Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

How can we continue to allow running backs to lower the crowns of their helmets

Posted on 9/21/25 at 3:50 pm
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
23883 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 3:50 pm
If we are going to also call the most ticky tacky tackles be ruled “targeting”

The on any football game on Saturday. Watch the running backs immediately lower their heads when trying to break a tackle… they make direct contact with the head or neck area with blatant force…. But we continue to see defenders tossed across the landscape for making tackles.
Posted by Tigerinasia
Natchitoches
Member since Jan 2008
1986 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 3:57 pm to
Or why isn’t targeting call on most tush push type sneaks? Crown collisions abound.
Posted by 62zip
One Particular Harbor
Member since Aug 2005
6852 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 9:02 pm to
A defender trying to make a tackle is not a defenseless player.
Posted by mcspufftiger7
Member since Oct 2020
2983 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:34 am to
A running back lowering his helmet into a defensive player is not a defenseless player. Running backs use the crown of their helmet as a weapon. The targeting rule for RB needs to be changed. That is just a fact. I see it every weekend.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17213 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:46 am to
Because every rule change in the last 30 years seems to be pro-offense. Playing defense is so much harder today than it was even 10 years ago.

Even more reason to love Blake Baker. Doing what he and our defense is doing in this age of football is impressive as hell.
Posted by LSUcajun77
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2008
23151 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:47 am to
Until an LSU running back gets tossed for lowering his helmet and then y’all will be melting down.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
15445 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:56 am to
I been saying this ever since the rule got introduced. It’s not consistent

All offensive players can lower their head and “target” a defensive player and it’s not a penalty.
Why?
Posted by John cocktoasten
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2018
436 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:58 am to
The ejections are the problem. Horrible
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17213 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Until an LSU running back gets tossed for lowering his helmet and then y’all will be melting down.


We do seem to have a habit of being the first to have an odd call against us.
Posted by football101
South LA
Member since Jun 2011
276 posts
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:36 am to
The NFL and NCAA have gotten the targeting rule wrong from the beginning in my opinion. The last thing I think they should look at is contact with the player's head. First thing is the form of the tackle. If he isn't leading with the crown, then you can look at if he's intentionally making contact with the player's head. Most of the time, the offensive player is bracing for impact or lowering his head to initiate contact also.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram