- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS refuses to hear Challenge to Maryland ban on AR-15s
Posted on 6/4/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 6/4/25 at 1:49 pm
The usual suspects, Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett side with the liberals. Kavanaugh was nonsensical. He wrote:
“This case primarily concerns Maryland’s ban on the AR–15, a semi-automatic rifle. Americans today possess an estimated 20 to 30 million AR–15s. And AR–15s are legal in 41 of the 50 States, meaning that the States such as Maryland that prohibit AR–15s are something of an outlier.
“Given that millions of Americans own AR–15s and that a significant majority of the States allow possession of those rifles, petitioners [challenging the Maryland ban] have a strong argument that AR–15s are in ‘common use’ by law-abiding citizens and therefore are protected by the Second Amendment under Heller.”
Breitbart
“This case primarily concerns Maryland’s ban on the AR–15, a semi-automatic rifle. Americans today possess an estimated 20 to 30 million AR–15s. And AR–15s are legal in 41 of the 50 States, meaning that the States such as Maryland that prohibit AR–15s are something of an outlier.
“Given that millions of Americans own AR–15s and that a significant majority of the States allow possession of those rifles, petitioners [challenging the Maryland ban] have a strong argument that AR–15s are in ‘common use’ by law-abiding citizens and therefore are protected by the Second Amendment under Heller.”
Breitbart
This post was edited on 6/4/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 6/4/25 at 1:54 pm to Adajax
quote:
SCOTUS refuses to hear Challenge to Maryland ban on AR-15s

quote:
“This case primarily concerns Maryland’s ban on the AR–15, a semi-automatic rifle. Americans today possess an estimated 20 to 30 million AR–15s. And AR–15s are legal in 41 of the 50 States, meaning that the States such as Maryland that prohibit AR–15s are something of an outlier.
“Given that millions of Americans own AR–15s and that a significant majority of the States allow possession of those rifles, petitioners [challenging the Maryland ban] have a strong argument that AR–15s are in ‘common use’ by law-abiding citizens and therefore are protected by the Second Amendment under Heller.”

Posted on 6/4/25 at 1:54 pm to Adajax
quote:
“This case primarily concerns Maryland’s ban on the AR–15, a semi-automatic rifle. Americans today possess an estimated 20 to 30 million AR–15s. And AR–15s are legal in 41 of the 50 States, meaning that the States such as Maryland that prohibit AR–15s are something of an outlier. “Given that millions of Americans own AR–15s and that a significant majority of the States allow possession of those rifles, petitioners [challenging the Maryland ban] have a strong argument that AR–15s are in ‘common use’ by law-abiding citizens and therefore are protected by the Second Amendment under Heller.”
What a cop out
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:01 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:
“Given that millions of Americans own AR–15s and that a significant majority of the States allow possession of those rifles, petitioners [challenging the Maryland ban] have a strong argument that AR–15s are in ‘common use’ by law-abiding citizens and therefore are protected by the Second Amendment under Heller.”
All snarkiness aside... what exactly is it that he's attempting to say? And, obviously, not doing a very good job of...
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:04 pm to Adajax
What the hell does that mean? It's almost as if he thinks they're legal in Maryland.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:09 pm to WeeWee
I would like to remind everyone that the Federalist Society is filled with panty-waisted nerds who cannot be trusted with the continuation of our society and judicial system.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:13 pm to Adajax
quote:
“This case primarily concerns Maryland’s ban on the AR–15, a semi-automatic rifle. Americans today possess an estimated 20 to 30 million AR–15s. And AR–15s are legal in 41 of the 50 States, meaning that the States such as Maryland that prohibit AR–15s are something of an outlier.
It almost sounds like "most everybody is OK so we aren't going to waste time with these few folks who are having their rights trampled on by the government." I hope that's not what he is saying.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:18 pm to Adajax
From what I gathered with what is happening, they are waiting on the numerous cases in the circuit courts to work their way through before taking it on and settling it. Even if this is true, it's not comforting to see the minority of conservative justices being the ones to push taking it on now.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:21 pm to Adajax
The wine mom Barrett is the most disappointing pick ever. May as well just let the dims nominate someone.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:25 pm to Buckriggler
quote:
From what I gathered with what is happening, they are waiting on the numerous cases in the circuit courts to work their way through before taking it on and settling it.
This is what I figured.... although are they not allowed to reach down and consolidate all of the cases and then take them up at once?
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:25 pm to JackieTreehorn
Other than Alito and Thomas they all suck.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:27 pm to AU86
quote:
Other than Alito and Thomas
Gorsuch is pretty solid. Crazy as it sounds, I hope Trump doesn't get to pick the next replacement
This post was edited on 6/4/25 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:27 pm to Adajax
9 states infringing on rights is an okay limit to wait for more cases
Make it make sense
Make it make sense
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:27 pm to Adajax
Kavanaugh is waiting on a different AR-15 case that is currently in a lower court. It will be before the Court, next term or the next. He knows this. It will be a better case. When it’s up, he’ll provide the 5th vote. And Roberts will vote to hear it, as well. Who knows about Barrett- probably depends on which way the wind is blowing.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:31 pm to Adajax
ALL gun laws are unconstitutional.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 2:33 pm to AU86
quote:
Other than Alito and Thomas they all suck.
Gorsuch is solid.
Posted on 6/4/25 at 4:34 pm to jbgleason
quote:
It almost sounds like "most everybody is OK so we aren't going to waste time with these few folks who are having their rights trampled on by the government." I hope that's not what he is saying.
Pretty much what he said. Pathetic.
Popular
Back to top
