Started By
Message
locked post

Is Brad Davis really that good a recruiter?

Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:12 am
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
8999 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:12 am
Since NIL and transfer portal I don’t follow recruiting like I used to.

But many have said Davis was kept on for his recruiting.

He clearly terrible as an O line coaching. What has done recruiting wise that make people say he’s good?
Posted by Wee Ice Mon
Member since May 2014
1795 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:14 am to
Benjamin Franklin is the only recruiter that matters.

Programs need to focus on the best coaches going forward.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 8:15 am
Posted by herecomethetigers02
Member since Aug 2025
336 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Benjamin Franklin


I don't see a Benjamin Franklin on staff?

what am I missing?
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
20133 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I don't see a Benjamin Franklin on staff?

what am I missing?
Derp

Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31674 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

What has done recruiting wise that make people say he’s good?

We don't get recruits simply because we outbid everyone else. We don't have the NIL funds to outspend everyone. Relationships and recruiting still matter. On site visits still happen. Recruiting trips still happen.

Hes a very good recruiter. Look at the talent that has come in under his watch - it speaks for itself.

Now whether or not he can coach worth a flip....
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
20133 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Is Brad Davis really that good a recruiter?

It's a good question and one I've been asking myself. He's consistently landed highly rated recruits, I don't think that is even debatable, but there is a clear disconnect between the ratings of the recruits and their subsequent performance on the field.

So one (or more) of these has to be true:
1. The recruiting services are consistently whiffing on evaluating these players.
2. Davis is a terrible judge of talent.
3. These recruits are good prospects, but they're not being developed, i.e. Davis is not a good coach.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 8:27 am
Posted by lsuchip30
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2007
478 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:27 am to
When Kelly accepted the job, Davis was the guy that "held the recruiting class together" - or so we were led to believe. He was the interim coach in that bowl game and was the primary recruiter for Campbell and Jones and those two OL were the cornerstones of that first recruiting class under Kelly. That seems like the main reason that he was the only one retained. We already know that mistakes were made in not retaining others but I didn't believe at the time that retaining Davis was also a mistake. I feel differently now.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287641 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:32 am to
quote:

What has done recruiting wise that make people say he’s good?


Prob that he has landed highly regarded players over and over.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15391 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:35 am to
I mean, yeah, he helped sign Will Campbell, Emery Jones, Lance Heard(now at Tenn) & for the most recent class he just signed the #1 OL in AR, #1 OL in MS, & the #2 OL in the country Solomon Thomas - (with the help of Alex Atkins).
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 8:38 am
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15391 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:

We don't get recruits simply because we outbid everyone else. We don't have the NIL funds to outspend everyone. Relationships and recruiting still matter. On site visits still happen. Recruiting trips still happen.


It’s possible, but I doubt that we outbid A&M for Coen Echols
Posted by herecomethetigers02
Member since Aug 2025
336 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:41 am to
makes sense... I don't use cash baw
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
15714 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:47 am to
quote:


So one (or more) of these has to be true:
3. The recruiting services are evaluating players ..they are not perfect.
2. Davis is a bad judge of talent.
1. These recruits are good prospects, but they're not being developed, i.e. Davis is not a good coach


FIFY
You inadvertently had them in reverse order of team impact.

Posted by lsuchip30
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2007
478 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:48 am to
It does seem that we have consistently signed highly rated OL recruits with Davis here - going back to the last couple of years of O being the head coach. Now - how those ratings compare to the actual performance on the field of some of those recruits - there is definitely a gap there. Is that poor ratings? or is it poor evaluations? or poor coaching once they are here? Not sure, but there is some disconnect.
Posted by supersaints9
Colleyville,Tx
Member since Dec 2009
18034 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:57 am to
He’s obviously a poor hahaha
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
33075 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

country Solomon Thomas - (with the help of Alex Atkins).


He must be extremely raw. He doesn't even dress out.

I'm guessing they paid a pretty penny for Solomon Thomas.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15391 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:06 am to
quote:

He must be extremely raw. He doesn't even dress out.


he is injured. Why wouldn’t that be your initial guess?
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
16069 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:11 am to
On paper he is but it has to translate to the field. NIL money does most of the recruiting these days.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
32376 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

He clearly terrible as an O line coaching. What has done recruiting wise that make people say he’s good?


If you go back and look at what we had in the offseason before 2022 and what we have now, there’s no question that the talent level and depth are nowhere close to where they were a few years ago. We’ve pulled in 5 5* OL (Campbell, Heard, Davis, Thomas and Curne) in that time period and retained 4 of them. Retention has also been good across the backups, with only a few leaving to get playing time elsewhere and none besides Heard who were threats to get on the field.

You will always have some 3*s on the OL brought into fill out the roster based on potential, but there have been more 4 stars like Adams, Echols and Chester to fill out the ranks than developmental pieces like a Bo Bordelon under Davis. People complain that he’s not identifying the right guys, but when you have this many 4 and 5* players and multiple draft picks- draw your own conclusion there.

The issue isn’t recruiting. There are schools with less overall talent and depth playing better and more consistently right now. We have 2 experienced portal guys with proven P4 track records and 5* and 4* (who is actually playing close to that level) on this starting OL. We have 2 more 5* freshmen waiting in the wings. There are enough pieces here to build a good or better OL. ALL of the evidence points to this definitely being a coaching and system issue.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
32376 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Benjamin Franklin is the only recruiter that matters. Programs need to focus on the best coaches going forward.


Evaluation is still critical because most OL tend to be raw coming out of HS. But you are right that quality coaching should be the focus going forward. And a great technical coach should be a good evaluator, in most cases.
Posted by Vanilla Thunder
Member since Apr 2022
1145 posts
Posted on 10/8/25 at 9:27 am to
Benjamin Franklin once said that Les Miles’s offense was outdated.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram