- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Another kids show messing with the kids
Posted on 6/2/25 at 7:03 am
Posted on 6/2/25 at 7:03 am
LINK
Look up which shows are most popular among children these days, and you’re sure to find Netflix’s "CoComelon" at the top of the list. The animated series prides itself on teaching preschoolers basic concepts like letters, numbers, colors, shapes, and social skills through catchy nursery rhymes, original songs, and colorful 3D animation. Emphasizing positive themes such as kindness, sharing, and problem-solving, "CoComelon" seems benign, perhaps even beneficial, to parents who need a moment’s peace or a few minutes to prepare a meal.
However, a deeper dive into the making of the series reveals a sinister truth: The creators are purposely frying children’s brains.
To dive into this controversy, Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” invites Clare Morell, author and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, to the show to share her knowledge.
Morell, citing a New York Times article, says that researchers at Moonbug Entertainment, the British children’s content company behind "CoComelon," test child subjects in front of two screens. One airs an episode of "CoComelon"; the other, dubbed the “Distractatron,” runs through mundane footage — “ a mom cooking dinner, a dad vacuuming.” A team of note-taking researchers observes from a glass room.
“Any time the child looked away from "CoComelon" and found the real-life scene more interesting, the episode makers would note that down, where that time stamp was within the show, and then they'd go back and they'd add more music, brighter lights, flashing colors to that point in the show because they want it to be immersive and addictive to a child,” says Morell.
So what kind of digital content is safe for young children, then?
According to Morell, none.
“The brain is in really critical periods of development, especially in those early years, and the problem is that screens are way overstimulating for a child's developing nervous system, and studies show that handing devices to these young children robs them of their ability to develop emotional regulation,” she explains. “Instead of developing patience and self-control and frustration tolerance, they're just learning to be calmed by a screen.”
Screen time limitations, she says, unfortunately, are ineffective.
“A daily screen time limit — even if it's a short amount of time — is incredibly habit-forming,” she tells Allie. Like "CoComelon," “devices are made to be addictive to a child's brain.”
“The problem is that the screen time limits don't map on to a child's mental or emotional time that is then spent craving more and more of that device because of the dopamine in the brain,” Morrell explains. “They're going to constantly crave more, and it really disregulates their developing nervous system, and so it's really important to protect those young years.”
...
Look up which shows are most popular among children these days, and you’re sure to find Netflix’s "CoComelon" at the top of the list. The animated series prides itself on teaching preschoolers basic concepts like letters, numbers, colors, shapes, and social skills through catchy nursery rhymes, original songs, and colorful 3D animation. Emphasizing positive themes such as kindness, sharing, and problem-solving, "CoComelon" seems benign, perhaps even beneficial, to parents who need a moment’s peace or a few minutes to prepare a meal.
However, a deeper dive into the making of the series reveals a sinister truth: The creators are purposely frying children’s brains.
To dive into this controversy, Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” invites Clare Morell, author and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, to the show to share her knowledge.
Morell, citing a New York Times article, says that researchers at Moonbug Entertainment, the British children’s content company behind "CoComelon," test child subjects in front of two screens. One airs an episode of "CoComelon"; the other, dubbed the “Distractatron,” runs through mundane footage — “ a mom cooking dinner, a dad vacuuming.” A team of note-taking researchers observes from a glass room.
“Any time the child looked away from "CoComelon" and found the real-life scene more interesting, the episode makers would note that down, where that time stamp was within the show, and then they'd go back and they'd add more music, brighter lights, flashing colors to that point in the show because they want it to be immersive and addictive to a child,” says Morell.
So what kind of digital content is safe for young children, then?
According to Morell, none.
“The brain is in really critical periods of development, especially in those early years, and the problem is that screens are way overstimulating for a child's developing nervous system, and studies show that handing devices to these young children robs them of their ability to develop emotional regulation,” she explains. “Instead of developing patience and self-control and frustration tolerance, they're just learning to be calmed by a screen.”
Screen time limitations, she says, unfortunately, are ineffective.
“A daily screen time limit — even if it's a short amount of time — is incredibly habit-forming,” she tells Allie. Like "CoComelon," “devices are made to be addictive to a child's brain.”
“The problem is that the screen time limits don't map on to a child's mental or emotional time that is then spent craving more and more of that device because of the dopamine in the brain,” Morrell explains. “They're going to constantly crave more, and it really disregulates their developing nervous system, and so it's really important to protect those young years.”
...
Posted on 6/2/25 at 8:44 am to Night Vision
Intuitively, parents should recognize that show as kiddie crack.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:02 am to Night Vision
There is a long list of shows kids shouldn’t watch cocomelon is on it, peppa the pig is rude and has no consequences. She is also very mean to her dad. We do helper cars, Leo the truck and Mickey Mouse club house. Bluey is good too. We limit screen time to about an hour a day but we aren’t perfect. Old school Sesame Street is on HBO and so is Mr Rodgers.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:05 am to McLemore
quote:
Intuitively, parents should recognize that show as kiddie crack.
They are all like that. Bright, vivid colors flashing across the screen. Even PBS kids shows are like that - Daniel Tiger is super crack for kids.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:07 am to Night Vision
quote:
So what kind of digital content is safe for young children, then?
None.
I grew up without being glued to a TV. When I did get to watch TV, I found "Mr. Rogers Neighborhood" and "Nature" to be more entertaining and fascinating than cartoons.
TV is a babysitter now, and that's a problem when globohomo has taken over production of kids' TV. I don't understand why parents who grew up without all these flash-dashy distraction shows, think it's ok for their kids to be raised by the shows. When our kids were growing up they'd rather have been outside playing, fishing or hunting than watching TV or playing Xbox.
As an aside, I almost hate you for mentioning cocomelon. Back when Mrs. Axe left her job for a while and was babysitting our nephew, I saw every episode at least 20× over. If I ever have to hear a song about making rainbow popsicles again, I'll pull my own hair out.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:14 am to Night Vision
If we'd had kids, our plan was always to load up on cartoons from the 70s & 80s and avoid all of the modern nonsense from the jump.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:51 am to Night Vision
Isn't this their job? While I am surprised to read about the techniques used, it does not shock me that they have some sort of internal study done to try to get kids locked in on their show. I always assumed all of these cartoon shows were structured in a way to get the kids to become addicted. The more addicted they are, the more they request the show, and the more likely they will want to buy the toys, clothes, stuffies...
Back to top

5








