- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and fisheries
Posted on 5/21/25 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 5/21/25 at 7:29 pm
Would it be a stretch to say that most of their biologists are democrats?
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 5/21/25 at 7:35 pm to RedHog260
Man I dunno but after a meeting at quail drive with one of them it makes sense.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 8:51 pm to RedHog260
I’d say most I’ve met are good ol baws that like to hunt and fish
The ex secretary Montoucet just got indicted on some charges
The ex secretary Montoucet just got indicted on some charges
Posted on 5/22/25 at 5:52 am to RedHog260
Watching the la game warden ‘cops’ show, they really come off as pompous assholes.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 6:53 am to Ron Cheramie
I’d assume they’d have a deep passion for the outdoors being they work in it everyday.
I always wanted to be a game warden as a kid but I can’t handle tragic accidents and/or death.
I always wanted to be a game warden as a kid but I can’t handle tragic accidents and/or death.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 6:59 am to RedHog260
I know a couple and they're all good ole boys.
Saying that you won't improve buck genetics in a wild herd by shooting spikes will get you labelled as a democrat on the LA deer hunting FB page so if that's the standard then yeah they're democrats.
Saying that you won't improve buck genetics in a wild herd by shooting spikes will get you labelled as a democrat on the LA deer hunting FB page so if that's the standard then yeah they're democrats.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:42 am to RedHog260
My two boys are forestry majors at State and they both b!tch about how biology majors are all sorry arse hippies
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:10 am to RedHog260
A good friend was a biologist for LDWF and is definitely not a dem.
He told me about the two people who stole all the gear LDWF got with BP funds.
He told me about the two people who stole all the gear LDWF got with BP funds.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:10 am to Loup
Who the heck believes shooting spikes will make the land have better genetics?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:39 am to WillFerrellisking
quote:
Who the heck believes shooting spikes will make the land have better genetics?
The same people who have seen black panthers. So about 50% of Louisiana hunters
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:54 am to WillFerrellisking
quote:
Who the heck believes shooting spikes will make the land have better genetics?

Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:45 am to White Bear
quote:
Why do you ask?
Well it seems to me the 7 over 12" rule on Crappie at Lake D'Arbonne is nuts. You have to work at catching fish under 12". We all know the democrats hate it that we might actually feed ourselves.
[url=LINK ]
[/url]Posted on 5/22/25 at 12:21 pm to RedHog260
Can't speak for LA, but in GA I definitely get that feeling.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 12:34 pm to RedHog260
quote:
Well it seems to me the 7 over 12" rule on Crappie at Lake D'Arbonne is nuts. You have to work at catching fish under 12". We all know the democrats hate it that we might actually feed ourselves.
The biologists have very little pull within the department. Regulations are decided upon by the Commission that is made up of non-biologists. The biologists can give their research and opinions but ultimately it’s up to the Commission. So when 100 people gripe and complain that Darbonne could be Grenada lake the commission cavea to the loudest voices even though their biologists have stated the population is great up there
Posted on 5/22/25 at 1:06 pm to Ron Cheramie
quote:
The biologists have very little pull within the department. Regulations are decided upon by the Commission that is made up of non-biologists. The biologists can give their research and opinions but ultimately it’s up to the Commission. So when 100 people gripe and complain that Darbonne could be Grenada lake the commission cavea to the loudest voices even though their biologists have stated the population is great up there
Well why would the commission not listen to reason? That sounds like democrats to me.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 1:51 pm to RedHog260
Thanks. I was guessing your question was due to the newly-expanded emergency CWD crisis zone.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 1:56 pm to RedHog260
quote:
Well why would the commission not listen to reason? That sounds like democrats to me.
Commission \= biologist
Commissioners in the last have been oyster baws, Miami Corp folk, and various other shall we say special interest groups
Posted on 5/22/25 at 2:04 pm to RedHog260
This is a difficult one. Unfortunately, in many circles (maybe this one) anything other than full-on “anything goes,” no limits, rape the land, gets labeled democrat-speak.
Conservation gets labeled liberalism, although hunters/sportsmen ARE conservationists.
Conservation gets labeled liberalism, although hunters/sportsmen ARE conservationists.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 2:13 pm
Popular
Back to top

10





