- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Crime-fighting hero who was the worst at actually fighting crime
Posted on 5/26/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 1:49 pm
I like it when our new tech overlords validate one of my working theories. Very endearing and makes me realize that AI isn't t all bad after all. ...You can tell from watching one episode that Hong Kong Phooey smoked himself half-retired while his brain was still developing as a teengager and became a completely useless adult. Hong Kong Phooey was a straight dumbass!!!
Was Hong Kong Fooie the worst crime figthing hero at actually fighting crime?
ChatGPT said:
Hong Kong Phooey might just be one of the least effective crime-fighting heroes ever — and that was entirely the point.
Here's why he's arguably the worst at actually fighting crime:
Completely Incompetent: Hong Kong Phooey (mild-mannered janitor Penrod "Penry" Pooch by day) had no actual martial arts skills. He bungled nearly every crime-fighting attempt.
Relied on Luck (or Spot): Most of the crimes were actually solved either by dumb luck or with major help from his loyal cat sidekick, Spot — who got zero credit.
Caused More Problems Than He Solved: In many episodes, Hong Kong Phooey’s efforts caused chaos or made situations worse before they got better.
Delusional Confidence: He thought he was a master of kung fu, quoting from his "Hong Kong Book of Kung Fu," which he misused constantly. The contrast between his confidence and his actual skill level was part of the gag.
BUT — was he really the worst?
If you compare him to other deliberately inept heroes like:
Inspector Clouseau (Pink Panther)
The Tick
Johnny English
…he’s in good company. They're all satire — designed to poke fun at hero tropes.
So yes, he’s probably one of the worst at actually fighting crime, but that’s what makes him lovable and hilarious. Spot was the real MVP.
Want a list of other hilariously bad "heroes"?
You said:
Could you rank your top 5 worst?
ChatGPT said:
Absolutely! Here's a fun Top 5 Worst Crime-Fighting "Heroes" — ranked by how bad they actually are at solving crime (whether by incompetence, cluelessness, or sheer chaos).
?? 1. Hong Kong Phooey
Show: Hong Kong Phooey (1974)
Why: Literally never solves crimes on his own. Completely inept at kung fu, relies entirely on his cat Spot, and bumbles his way through every case.
Catchphrase vs. Reality: "Number one super guy" — but only if you're counting from the bottom.
?? 2. Inspector Clouseau
Movie Series: The Pink Panther
Why: A disaster in a trench coat. Clumsy, oblivious, and causes more accidents than crimes he solves. Somehow always wins through pure luck.
Legacy: Arguably the original blueprint for lovable incompetence.
?? 3. Johnny English
Movie Series: Johnny English (2003–2018)
Why: Think James Bond with a head injury. Lacks basic spy skills, misunderstands everything, and constantly puts others in danger — yet saves the day by accident.
Bonus: He’s so confident it hurts.
?? 4. Frank Drebin
Show/Movie: Police Squad! / The Naked Gun
Why: He means well, but he’s a trainwreck of slapstick disasters. Solves crimes through slapstick and miscommunication, not detective work.
Quote: “Nothing to see here!” as things explode behind him.
?? 5. The Tick
Show(s): The Tick (animated & live-action)
Why: A big-hearted, super-strong blue goofball with no real clue how the world works. He yells dramatic things and punches stuff — that's it.
Effectiveness: Zero strategy, no brains — just brute force and luck.
Honorable Mentions:
Inspector Gadget – Has gadgets galore but zero competence. His niece Penny and dog Brain do all the work.
Chief Wiggum (The Simpsons) – A cop so bad it's surprising Springfield hasn't fallen into chaos.
Danger Mouse (parody) – He's more aware than most here, but still in the “accidental hero” tier.
Want me to rank the best crime-fighters next for contrast

