Started By
Message

Epstein's Victims attorney speaks out about Trump .....

Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:15 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42168 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:15 pm
.... but expect no one to listen to reason.

Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
9681 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:18 pm to
Soy boi thought he was gonna have a got him moment. POS!
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35108 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:20 pm to
But bruh, he broke muh campaign promise. Literally nothing else matters.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66541 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:23 pm to
Epstein bros taking a beating
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
Foggy Bottom Law School
Member since Nov 2013
47585 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:24 pm to
James Patterson's book has been out for nine years, and this douchebag acts like he's on the cutting edge of journalism to ask about it
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17673 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

James Patterson's book has been out for nine years, and this douchebag acts like he's on the cutting edge of journalism to ask about it


This interview is from years ago, probably about the same time period.
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
8699 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 11:07 pm to
Trump's supporters know he had nothing to do with Epstein's crimes. His popularity is at an all time high. Dems had the Epstein files in their possession for four years. If there was anything damaging to Trump they would have been airing it 24- 7 over the last four years.

The majority of people do not trust the dems or the media. Their continued lies will only make their approval ratings go down further. Trump keeps winning and the economy is about to boom! The midterm elections will be a diaster for the dems. So, the good guys will have much to celebrate.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42168 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 6:47 am to
quote:

James Patterson's book has been out for nine years, and this douchebag acts like he's on the cutting edge of journalism to ask about it

Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
12572 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:17 am to
Well well well
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93674 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:22 am to
Seldom seen getting destroyed
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42642 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:22 am to
Trump answered the call, offered to openly tell them what he knew.
The information he gave checked out, per the lawyer's own words.
Lawyer corroborated that Epstein was denied access to Trump's Mar a lago property, as claimed.

There is no where for the Left to go with this other than to continue to lie and make asses of themselves.

Which is exactly what they will do.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:26 am to
This is old, I believe, and these were the cases where there wasn't any evidence of anyone other than Epstein, Maxwell, and maybe Prince Andrew being involved, so why would this guy know about anyone else (including Trump)?
This post was edited on 7/27/25 at 7:27 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Lawyer corroborated that Epstein was denied access to Trump's Mar a lago property, as claimed.

This interview is the basis for that story, actually. It's old.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42642 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:33 am to
Amazing how you only see what you want to see.

Of course it's old. Epstein died 6 yrs ago, you twat.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Amazing how you only see what you want to see.



I'm explaining to you that story literally came from this interview. Posting it 10 years later isn't evidence of the veracity of the story. It's just re-posting the same video.

And I already explained that, based on what we know clearly, this lawyer doesn't know about anyone other than Epstein, Maxwell, and maybe Prince Andrew being involved in the sex trafficking. The cases he worked on were limited to those three defendants.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
16897 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Trump's supporters know he had nothing to do with Epstein's crimes.


quote:

Dems had the Epstein files in their possession for four years


Who’s Trump protecting?
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42642 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:44 am to
This video is less than 7 old, so I don't know what you're going on about. Patterson admits he "wrote" a book. And that book was published in *April 2017

Now, did it get released the very day he finished it? Of course not, but it's clear the vid came out after he finished writing it.


What's your point? This isn't some ancient file footage, like some late 90's early 2000's snapshots of Trump and Epstein standing next to each other at some random party for maybe 30 seconds.


*Hardcover.
This post was edited on 7/27/25 at 7:49 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93674 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:45 am to
Clearly himself

Watching you cry about it all day is delicious
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466333 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:48 am to
quote:

What's your point?

I already said it. This is circular. The story originated with him and we're just replaying old videos.

His information base is limited. He doesn't know about other people because his cases only involved Epstein, Maxwell, and maybe Andrew. Whether or not Trump was involved, this lawyer wouldn't know. The cases just didn't expand beyond the three people I listed.

quote:

This isn't some ancient file footage, like some late 90's early 2000's snapshots of Trump and Epstein standing next to each other at some random party for maybe 30 seconds.

And the larger issue is that the most likely time period for Trump to have been involved in Epstein chicanery was that time period, prior to Epstein's first prosecution. As you said, this interview (and these lawsuits) have no overlap with that time period.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42642 posts
Posted on 7/27/25 at 7:52 am to
You THINK you've made some point, but you're not proving your case.

quote:

Whether or not Trump was involved, this lawyer wouldn't know. The cases just didn't expand beyond the three people I listed.


You don't know when the video was made and posted. You just keep repeating the non sequitur that "it's old". and without evidence, claiming it's about Jefferey, Ghislaine and possibly Prince Andrew. Based on...what?

Trump freely offered to talk and in the lawyers OWN words "help". And the info Trump gave did check out. That's not generally the dealings of a man who has something to hide. But I won't expect you to agree to that or anything.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram