Started By
Message

National Review: Barrett is a conservative justice

Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:12 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
54943 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:12 pm
Marc Wheat wrote in NR:

Justice Barrett’s populist critics implicitly argue for a “conservative” form of living constitutionalism. Yet the Constitution is inherently conservative, which is why Justice Barrett has been part of the conservative majority in decisions overturning Roe v. Wade, diminishing the unconstitutional powers of the unelected federal bureaucracy, striking down racially discriminatory affirmative action policies in public universities, striking down religious discrimination in school choice policies, upholding presidential immunity from certain prosecutions, and ensuring that President Trump was not removed from ballots during the 2024 election.

In an April 9 memorandum, President Trump directed administrative agencies to find and repeal regulations inconsistent with ten recent Supreme Court cases. Justice Barrett was on the Court for nine of those cases and ruled with the conservative majority in eight of them, diverging from her conservative colleagues only on a question of timing, not on the merits of the case itself. Thus, even if judged purely on outcome, Justice Barrett has been consistently conservative.

According to former Scalia clerk Ed Whelan, the justice liked to quote Thomas More as portrayed in A Man for All Seasons: “And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat. . . . Yes, I’d give the Devil the benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake.” Whelan’s fellow former Scalia clerk, Amy Coney Barrett, whom the president has described as a “very good woman” who is “very smart,” does her best to follow the law, and in doing so has repeatedly helped deliver legal wins for conservatives. The criticisms levied by her detractors demonstrate that they are populists, unmoored from conservatism.

Justice Barrett follows the law because she is a conservative. The liberty of every American is safer for her fidelity.

National Review
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
12077 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:20 pm to
She is a brain power nobody denies this and has held a life in politics on the judicial side conveying such mannerisms.

When a person of this stature is slated they have spent years if not decades hiding true intentions.

She wasn’t hired to work a cash register…

Our legal scholarship who vetted her honestly can’t really dig into her mind more than me or you?


Lawyers by nature are liberal manifestations.

The brilliant ones wear a mask of undefined source.

This one sucks for constitutionalists.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
54943 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:23 pm to
Most of the cases she has ruled on that have made y'all so mad, she was focusing more on process and not the actual merits of the case because the merits were not up for review.

Judges have different opinions about TRO's. Not so much a liberal conservative thing as just a different philosophy about how to handle procedural stuff.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120533 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:27 pm to
Marc Wheat is counsel to Advancing American Freedom, founded by Mike Pence.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
17011 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:32 pm to
That’s more of a self own by NR with regard to who they are when the chips are down than a coherent defense of ACB as a “conservative”.

Whats become clear is that to the establishment “conservative” doesn’t mean what we think it means much like “democracy” to a Democrat just means the system by which they maintain perpetual control of the government.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
54943 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 6:47 pm to
Yet you don't cite any decisions to support your claim.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
17011 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Yet you don't cite any decisions to support your claim.

I didn’t write an article defending her.

All if have to do to indict her as a conservative is to show her voting record as of late.

She started to the right of Roberts and Kavanaugh, but the recent rulings have her sliding almost to the exact centrist judicial position.

Interestingly she’s extremely conservative in a few areas, but seems to swing moderate on a number of others which I believe is part of what drives the wildly different perspectives on her.
Axios: USSC By Rating

Axios: 2023 Supreme Court Justices by Ruling

Empirical SCOTUS: ranking the new justices
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
47311 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:17 pm to
NR is correct. The criticism of ACB is that she is not a partisan, not that she is not a conservative.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
47311 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

That’s more of a self own by NR with regard to who they are when the chips are down than a coherent defense of ACB as a “conservative”.

You’re right. NR reveals itself as Conservative, not as Populist.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
17011 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

You’re right. NR reveals itself as Conservative, not as Populist.

I just posted multiple links showing exactly how “conservative” she is based on her actual rulings.

Spoiler Alert: outside of two specific areas she isn’t and is progressively sliding left whether due to the types of cases she’s ruling on or because of an overall realignment.
Posted by Lutcher Lad
South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Member since Sep 2009
6741 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:35 am to
She ain't what we thought she would be...maybe she hid her liberalism well.
Like James "the old mouth from the south" Carville, Donna Brazille and Mitch "the bitch" Landrieu, she's an embarassment to Louisiana.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
6134 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:39 am to
quote:

founded by Mike Pence.


did any of you honestly think he would turn into the POS that he has?
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
1657 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:40 am to
I’m the worlds tallest midget
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
6134 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:43 am to
quote:

she isn’t and is progressively sliding left


she always has been, she just hid it well. She is a woman. Feelings, etc. These types of positions aren't made for "feelings". I am very disappointed in her. However, just look at the 3 stooges on the left that sit on the court. They are all 100% progressive.....and the wise latino is probably the dumbest person to ever sit on the court......but Jackson is giving her a run for that title.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
60007 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:44 am to
quote:

NR is correct.


No they aren’t.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
6134 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:47 am to
quote:

The criticism of ACB is that she is not a partisan, not that she is not a conservative.


no it isn't....the criticism of her is that she is a woman, and like many others, governs with "feelings".
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6151 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:47 am to
She is only a symptom. Until we can somehow lessen the impact of huge money that has no effective connection to this country's welfare to our political process, we're fricked. Trump is likely a once-in-a-lifetime sort whose ego is too big to be bought. When he's gone, the same machine is still sitting there in DC, eating away at our nation. They're just biding their time.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
5257 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:57 am to
quote:

You’re right. NR reveals itself as Conservative, not as Populist.


so squishy GOPe assholes
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
24624 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 7:01 am to
horseshite.

She is a disaster.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
17011 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 7:03 am to
quote:

and the wise latino is probably the dumbest person to ever sit on the court......but Jackson is giving her a run for that title.

Because they were smart enough to realize that intelligent people are more likely to objectively review facts and make independent decisions.

Lower IQ people given authority are more likely to make rubber stamp decisions so they can be rewarded with a pat on the head (positive reinforcement).

So they appoint dumb ideologues who they can control with positive reinforcement and the end result is nearly 100% consistent voting records.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram