Started By
Message
locked post

NBA players to forfeit 9% of their salaries ($480 million) after revenue shortfall

Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:52 pm
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:52 pm
Bally Sports collapse finally recognized.
quote:

The NBA just wrapped its accounting on the 2024-25 season and pegged basketball-related income (BRI) at $10.25 billion, according to someone familiar with the accounting who was granted anonymity because the details are private. It’s a key number for players, as it determines how much of their salary they get to keep from last season.

The news is not great for players, as they will forgo more than $480 million from the escrow fund set aside to make the math work in the shared-revenue system laid out in the collective bargaining agreement between players and the league.

Stephen Curry gets dinged the most as the NBA’s highest-paid last season at $55.8 million—he also made an estimated $100 million off the court. Curry will forgo $5.1 million, and other players taking big haircuts include Joel Embiid ($4.7 million), Nikola Jokic ($4.7 million), Bradley Beal ($4.6 million) and Kevin Durant ($4.5 million).

The CBA calls for players to receive 51% of BRI. The NBA withheld 10% of player salaries last season to ensure that the revenue split was achieved. Overall revenue likely came in light due to some combination of the choppy local media environment

LINK
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 3:27 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466675 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 2:59 pm to
This is the flip side to the "they make too much" argument. What NBA (and NFL, etc.) players make is a set % of total revenue. As long as the particular league is making a ton of money, the player will benefit in direct proportion.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115626 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

This is the flip side to the "they make too much" argument. What NBA (and NFL, etc.) players make is a set % of total revenue. As long as the particular league is making a ton of money, the player will benefit in direct proportion.


Nah we should just ignore that and players should get paid based on my personal feelings on the sport and in comparison to how valuable I think it is to blue collar jobs
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40594 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

I left in the haircuts typo because I found it funny


Call me a dumbass but you're going to have to explain this to me.


"Taking a haircut" is a financial slang for incurring a loss on investment.

Did they mess that up somehow?
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

players should get paid based on my personal feelings on the sport and in comparison to how valuable I think it is to blue collar jobs

the fact you are getting downvotes for this
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

"Taking a haircut" is a financial slang for incurring a loss on investment.

Did they mess that up somehow?

I assumed they just meant players taking a big cut included those players.

I've used haircut in terms of asset depreciation but never applied it to a salary.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 3:16 pm
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12001 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

As long as the particular league is making a ton of money, the player will benefit in direct proportion.


Can you explain this point to the WNBA?
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Can you explain this point to the WNBA?

it's a tough concept to explain in sandwich-making terms
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39151 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:18 pm to
When is the NBAPA going to start bitching about funding the WNBA?
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40594 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:18 pm to
quote:


I assumed they just meant players taking a big cut included those players.

I've used haircut in terms of asset depreciation but never applied it to a salary


Fair. I think you can use them term because the portion of salary set aside I assume could have went up as well as down, so that portion was basically invested in the league vs being pulled as salary.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:25 pm to
Yeah I think it can actually work in this scenario because the way their salaries arent technically set, they are an asset.

Ill remove it from OP.

I wonder if this affects players on the league minimum?

Bronny might be in trouble.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 3:28 pm
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
10663 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:27 pm to
Malik Beasley is going to have to double down.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Malik Beasley is going to have to double down.

i cant believe how much money that dude threw away.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34123 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

This is the flip side to the "they make too much" argument. What NBA (and NFL, etc.) players make is a set % of total revenue. As long as the particular league is making a ton of money, the player will benefit in direct proportion.


Right. The money is obviously being generated, so either the players or the owners are going to get it.
Posted by GCTigahs
Member since Oct 2014
2450 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:32 pm to
Can’t wait to see what Clay Travis tweets out to Mark Cuban!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466675 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Can you explain this point to the WNBA?

WNBA salaries are a joke.

Their revenue is also inflated.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
11382 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

NBA players to forfeit 9% of their salaries ($480 million) after revenue shortfall

Would eliminating the WNBA help eliminate the shortfall?
Posted by CSinLC
Member since May 2018
2085 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Can you explain this point to the WNBA?


Women don’t understand money concepts very well
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
38238 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:26 pm to
quote:


NBA players to forfeit 9% of their salaries ($480 million) after revenue shortfall



Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
8244 posts
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:26 pm to
No worries. The WNBA will loan them some money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram