- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

GOP to Claw Back Biden’s Climate Law to Fund Trump Tax Cuts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:44 am
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:44 am
LINK
quote:
US House Republicans plan to help pay for an extension of President Donald Trump’s massive tax cuts by clawing back unused funds from scores of programs and grants in his predecessor’s signature climate law.
quote:
Billions of dollars allocated under former President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act would be rescinded under a portion of Trump’s sweeping tax package released by a key House committee on Sunday. That includes funds channeled to the Energy Department’s $400 billion green bank loan program, and to industrial facilities to help lower their greenhouse gas emissions, according to a GOP summary of the House energy and commerce committee’s portion of the bill.
“The legislation would reverse the most reckless parts of the engorged climate spending in the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act, returning $6.5 billion in unspent funds,” Representative Brett Guthrie, a Kentucky Republican who chairs the committee, wrote in the Wall Street Journal on Sunday.
The Republican plan also calls for revoking unused funds from more than a dozen divisions within the Energy Department. The Office of Minority Economic Impact, which helps minorities compete for agency grants and contracts, would see nearly $2.8 billion pulled, while the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, which has funded technological research in projects like plug-in electric trucks, would lose $402 million. Unspent EPA grants for electric trucks, environmental justice, reducing air pollution at schools, and other programs would also be rescinded.
The bill, which is almost certain to be changed by the Senate if it passes the House, would also repeal auto pollution and fuel economy standards, which were finalized by the Biden administration last year, and delay by 10 years the collection of a fee on methane emissions from oil and gas producers.
The legislation would also include $2 billion to help shore up the nation’s depleted Strategic Petroleum Reserve and mandate the Energy Department automatically approve applications to export liquefied natural gas to those that pay a $1 million fee.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:46 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
What is exactly meant by
"Funding" tax cuts?
"Funding" tax cuts?
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:06 am to Snipe
quote:to the CBO tax cuts are an increase in spending thus you need offsets otherwise they will declare "Trump is increasing spending, he lied" when it really is bookkeeping exercise because they are tax cuts against estimated growth.
What is exactly meant by
"Funding" tax cuts?
Furthermore, tax increases are "spending cuts" and is why the RINOs and Dems claim they cut the deficit when they are actually just raising taxes.
To make it worse, they'll use a much higher GDP to estimate against when it is tax increases, much lower when tax cuts.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:09 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Hopefully this will end carbon capture
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
First of all you don't have to pay for tax cuts.
But, if you are going to cut spending at the same time it's a win win.
But, if you are going to cut spending at the same time it's a win win.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:21 am to I20goon
Remember when Bill Clinton called new taxes "investments"?
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:22 am to Snipe
quote:
What is exactly meant by
"Funding" tax cuts?
ETA: it just reads really funny to me when it's written out like this. I get your point though.
This post was edited on 5/12/25 at 10:24 am
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:25 am to Snipe
quote:
What is exactly meant by "Funding" tax cuts?
No sh!t
Never except their reengineering of the vernacular
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:46 am to I20goon
quote:
to the CBO tax cuts are an increase in spending thus you need offsets otherwise they will declare "Trump is increasing spending, he lied" when it really is bookkeeping exercise because they are tax cuts against estimated growth.
A reminder that most of Biden’s trillion dollar bills were not “increases in spending” because he has the payments hit the debt books over the next ten years.
That’s why we’re fricked
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:14 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Johnson will promise to start first thing after midterms.
Popular
Back to top

4








