- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How Dangerous is Russia’s New Nuclear-Tipped Air-to-Air Missile?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 7:56 pm
"The Russian Aerospace Forces have begun to introduce the service’s first class of nuclear-tipped air-to-air missile into service, according to a report by the U.S. Armed Forces Defence Intelligence Agency. While little remains known regarding the missile class, it is widely expected to be a new variant of the R-37M - a missile class that was first introduced in the mid-2010s. The R-37M carries a very large 60 kilogram warhead, around three times the size of those usually integrated onto air-to-air missiles, which provides a greater capacity to integrate a miniaturised nuclear warhead. If fired from high altitudes and at high speeds by MiG-31BM interceptors, the missile can engage targets up to 400 kilometres away. The R-37M is the world’s fastest known air-to-air missile class with a Mach 6 speed, and has the second longest range int he world surpassed only by that of the Chinese PL-XX. It is manoeuvrable enough to be able to neutralise small fighter sized aircraft. The integration of nuclear warheads onto the R-37M would allow a single Russian fighter or interceptor to neutralise full squadrons of enemy targets, entire salvoes of cruise missiles, or large swarms of drones, with each MiG-31BM interceptor or Su-35 fighter able to carry four missiles.
The fielding of nuclear-tipped air-to-air missiles follows a broader trend in the Russian Armed Forces towards using nuclear assets to asymmetrically counter the much larger forces of the country’s NATO adversaries. A nuclear armed variant of the R-37M could be particularly useful against stealth aircraft such as the F-35, which has been deployed in very significant and growing numbers across the country’s European, Arctic and Far Eastern borders by Western Bloc and allied states. Although Russian radars may struggle to form a target lock on the F-35 from longer ranges sufficient to hit such a fighter at very long ranges, the fielding of a nuclear-tipped air-to-air missile reduces the need for accuracy, with the wide blast radius and wider electromagnetic pulse potentially being highly effective against such targets. The R-37M has been combat tested extensively in Ukraine, and been evaluated highly positively in both Russian and Western assessments. The missile is primarily deployed by MiG-31BM interceptors, which have by far the highest cruising speeds of any combat jet in the world and carry far larger and more powerful sensor suites than other Russian combat aircraft."
LINK
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:19 pm to John Barron
Meh... whatever Russia or China has, we have also.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:21 pm to John Barron
Now we know why Golden Dome is being built I guess.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:23 pm to John Barron
Oh no. Nukes. Gee never saw that coming lol
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:24 pm to John Barron
Not a surprise but China John says China and Russia are very dangerous.
In all seriousness, we have some stuff in our arsenal that is 50 years beyond this.
In all seriousness, we have some stuff in our arsenal that is 50 years beyond this.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:27 pm to John Barron
We clearly need to spend a few hundred billion a year more on defense. The hundreds of billions more per year we spend than China and Russia combined just isn't cutting it.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:29 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:
Now we know why Golden Dome is being built I guess
Nah. After doing more research this seems to be aimed at taking out entire squadrons of aircraft with a low yield nuclear explosion at high altitude.
Key Features of the Nuclear-Tipped R-37M
Range and Speed:
The R-37M has a reported range of 300–400 km (186–248 miles) with a jettisonable rocket booster, making it one of the longest-range air-to-air missiles in service globally.
It achieves hypersonic speeds (up to Mach 6), reducing the time adversaries have to react or evade.
This allows Russian aircraft, such as the MiG-31BM, Su-35S, and potentially Su-57, to engage targets like AWACS, tankers, or fighters from standoff distances, remaining outside the range of most enemy air-to-air missiles.
Nuclear Warhead:
Unlike its conventional high-explosive fragmentation warhead (60 kg), the nuclear variant likely carries a low-yield warhead, estimated at 1–5 kilotons based on historical precedents like the U.S. AIM-26A.
A nuclear warhead enables area-effect engagements, capable of neutralizing multiple targets within a blast radius, such as bomber formations, AWACS, or drone swarms, even with a near miss.
Guidance and Platforms:
The missile uses a combination of inertial navigation, mid-course updates, and active radar homing (Agat 9B-1388 or 9B-1103M-350), allowing “fire-and-forget” capability.
It is deployed from advanced platforms like the MiG-31BM (with Zaslon-AM radar), Su-35S (with Irbis-E radar), and potentially the Su-57, enhancing its ability to detect and engage targets at extreme ranges.
Operational Use:
The conventional R-37M has been used extensively in Ukraine since 2022, fired from MiG-31BM and Su-35S to target Ukrainian aircraft at long ranges, often forcing pilots to abandon missions or fly at low altitudes, exposing them to other threats.
Its long range and high speed make it difficult to evade, with Ukrainian pilots describing it as “fricking scary” due to its ability to be launched from Russian airspace.
Threat to High-Value Assets:
The R-37M’s primary design targets AWACS, tankers, and C4ISTAR aircraft, which are critical for NATO and Western air operations. A nuclear variant could destroy these assets and their escorts in a single strike, disrupting command, control, and situational awareness.
