- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump: “We’re not going to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons”
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:47 pm to RaoulDuke504
Am I supposed to be mad at this?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Yes because at the end of the day Iran has a right to be their own country. We gotta stop policing the world and instead try to build relationships with every country…. In my opinion.
I know Iran has been sketchy in the past but I think we can have a strong trade agreement.
I know Iran has been sketchy in the past but I think we can have a strong trade agreement.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:49 pm to The Eric
No, they aren’t allowed to have nukes.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:50 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Am I supposed to be mad at this?
No. This is the right policy.
I was waiting for the "Thugglife" sunglass meme to finish out that video.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:50 pm to The Eric
So you supported Obama’s Iran policy?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:50 pm to The Eric
quote:
I think we can have a strong trade agreement.
Their state slogan is Death to America. You might have better luck getting a trade deal with Hamas or ISIS
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:51 pm to Proximo
The problem is this is sleight of hand BS.
First, I thought Tulsi said a month or two they were nowhere near making one.
Also, DJT reversing on any enrichment is probably a nonstarter for them.
First, I thought Tulsi said a month or two they were nowhere near making one.
Also, DJT reversing on any enrichment is probably a nonstarter for them.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:51 pm to The Eric
This isn’t about the U.S. not wanting Iran to have a nuke. Everyone doesn’t want them to have a nuke.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:52 pm to RaoulDuke504
He's going to bomb the frick outta Iran. Trump aint fricking around this go round.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:53 pm to The Eric
Muslims have been invading Christian nations for 1300 years. I dont think they are interested in having peaceful, respectful relations. Either they attack us outright or they flood us with illegals and outbirth us.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:53 pm to RaoulDuke504
Sweet. Just like the game of Risk, America is so much better when they are attacking.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:54 pm to The Eric
quote:
The Eric
You're a fricking simp. The later half of our time in Iraq was fighting Shia's from Iran.
It was astounding how many Iranian nationals we engaged and neutralized inside of Iraq during deployment from early 2007 through mid 2008.
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:56 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Their state slogan is Death to America. You might have better luck getting a trade deal with Hamas or ISIS
They have relations with every western/developed country besides the US/UK/Canada. Why is that?
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:56 pm to RaoulDuke504
It’s really a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation. Preventing them from getting a nuke probably results in conflict. Don’t prevent them from getting a nuke will also probably result in conflict because they’re going to do something fricked up with it. At least the former results in less completely innocent people dying.
Iran is the biggest instigator little shite on the planet. They fund all sorts of terror cells across the Middle East (Hamas, Houthis, etc). Them having a nuke is bad news for everyone.
Iran is the biggest instigator little shite on the planet. They fund all sorts of terror cells across the Middle East (Hamas, Houthis, etc). Them having a nuke is bad news for everyone.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:58 pm to kilo
quote:
The later half of our time in Iraq was fighting Shia's from Iran.
Majority of Iraqis living in Iraq were Shiite before we ever set one foot in that country. Period.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:59 pm to RaoulDuke504
Iraq - no nukes - regime change
Syria - no nukes- regime change
Afghanistan- no nukes - regime change
Libya - no nukes - regime change
There's a perfectly logical reason for Iran wanting nukes and it's to try and make sure they aren't the next victim of America's disastrous foreign policy. You may not like them, but if you claim to be a foreign policy realist, their desire for nukes is perfectly understandable.
Syria - no nukes- regime change
Afghanistan- no nukes - regime change
Libya - no nukes - regime change
There's a perfectly logical reason for Iran wanting nukes and it's to try and make sure they aren't the next victim of America's disastrous foreign policy. You may not like them, but if you claim to be a foreign policy realist, their desire for nukes is perfectly understandable.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 8:02 pm to SCLibertarian
Look at those beautifully self-created situations.
Posted on 6/11/25 at 8:03 pm to RaoulDuke504
Will be tariff them into oblivion?
Popular
Back to top

8