Was Hong Kong Fooie the worst crime figthing hero at actually fighting crime?
ChatGPT said:
Hong Kong Phooey might just be one of the least effective crime-fighting heroes ever — and that was entirely the point.
Here's why he's arguably the worst at actually fighting crime:
Completely Incompetent: Hong Kong Phooey (mild-mannered janitor Penrod "Penry" Pooch by day) had no actual martial arts skills. He bungled nearly every crime-fighting attempt.
Relied on Luck (or Spot): Most of the crimes were actually solved either by dumb luck or with major help from his loyal cat sidekick, Spot — who got zero credit.
Caused More Problems Than He Solved: In many episodes, Hong Kong Phooey’s efforts caused chaos or made situations worse before they got better.
Delusional Confidence: He thought he was a master of kung fu, quoting from his "Hong Kong Book of Kung Fu," which he misused constantly. The contrast between his confidence and his actual skill level was part of the gag.
BUT — was he really the worst?
If you compare him to other deliberately inept heroes like:
Inspector Clouseau (Pink Panther)
The Tick
Johnny English
…he’s in good company. They're all satire — designed to poke fun at hero tropes.
So yes, he’s probably one of the worst at actually fighting crime, but that’s what makes him lovable and hilarious. Spot was the real MVP.
Want a list of other hilariously bad "heroes"?
You said:
Could you rank your top 5 worst?
ChatGPT said:
Absolutely! Here's a fun Top 5 Worst Crime-Fighting "Heroes" — ranked by how bad they actually are at solving crime (whether by incompetence, cluelessness, or sheer chaos).
?? 1. Hong Kong Phooey
Show: Hong Kong Phooey (1974)
Why: Literally never solves crimes on his own. Completely inept at kung fu, relies entirely on his cat Spot, and bumbles his way through every case.
Catchphrase vs. Reality: "Number one super guy" — but only if you're counting from the bottom.
?? 2. Inspector Clouseau
Movie Series: The Pink Panther
Why: A disaster in a trench coat. Clumsy, oblivious, and causes more accidents than crimes he solves. Somehow always wins through pure luck.
Legacy: Arguably the original blueprint for lovable incompetence.
?? 3. Johnny English
Movie Series: Johnny English (2003–2018)
Why: Think James Bond with a head injury. Lacks basic spy skills, misunderstands everything, and constantly puts others in danger — yet saves the day by accident.
Bonus: He’s so confident it hurts.
?? 4. Frank Drebin
Show/Movie: Police Squad! / The Naked Gun
Why: He means well, but he’s a trainwreck of slapstick disasters. Solves crimes through slapstick and miscommunication, not detective work.
Quote: “Nothing to see here!” as things explode behind him.
?? 5. The Tick
Show(s): The Tick (animated & live-action)
Why: A big-hearted, super-strong blue goofball with no real clue how the world works. He yells dramatic things and punches stuff — that's it.
Effectiveness: Zero strategy, no brains — just brute force and luck.
Honorable Mentions:
Inspector Gadget – Has gadgets galore but zero competence. His niece Penny and dog Brain do all the work.
Chief Wiggum (The Simpsons) – A cop so bad it's surprising Springfield hasn't fallen into chaos.
Danger Mouse (parody) – He's more aware than most here, but still in the “accidental hero” tier.
Want me to rank the best crime-fighters next for contrast
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 1:53 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
I always wondered why He-Man never killed Skeletor.
And in G.I. Joe…. All those bullets flying around and not one fatality….
And in G.I. Joe…. All those bullets flying around and not one fatality….
Posted on 5/26/25 at 1:55 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
Dont mess w Hong Kong!
He was faster than the human eye- so you missed a lot- AI obviously did too.
He was faster than the human eye- so you missed a lot- AI obviously did too.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 1:56 pm to JEC119
And in G.I. Joe…. All those bullets flying around and not one fatality…
Just like the A-team... (were they one in the same?!)
Just like the A-team... (were they one in the same?!)
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:29 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:
Frank Drebin
He killed 1000 drug dealers
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:30 pm to PaulMainieriEmbolism
Where do you think El Kabong would fall in this spectrum?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:31 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
So this is what the OT has come to
AI slop posting from some gay bot
AI slop posting from some gay bot
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:39 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
Y’all still watch cartoons?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:41 pm to JEC119
quote:
And in G.I. Joe…. All those bullets flying around and not one fatality….
I used to like Cobra because they had cooler equipment.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 6:41 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy
Posted on 5/27/25 at 6:45 am to Bigfishchoupique
quote:
Y’all still watch cartoons?
They still watch FAKE professional wrestling.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 7:10 am to Violent Hip Swivel
Hey, now. The Tick got things done ultimately.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 7:10 am to Violent Hip Swivel
From what I remember, inspector gadget wasn’t all that good at his job either.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:40 pm to OweO
quote:
I used to like Cobra because they had cooler equipment.
My favorite toy was cobras flight pod.

But nothing would come close to the aircraft carrier toy…. Which I never got … damn it!

Posted on 5/27/25 at 12:53 pm to JEC119
That thing cost $100 and my parents refused to buy me one.
I wanted it so bad for, I don't know how many Christmas' in a row, and it cost $100.. And my momma would always tell me she wasn't spending $100 on something I would play with for a little while then get bored with it. She was probably right which is why I would get 2 or 3 action figures, a lego set, some board game and something I wanted specifically.. Chemistry set, a remote control car, etc.
It was pretty irresponsible to sell those chemistry sets for kids. They had shite in there you were not supposed to mix together, but I would take it outside and mix shite until it started smoking then pour it on ants.

I wanted it so bad for, I don't know how many Christmas' in a row, and it cost $100.. And my momma would always tell me she wasn't spending $100 on something I would play with for a little while then get bored with it. She was probably right which is why I would get 2 or 3 action figures, a lego set, some board game and something I wanted specifically.. Chemistry set, a remote control car, etc.
It was pretty irresponsible to sell those chemistry sets for kids. They had shite in there you were not supposed to mix together, but I would take it outside and mix shite until it started smoking then pour it on ants.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 1:13 pm to OweO
quote:
They had shite in there you were not supposed to mix together, but I would take it outside and mix shite until it started smoking then pour it on ants.
Lmao my friends and me would do the same thing.
Popular
Back to top