Its range allows Russian aircraft to engage from safe distances, potentially over their own territory or under air defense protection, reducing the risk of counterattacks.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:32 pm to John Barron
Wait until the Ghost of Ukraine shows up.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:40 pm to John Barron
MIC is licking their chops and rubbing their hands together. Military contracts are a money-making machine.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:05 pm to John Barron
The doomsday movie Fail Safe, released in 1964, the Russians had a nuclear tipped missile used to try and knock down our B-52 bombers which were flying to Moscow to drop their nuclear bombs.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:10 pm to John Barron
If anyone were to respond, would you use ChatGPT to respond like you always do?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:11 pm to John Barron
quote:
Key Features of the Nuclear-Tipped R-37M Range and Speed: The R-37M has a reported range of 300–400 km (186–248 miles) with a jettisonable rocket booster, making it one of the longest-range air-to-air missiles in service globally. It achieves hypersonic speeds (up to Mach 6), reducing the time adversaries have to react or evade. This allows Russian aircraft, such as the MiG-31BM, Su-35S, and potentially Su-57, to engage targets like AWACS, tankers, or fighters from standoff distances, remaining outside the range of most enemy air-to-air missiles. Nuclear Warhead: Unlike its conventional high-explosive fragmentation warhead (60 kg), the nuclear variant likely carries a low-yield warhead, estimated at 1–5 kilotons based on historical precedents like the U.S. AIM-26A. A nuclear warhead enables area-effect engagements, capable of neutralizing multiple targets within a blast radius, such as bomber formations, AWACS, or drone swarms, even with a near miss. Guidance and Platforms: The missile uses a combination of inertial navigation, mid-course updates, and active radar homing (Agat 9B-1388 or 9B-1103M-350), allowing “fire-and-forget” capability. It is deployed from advanced platforms like the MiG-31BM (with Zaslon-AM radar), Su-35S (with Irbis-E radar), and potentially the Su-57, enhancing its ability to detect and engage targets at extreme ranges. Operational Use: The conventional R-37M has been used extensively in Ukraine since 2022, fired from MiG-31BM and Su-35S to target Ukrainian aircraft at long ranges, often forcing pilots to abandon missions or fly at low altitudes, exposing them to other threats. Its long range and high speed make it difficult to evade, with Ukrainian pilots describing it as “fricking scary” due to its ability to be launched from Russian airspace. Threat to High-Value Assets: The R-37M’s primary design targets AWACS, tankers, and C4ISTAR aircraft, which are critical for NATO and Western air operations. A nuclear variant could destroy these assets and their escorts in a single strike, disrupting command, control, and situational awareness. Its range allows Russian aircraft to engage from safe distances, potentially over their own territory or under air defense protection, reducing the risk of counterattacks.
Answer to my question in my previous post is YES
Another ChatGPT response from JohnBarron

Have you ever had an original thought? No one cares what a computer program thinks.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:12 pm to John Barron
Air to air so just a different boom than a less expensive air to air missile
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:15 pm to John Barron
Russia doesn’t view nukes with the same level of caution as do most. China is probably as bad or worse.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:29 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Russia doesn’t view nukes
According to Grok, The fallout risk with these air to air missiles is minimal. They are intended to take out alot of jets at a high altitude with 1 missile.
Challenges for Adversaries:
The missile’s hypersonic speed and long range make it nearly impossible to evade without advanced countermeasures or long-range missiles like the AIM-120 AMRAAM or Meteor, which Ukraine currently lacks in sufficient quantity.
Ukrainian pilots have noted that only F-16s with AIM-120 AMRAAMs could partially counter the R-37M by pushing back its effective range, but early F-16 models with AN/APG-66 radars are still outclassed by Russian radars like the Irbis-E.
NATO forces, with more advanced aircraft and missiles, would still face challenges due to the R-37M’s ability to target critical support aircraft from beyond visual range
Key Factors Influencing Fallout Risk
Warhead Yield:
The R-37M’s nuclear warhead is likely low-yield, estimated at 1–5 kilotons (based on historical analogs like the U.S. AIM-26A). This is much smaller than strategic nuclear weapons (100s of kilotons to megatons).
A low-yield warhead produces less radioactive material than larger weapons, but fallout is still a concern, especially if detonated at lower altitudes.
Detonation Altitude:
Air-to-air missiles like the R-37M are designed to engage targets at high altitudes (e.g., 10,000–30,000 meters for AWACS or fighters). High-altitude airbursts typically produce minimal fallout because radioactive particles are dispersed into the upper atmosphere and decay over time, often falling far from the detonation site.
If detonated at lower altitudes (e.g., below 3,000 meters), fallout could be more localized, with radioactive particles settling over a smaller area, potentially contaminating ground or water surfaces.
Type of Fallout:
Local Fallout: Occurs with low-altitude or ground-proximate detonations, where heavier radioactive particles (e.g., fission products like cesium-137 or strontium-90) fall within hours, contaminating a limited area. For a 1–5 kt warhead, this could affect a radius of a few kilometers, depending on wind and weather.
Global Fallout: High-altitude detonations disperse lighter particles into the stratosphere, leading to delayed, diffuse fallout over weeks or months across a broader region. This was common with Cold War high-altitude tests but is less immediately hazardous.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:50 pm to John Barron
Look up the AIR-2 Genie.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:14 pm to John Barron
It’s a super bad idea to start tossing around nukes, even the “low yield” variety, as if they were standard ordinance.
And Grok can take those results and stick it. Some AI search compiler doesn’t have to live with the consequences.
And Grok can take those results and stick it. Some AI search compiler doesn’t have to live with the consequences.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:25 pm to John Barron
God dam every day with your idiotic military sky is falling shite.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:29 pm to John Barron
Bro not a chance, this is russia beating their drums. There's no fricking way it has anywhere close the range reported and there's no fricking way there's a nuclear warhead attached to it.
Russia is full of shite
Russia is full of shite
Popular
Back to top
