- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is Ace Bailey's apex similar to our version of Brandon Ingram?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:38 am
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:38 am
It seems that way to me. Bailey screams lesser version of BI with the same issues but no guarantee he comes close to that apex.
I just don't get why we deal BI only to pick a guy who seems to project to be that guy ONLY IF he hits his apex. What am I missing with Bailey? I understand he will be cheaper, but by the time he reaches that level he won't be that much cheaper. And he'll present the same problems BI did with Zion.
I just don't get why we deal BI only to pick a guy who seems to project to be that guy ONLY IF he hits his apex. What am I missing with Bailey? I understand he will be cheaper, but by the time he reaches that level he won't be that much cheaper. And he'll present the same problems BI did with Zion.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:40 am to SlowFlowPro
We probably aren’t even getting him lol
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
The FO that traded BI isn't the same one that would draft Bailey, for starters
Posted on 6/25/25 at 10:43 am to CP3forMVP
quote:
The FO that traded BI isn't the same one that would draft Bailey, for starters
I imagine that trading BI had to get approval above Griffin, but I could be wrong. Also, didn't Griffin deal him after he was basically shadow-fired and neutered? Wasn't that the timeline?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:49 am to SlowFlowPro
Who above Griff knows anything about basketball? Gayle will let Dumars do what he wants
Posted on 6/25/25 at 11:50 am to SCLSUMuddogs
Also, we moved BI because of his price tag more than anything
Posted on 6/25/25 at 12:44 pm to FlappingPierre
quote:
BI was so over-rated.
I disagree, but let's assume it is true.
Why would we draft a guy whose best version is BI?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 12:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
Can't really compare since this is a new front office. Griffin would definitely not but he's gone.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 12:52 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
Also, we moved BI because of his price tag more than anything
Is that what you think?
BI was moved b/c he didn't want to be here anymore and asked out.
His 3/$120 extension wasn't an overpay.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 1:39 pm to TeddyPadillac
Should have dumped the fat slob bust. At least BI gave a sh-t. Pillsbury is intentionally giving us the middle finger right in our face and laughing about it all the way to the bank for his $100+ million.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 2:14 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Is that what you think?
BI was moved b/c he didn't want to be here anymore and asked out
His 3/$120 extension wasn't an overpay
He did end up settling for that, but his demands for max money from us was something we couldn’t afford and that also restricted our ability to trade him last offseason.
Regardless, BI wasn’t moved because the FO didn’t think he was a good player for the team. Which is the point the OP seemed to be trying to make
Posted on 6/25/25 at 2:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
There’s definitely some BI in Bailey’s game but I think Bailey works better off ball and is a better athlete than Ingram was. I’d say Bailey’s ceiling is closer to Paul George
Popular
Back to top

4







