- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Scott Bessent just summed up the migration crisis for America
Posted on 7/6/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 7/6/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:03 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
So what will the reversal of these suppressed wages have on prices?
I never thought I'd hear the GOP promote literal Democratic economic talking points ("Wall Street has done well; now it's time for Main Street to do well").
The 2 parties have abandoned capitalists and capitalism.
I never thought I'd hear the GOP promote literal Democratic economic talking points ("Wall Street has done well; now it's time for Main Street to do well").
The 2 parties have abandoned capitalists and capitalism.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
another stupid take
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:10 am to ynlvr
quote:
Why not Both?
Nobody has been able to explain how this would work.
Successful people who have money to invest having to pay more for goods (due to the inflationary pressure of higher wages) means less money will be spent elsewhere, especially in investing.
And the people who will get the bump in salary won't be making enough to have an abundance of extra money to invest. They'll still be in the lower-level earning demographics, and still struggling economically.
This means less money flowing to our more productive areas (which require the investment) and that means less economic/GDP growth.
There is a reason the "blood and soil" types peg this correctly and attack GDP/SOL (typically labeling economic success as an "economic zone") with to promote their proposed racial harmony.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
I never thought the leftist party would embrace government endorsed controlled speach, insider trading and war profiteering with no border security.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 2 parties have abandoned capitalists and capitalism.
You just prefer the side of capitalism where the levers of government advantage Wall Street. That’s okay everyone can have a preference as long as the government does not own the means of production we still have a capitalism field to play in. Sometimes Main Street is going to get the ball and score.
This post was edited on 7/6/25 at 9:13 am
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:12 am to goatmilker
quote:
I never thought the leftist party would embrace government endorsed controlled speach, insider trading and war profiteering with no border security.
Sure. The problem is there are no Democrats on here currently to address that point to
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:13 am to GumboPot
quote:
You just prefer the side of capitalism where the levers of government advantage Wall Street.
You mean "fewer levers" and more freedom. That will favor economic outlets like Wall Street more than less productive endeavors.
quote:
Sometimes Main Street is going to get the ball and score.
And this socialist-style "help" will hurt them eventually. They'll get an immediate bump in SOL and then suffer over the long-term as growth is nerfed.
This post was edited on 7/6/25 at 9:14 am
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:15 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
another stupid take
Says the guy with the most embarrassing post of the week for the board...made at 9:00am on Sunday
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Please explain how removing an artificial supply (illegal immigrants suppressing wages) is "abandoning capitalism".
I'm sure you'll include multiple qualifiers and "if/thens" to your explanation so that later when you're called out on it you can passively aggressively claim, "I never said that" like an 8th grade girl.
I'm sure you'll include multiple qualifiers and "if/thens" to your explanation so that later when you're called out on it you can passively aggressively claim, "I never said that" like an 8th grade girl.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
True. I grew up thinking I would be debating blue dog and Ivory Tower libs for the rest of my life lol.
Didn't see the rise of the Karen and angry females of colour and their takeover of the dnc.
Didn't see the rise of the Karen and angry females of colour and their takeover of the dnc.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nobody has been able to explain how this would work.
Its called the United States of America.
Capital investment, when used correctly, has never been a zero sum game as you portend.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
Wait, so you think Main Street isn’t capitalist?
Ho
Lee
Fuk
Ho
Lee
Fuk
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:23 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
VOR is melting right now after seeing that ...........once again .........debunking the verbal diarrhea that comes out his mouth here.
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
My God you’re insufferable.
Slave wages created by cheap labor have socially and economically devastated this country, particularly in rural areas. You’ll never see it, because apparently you believe Dollar Stores, vape stores and hopeless opiate addiction are cultural meccas that the rubes deserve and society should encourage.
And I can’t believe I just fed this utter troll.
Slave wages created by cheap labor have socially and economically devastated this country, particularly in rural areas. You’ll never see it, because apparently you believe Dollar Stores, vape stores and hopeless opiate addiction are cultural meccas that the rubes deserve and society should encourage.
And I can’t believe I just fed this utter troll.
This post was edited on 7/6/25 at 9:28 am
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:25 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Please explain how removing an artificial supply (illegal immigrants suppressing wages) is "abandoning capitalism".
That artificiality is a pretty modern governmental regulation, just FWIW
Also, it's the underlying rhetoric being promoted. Taking form the successful to redistribute to the less successful is a literal Democrat/Leftist bullshite talking point.
quote:
I'm sure you'll include multiple qualifiers and "if/thens" to your explanation so that later when you're called out on it you can passively aggressively claim, "I never said that" like an 8th grade girl.
What a melt to a straw man you created yourself
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:25 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
Capital investment, when used correctly, has never been a zero sum game as you portend.
What will be the effect of less capital investment?
Posted on 7/6/25 at 9:26 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Leading Economist catching up to South Park 20 years after it aired


Popular
Back to top


13









