Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

My question on the non OPI on Clemson’s first 4th down conversion

Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:05 am
Posted by crotiger0307
Utah
Member since Jan 2018
836 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:05 am
Sure, the ball was caught behind the LOS which was the correct call.. but what about the WR taking out our CB who was running directly perpendicular to him?

With the huge emphasis on eliminating the “illegal” blindside block in football, I can’t understand how that got totally missed. And I’m not really a fan of the rule, but with how technically that game was called you would think an obvious personal foul would get flagged.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
29475 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:06 am to
The block in the back was absolutely the worst.
Posted by Big Gorilla
Bossier City
Member since Oct 2020
6216 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:08 am to
I thought the same thing. Who cares he was behind the line. It was a pf for a blind side.
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
15027 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:09 am to
Definitely was a block in the back. There were several throughout the game.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
64449 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:14 am to
The non-call on intentional grounding was more egregious. As was the blown TD call, of course.
Posted by LafTiger
Member since Dec 2008
1507 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:17 am to
Refs ignoring the intentional grounding was maybe the worst. They should have discussed it and then thrown the flag.

1. Was still in the tackle box
2. Ball didn’t get back to los


That is the one that really makes me think sports betting among officials is a thing. That call was a no brainer.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram