- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CO to raise state income taxes on higher-earning households to fund free meals
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:15 pm to RLDSC FAN
If the meals are free why do they need funding?
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:19 pm to RLDSC FAN
The free school meal program passed a few years ago.
They are doing this now because it cost too much and they didn’t foresee a 30% increase in meals served.
Go figure that it’s never enough.
They are doing this now because it cost too much and they didn’t foresee a 30% increase in meals served.
Go figure that it’s never enough.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:22 pm to dgnx6
quote:
They are doing this now because it cost too much and they didn’t foresee a 30% increase in meals served
LOL, this is for all the illegals that state imported.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:24 pm to RLDSC FAN
That link is crap. I don't want to go to their "live elections updates" website.
I want to know what they define as "higher-earning."
I want to know what they define as "higher-earning."
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:26 pm to imjustafatkid
Here's a better one
LINK
quote:
Prop. MM will provide an infusion of money for the program by increasing taxes paid by individuals making more than $300,000 annually. It's estimated that MM, by significantly lowering the amount those taxpayers can deduct from their income for state taxes, would raise $95 million per year for school meals.
LINK
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:28 pm to RLDSC FAN
The other prop. They passed was to let the government keep 11 million in excess taxes that were collected for the free meal program.
So keep the excess and tax me harder!
The educated people!
So keep the excess and tax me harder!
The educated people!
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:29 pm to RLDSC FAN
Why don't they just tax the legal marijuana sales since the kids who smoke probably eat more?
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:35 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
by increasing taxes paid by individuals making more than $300,000 annually.
That’s a pretty low threshold. That’s going to snare a lot of working/dual income people. $300k sounds like a lot, but most of these people have bills to pay, kids to educate and raise, etc. I’d be looking to get out of there.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:39 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
LOL, this is for all the illegals that state imported.
This is another thing. The low income immigrant kids get free meals too.
High earners move to low income tax state, and you are right back to not being able to fund it fully.
In year one they went over $51 million and in year 2 by $56 million. And they took funds from other education programs to fund it.
Your kid can’t read and do math, but they get free breakfast. That’s all that matters.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:39 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
fund free meals for all public school students

Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:40 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
$300k sounds like a lot, but most of these people have bills to pay, kids to educate and raise, etc. I’d be looking to get out of there.
If this is the number for a joint filing in Denver, that's not that hard to reach.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:41 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
So arent "free" meals
They are free to the people who eat them.
Unless you think considering saying thank you is some sort of a payment
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:42 pm to dgnx6
quote:
High earners move to low income tax state, and you are right back to not being able to fund it fully.
Wow, it's almost like funneling all the money into a few peoples hands is a bad idea.
Y'all dance all around the light but refuse to step into it.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:42 pm to Reflex
You finally were honest and answered my question that you are in fact tarding up every thread
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:43 pm to Reflex
quote:
Unless you think considering saying thank you is some sort of a payment
I would consider labeling them as "taxpayer funded" instead of "free" to at least be an acknowledgment that somebody had to pay for it.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:44 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
I would consider labeling them as "taxpayer funded" instead of "free" to at least be an acknowledgment that somebody had to pay for it.
I have no objections
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:45 pm to Reflex
quote:
Wow, it's almost like funneling all the money into a few peoples hands is a bad idea. Y'all dance all around the light but refuse to step into it.
Or keep being a retard punishing your producers.
quote:
From 2020-2023, amid remote work booms and post-pandemic shifts, the state lost ~20,000-30,000 net residents in the $200k+ income bracket, per IRS migration data and Colorado Demography Office reports.
More will leave.
And don’t forget a lot of people that moved to Colorado fled California’s high taxes.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:45 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Colorado voters vote to approve
So what’s the problem?
Their state, their prerogative. If they want to tax the rich and ruin what they’ve built out there, let them.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 11:46 pm
Popular
Back to top

17






