Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

401k allocation question

Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:55 pm
Posted by MSG
B.R.
Member since Dec 2007
11264 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:55 pm
How do some of you allocate your 401ks in regards to roths, pre and post tax? Obviously I’m not super knowledgeable about all of this. But I do pay attention and I buy and sell a few times a year.

I currently split my percentages between before tax and the Roth, and then like 2% in after tax. Any recommendations?
Posted by jsk020
Nola
Member since Jan 2013
1761 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:59 pm to
It all depends on your tax bracket. I’m 24% fed so I do all traditional even tho I’m 35
Posted by MSG
B.R.
Member since Dec 2007
11264 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:04 pm to
Yeah, I’m in the 24% as well.
Posted by reds on reds on reds
Birmingham
Member since Sep 2013
4741 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:47 pm to
I’m all post tax currently (24% with SO) but in 10 months will need to reevaluate as we will be jumping to 35% bracket.
Posted by jsk020
Nola
Member since Jan 2013
1761 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 9:26 pm to
I would do 401k until employer match in traditional, then max out Roth IRA. You get the best of both.
Posted by MSG
B.R.
Member since Dec 2007
11264 posts
Posted on 8/23/25 at 6:20 pm to
So as long as I put in at least 6%, my company puts 7%. So what you’re saying is put the other 14% I'm able to contribute into the Roth?
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
892 posts
Posted on 8/23/25 at 6:40 pm to
Consider your likely tax rates when you withdraw the money in retirement. You don't want to pay 24% + state now to avoid paying 12% then. So do some math and estimate your assets and figure out how much you need to allocate to pre-tax to fill out the lower tax brackets in retirement, then work on the Roth.

Roth is not always better.

I just fricked around and found a job after retiring four years ago. I will be using traditional 401K to lower my tax burden and Obamacare payments for the rest of this year, then doing as much Roth as I can for the next two years, then possibly deferring as much as I can for the next two years if I can avoid IIRMA by doing that, hoping I'll have good chances to do some trad IRA to Roth Conversions later, though I will do some along the way.

So you see it's really simple.....


Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
1331 posts
Posted on 8/24/25 at 9:54 am to
I currently max out my Roth 401K and contribute some to post tax which is then rolled into my Roth IRA. Not all plans allow that. I’m close to maxing out the total contribution limit from all sources, hope to be maxing it out next year.

39, plan to retire at 55. 24% bracket currently.

ETA: Just switched my contributions to before tax
This post was edited on 8/24/25 at 1:27 pm
Posted by WM88
West Monroe
Member since Aug 2004
1958 posts
Posted on 8/25/25 at 9:02 pm to
Put as much into Roth as you can afford tax wise.

I put 100% of mine into Roth 401k
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
3036 posts
Posted on 8/26/25 at 7:11 am to
So you see it's really simple.....
________

Not so fast.

I have been in a higher bracket than 12% every year since I "retired" .

You are assuming you know what the tax brackets will be many years into the future. I expect tax brackets to be less favorable in the future.

Also, you are discounting the power of compounded yields, which can be significant over many years of tax free growth in a Roth.

I agree with the other poster and would fund a Roth after taking any company match.
Posted by Larry Gooseman
Houston
Member since Mar 2014
2755 posts
Posted on 8/27/25 at 1:49 pm to
I modeled out where my traditional (70%) and Roth (30%) would be at 55 and 60 and realized we will have a lot more traditional than I would like as a percentage of total retirement savings.

All employer contributions going to traditional and 10 years maxing traditional on my side I’m converting all our contributions to Roth until I see projections that suggest otherwise.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
892 posts
Posted on 8/27/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Also, you are discounting the power of compounded yields, which can be significant over many years of tax free growth in a Roth.


That is the same for both Roth and Traditional. With traditional, you get the effects of compounding on both the amount you contribute to Roth and the amount of taxes you would have paid on that contribution if you choose to put all of it in traditional.

The future rates are just an estimate, but they will be what they are today for the foreseeable future. In the past, most tax increase proposals have sought to keep the bottom brackets nearly the same, but much like investing, past performance does not guarantee future results....

The Roth has other advantages, such as no RMD, and also will not push you into higher tax brackets if you take a large withdrawal to pay off your house or something, but in an awful lot of situations, people could be paying higher taxes now to avoid lower taxes later.

quote:

You are assuming you know what the tax brackets will be many years into the future.


It's not many years into the future for me.
Posted by RHSPort
Member since Jan 2025
3 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 12:02 am to
Your question is slightly confusing. I take it your employer allows your personal 401k contributions to be Roth or Traditional? My firm does this as well, but we cannot set our personal contributions to both Roth and Traditional at the same time (ie split the percentages) which I thought was pretty typical. It sounds like your employer allows this?

In any event, since my employer's contributions are Traditional by default, I set my personal allocations to Roth. In this way the end result is a 50/50 split between Roth and Traditional contributions. Furthermore, my employer doesn't match but instead does a flat contribution percentage regardless of what we do. Because of this, I can just up my Roth contributions if I ever wanted to even out the Roth/Traditional balance ratio and catch up with the Traditional half's better compounding performance.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
71493 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:51 am to
I put all my contributions into 401k as ROTH, the match (4%) is all pre-tax bucket. 24% tax bracket, just feel like this is still a low bracket for income level and would rather have the least amount of RMD in the future. Also max a Traditional IRA which I convert to ROTH each year.
Posted by TX_Tiger23
Seabrook, Texas
Member since Aug 2013
109 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:07 pm to
U.S. debt is over $37 trillion and growing. Hedge tax risk by having assets in pre-tax, Roth and after-tax assets.
Posted by 98eagle
Member since Sep 2020
3076 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Hedge tax risk by having assets in pre-tax, Roth and after-tax assets.
I agree with your advice to hedge, however, I would also advise everyone to immediately convert all after tax asset contribution amounts to Roth. Contact your broker to do that asap if you currently have any after tax contributions that were not already converted to Roth. That's a free conversion in a 401K. After tax contribution earnings are taxable while Roth earnings are not taxable.
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 9:43 pm
Posted by TX_Tiger23
Seabrook, Texas
Member since Aug 2013
109 posts
Posted on 9/4/25 at 6:25 am to
Definitely agree with converting after-tax bucket within a 401k. I was actually referring to a regular, taxable investment account as well as qualified accounts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram