- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Acosta Sworn Testimony: DJT's Name Not in Any Epstein COURT Documents
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:28 am
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:28 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 10/18/25 at 6:52 am
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:30 am to cajunangelle
Trigger libs. Conspiracy theories begin. Cue lib judge for TRO for something. No justice no peace!
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:31 am to cajunangelle
I'm confused... I thought it was a given Trump hitched a ride to NYC on an Epstein plane (w/ Melania, unless I'm not recalling correctly)... didn't that put him "on a document"?
I mean, we know he isn't on some damning document... but he's at least on one or two flights, right?
I mean, we know he isn't on some damning document... but he's at least on one or two flights, right?
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:36 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:37 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:38 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:42 am to W2NOMO
Geezom Pete, I thought ya'll would be getting your coffee, still half asleep and I could post the whole thread in order. to read it myself... Good thing I don't have OCD that it MUST BE IN ORDER.
I thought it was still early 6AMish. When did it get to be nearly 8AM?
I thought it was still early 6AMish. When did it get to be nearly 8AM?
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:49 am to SallysHuman
Geezom woman lemme wake up
Not real sure yet but it seems Acosta meant in COURT CASES. Many in the Palm Beach class-- got rides on his jet early on.
The dems committee thought they had a bombshell, but they just did a TRUMP search over everything.
Overall muh epstein will never end. Why doesn't MTG release names women have of who they were with, as she promised? Then we can move on and point and laugh at Blondi's binders for eternity?
The dems committee thought they had a bombshell, but they just did a TRUMP search over everything.
Overall muh epstein will never end. Why doesn't MTG release names women have of who they were with, as she promised? Then we can move on and point and laugh at Blondi's binders for eternity?
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:51 am to cajunangelle
So why does orange say it's all a hoax? Were kids not trafficked?
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:56 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Geezom woman lemme wake up
quote:
Not real sure yet but it seems Acosta meant in COURT CASES.
Ahh... well, I'm still confused... I think I recall Trump "helped" a Palm Beach investigation at some point in the 90s...
I'll wait patiently- for you or Bondi-
I will say, that without a doubt in my mind- Trump did no wrong in the Epstein sense. He is the cleanest dude to walk about in centuries and we'd already know if there were anything damning on him.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:58 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
So why does orange say it's all a hoax?
I get you're pretending to be obtuse, but the link between he and Epstein Island and molesting little girls is what he's calling the hoax. He's already spelled that out
Posted on 10/18/25 at 6:59 am to Bunk Moreland
it has been explained ad nauseum that HOAX means the democrats want to desperately tie Trump to it. To DJT it is russia russia russia.
Elon's name was named but tards moved on. They were calling Orange man a pedo. Shall we go another 3 years repeating that tripe until it's tried to be true? Blondi was a dumbass. She thought she had scoop on her desk.
Post Taibbi's latest. Is he still talking about this? Why won't MTG release the johns as she promised?
Elon's name was named but tards moved on. They were calling Orange man a pedo. Shall we go another 3 years repeating that tripe until it's tried to be true? Blondi was a dumbass. She thought she had scoop on her desk.
Post Taibbi's latest. Is he still talking about this? Why won't MTG release the johns as she promised?
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:00 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
So why does orange say it's all a hoax? Were kids not trafficked?
I think "Orange" means the democrat spin on this is a hoax.
Which is kind of evidenced in Acosta's telling of events concerning his resignation.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:06 am to cajunangelle
I don't think Taibbi has ever written anything about Epstein. Michael Tracey is kind of annoying, but he has done some deep dives into all of the materials the last few months and debunked a lot of myths. One of the most important points he has made is some of the women changed their stories since a victims' fund became available and a cottage industry started. Their credibility is terrible, they are on the record as saying they pretty much enjoyed their time with Epstein.
I think even guys like Darryl Cooper and Mike Benz, who have made the rounds on the podcast circuit about this, don't believe Epstein was working for intel agencies. Epstein was more of a free lance guy who got a pass from the intel agencies because he financed arms deals. Was he banging and pimping teens? Yes. Was he running an international child pedo ring? Probably not.
I think even guys like Darryl Cooper and Mike Benz, who have made the rounds on the podcast circuit about this, don't believe Epstein was working for intel agencies. Epstein was more of a free lance guy who got a pass from the intel agencies because he financed arms deals. Was he banging and pimping teens? Yes. Was he running an international child pedo ring? Probably not.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:07 am to cajunangelle
So much of what the left believe just isn’t true.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:09 am to cajunangelle
The logical conclusion is, and has been for a while, that Trump is protecting a few friends in that list
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:13 am to OccamsStubble
quote:
The logical conclusion is, and has been for a while, that Trump is protecting a few friends in that list
I really don't think this is the case... at least I sincerely hope not. Something is going on behind the scenes- but I just can't bring myself to believe that Trump would protect abusers of young women.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:14 am to SallysHuman
I think you are talking about Trump helping the lawyers in the investigations for the abused girls where the lawyer stated that Trump was the only one willing to help the case move forward
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:17 am to Nosevens
quote:
I think you are talking about Trump helping the lawyers in the investigations for the abused girls where the lawyer stated that Trump was the only one willing to help the case move forward
Yep- that's what I was referencing... which is one of many reasons why I find it hard to believe Trump would be "protecting" any abusive assholes on a list much less be their "friend". Just doesn’t jive.
Posted on 10/18/25 at 7:22 am to Bunk Moreland
Then why are Republicans fighting to keep the files unreleased?
Popular
Back to top


10






