real information.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 12:44 pm to boogiewoogie1978
I basically got what you’re getting at and still say it’s preposterous.
Hell, the whole notion that there are folks able to distinguish and dissect the real information from what isn’t would belie the idea that there is only a tiny number of individuals actually privy to it.
Hell, the whole notion that there are folks able to distinguish and dissect the real information from what isn’t would belie the idea that there is only a tiny number of individuals actually privy to it.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:21 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I think AI would have to be utilized to really know. The files are probably such a jumbled mess with so much minutia and irrelevant info to cull through that it’s hard to make sense of it. Maybe AI is being used to go through it, I’m not sure.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:23 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while simultaneously protecting victims.
They say this and then every few months more trickles out that doesn't harm victims
The idea that we've seen everything other than what harms the victims is being continuously proven wrong
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:32 pm to Powerman
quote:
The idea that we've seen everything other than what harms the victims is being continuously proven wrong
Agreed
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News