Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

PDT Rule could be going bye bye

Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:02 am
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
49592 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:02 am

Gamestop degens get in here and let's lose some money!!

Posted by Billy Blanks
Member since Dec 2021
4970 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 6:58 am to
What's this mean?
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
45964 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:00 am to
Basically that you don't need $25k in your account to day trade. I believe the proposal is to lower it to $2k.

That should've never been a rule, IMO. If I want to be a complete regard (which I am) and lose all my money (which I do) then I should be allowed to, regardless of how much money I have in my account.

ETA -
quote:

The Pattern Day Trading (PDT) rule is a regulation established by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to manage the risks associated with frequent day trading.

Currently, the rule designates a trader as a "Pattern Day Trader" (PDT) if they execute four or more day trades within a five-business-day period using a margin account, provided these trades constitute more than 6% of their total trading activity during that window.

A day trade is defined as the purchase and sale (or short sale and repurchase) of the same security on the same trading day.

To be classified as a PDT, a trader must maintain a minimum equity of $25,000 in their margin account.
If the account equity falls below this threshold, the trader is prohibited from making further day trades until the balance is restored.

This rule applies specifically to margin accounts, which allow traders to borrow funds from their broker; cash accounts, where only the trader's own funds are used, are exempt from the PDT rule.

The primary purpose of the PDT rule is to protect inexperienced traders from the risks of excessive leverage and potential significant losses.

However, the rule is currently undergoing a significant proposed overhaul. On September 24, 2025, FINRA approved amendments to replace the $25,000 minimum equity requirement with a proposed $2,000 threshold.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 7:03 am
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
49592 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 7:13 am to
quote:

That should've never been a rule, IMO. If I want to be a complete regard (which I am) and lose all my money (which I do) then I should be allowed to

This!
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
10715 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:36 am to
They don't give a damn about the inexperienced trader. They just don't want the wall street bets crew being able to alter their control of price movements.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
4419 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 8:43 am to
I think it was a good rule for its time. But now that we’re at a point where it’s legal to outright gamble on any mundane topic or event it’s kind of hypocritical.

Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
147925 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:27 am to
If I can gamble on what inning a streaker will run out on the field at Camden Yards, I should be able to gamble on what shitcoin a bunch of autist decide to take a liking to.
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6281 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 9:45 am to
I have to wonder how this will change platforms. Will it change margin account.... etc.


Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
20101 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:21 pm to
Just let me know when to go “diamond hands” on a company with no sales, no earnings, and no dividends.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26705 posts
Posted on 9/25/25 at 11:41 pm to
Can we also get rid of t + 2
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram