Started By
Message

Deputy AG Requests Tina Peters Be Transferred to Federal Facility

Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:20 pm
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74482 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:20 pm


Fingers crossed this is the first step towards securing her freedom.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
161637 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:32 pm to
good. she needs commuted and released immediately.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463726 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Deputy AG Requests Tina Peters Be Transferred to Federal Facility


That's not what the email says

It asks the BOP "explore any and all avenues" within the BOP authority to transfer her.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463726 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:46 pm to
quote:


good. she needs commuted and released immediately.


If somehow the amin engages in chicanery to transfer her to the BOP, the President doesn't have any authority to commute a state-level sentence.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

good. she needs commuted and released immediately.

Why?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124657 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:50 pm to
Because she had two build two doors cuz of Kavanaugh.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463726 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

Because she had two build two doors cuz of Kavanaugh.


I understand the reference to CBF but now how it's relevant or applicable to Tina Peters
Posted by BarnHater
Member since May 2015
7435 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

Why?


Because she did nothing wrong. Is that so hard for you to understand?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463726 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Because she did nothing wrong.


You think fraudulently using a third party ID to access sensitive voter data and then blindly giving that data to a different third party is "nothing wrong"?

Do you think all government actors should be able to act similarly with government data? What about the people who stole Trump's tax returns and gave them to media outlets?
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 5:54 pm
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8097 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

You think fraudulently using a third party ID to access sensitive voter data and then blindly giving that data to a different third party is "nothing wrong"?



You still believe Russian Collusion and PDJT pissing on a bed with hookers.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463726 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

You still believe Russian Collusion

What? Link?

quote:

and PDJT pissing on a bed with hookers

Oh, you're retarded. I always called out that hoax.

But your example isn't even relevant b/c my factual summary isn't in dispute.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8021 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:23 pm to
Leftists like yourself really enjoy keeping political prisoners.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
7199 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:27 pm to
I think Peters was railroaded and certainly sentenced to an excessive sentence.

None of that would be the basis for a transfer to a federal facility. She was convicted of state charges.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74482 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:28 pm to
The Tina Peters situation is always a great litmus test to tell who truly drank all of the Kool-Aid surrounding the results of the 2020 election.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 6:58 pm
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
34976 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

That's not what the email says

It asks the BOP "explore any and all avenues" within the BOP authority to transfer her.

Brah.

That's literally a request.
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
3495 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

That's not what the email says It asks the BOP "explore any and all avenues" within the BOP authority to transfer her.


She should do the hardest rime possible according to the rules of the
LAW!!

Am I right or what?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39099 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

good. she needs commuted and released immediately.


Goldstar mom.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74482 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:05 pm to
Tina's situation falls into that same intellectual blind spot for some of our usual suspects as the 25th Amendment debacle for Biden:

The people who would've been the appropriate parties to take irregularity concerns to were the same people who were direct beneficiaries of the fraud that was being reported. They aren't going to narc on themselves, so they whistle past the graveyard, pretend everything is on the level and when folks continue to ask questions years later, their last line of defense is that it's been too long to do anything about it and we should all just move on as if nothing happened. The proper order of operations wasn't followed to completion and they don't know why folks won't let it go.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463726 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Brah.

That's literally a request.

No. It's asking them to find authority that may be the basis for a request in the future
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
91760 posts
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

You think fraudulently using a third party ID to access sensitive voter data and then blindly giving that data to a different third party is "nothing wrong"?


Muh intent amirite
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram