- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Judge Blocks Warrantless Border Patrol Stops
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:12 pm
A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting Border Patrol agents from conducting warrantless immigration stops or arrests without proper justification in a large portion of California. Specifically, in the state's Eastern District, which spans from Redding to Bakersfield
U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston ruled that agents may not stop individuals without reasonable suspicion of immigration violations and may not arrest them without a warrant unless there is a specific reason to believe the person might flee. "You just can't walk up to people with brown skin and say, 'Give me your papers,'" she said during a hearing reported by Cal Matters.
Court filings showed that the January raid, known as "Operation Return to Sender," resulted in the detention of 78 individuals, 77 of whom had no known immigration or criminal history. Witnesses described aggressive tactics and coercion, including forcing people to sign documents waiving their rights. The ACLU alleges that at least 40 people, including longtime U.S. residents, were removed from the country without due process and are currently stranded in Mexico.
The ACLU, along with United Farm Workers and several individuals, filed the lawsuit back in February to halt what they described as unlawful racial profiling and unconstitutional arrests. "They stopped us because we look Latino or like farmworkers," said Maria Hernandez Espinoza, a plaintiff who had lived in the U.S. for 20 years before being deported. "I hope our rights are protected so that all workers can work and live in peace." LINK
U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston ruled that agents may not stop individuals without reasonable suspicion of immigration violations and may not arrest them without a warrant unless there is a specific reason to believe the person might flee. "You just can't walk up to people with brown skin and say, 'Give me your papers,'" she said during a hearing reported by Cal Matters.
Court filings showed that the January raid, known as "Operation Return to Sender," resulted in the detention of 78 individuals, 77 of whom had no known immigration or criminal history. Witnesses described aggressive tactics and coercion, including forcing people to sign documents waiving their rights. The ACLU alleges that at least 40 people, including longtime U.S. residents, were removed from the country without due process and are currently stranded in Mexico.
The ACLU, along with United Farm Workers and several individuals, filed the lawsuit back in February to halt what they described as unlawful racial profiling and unconstitutional arrests. "They stopped us because we look Latino or like farmworkers," said Maria Hernandez Espinoza, a plaintiff who had lived in the U.S. for 20 years before being deported. "I hope our rights are protected so that all workers can work and live in peace." LINK
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:12 pm to Jbird
Another DS asset self-identified.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:13 pm to Jbird
We have a thread on this on the first page. It is active.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:15 pm to Jbird
quote:
U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston ruled that agents may not stop individuals without reasonable suspicion of immigration violations and may not arrest them without a warrant unless there is a specific reason to believe the person might flee.
Utter horse crap. She just rewrote 100 years of Supreme Court rulings as they relate to police detention of individuals.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:17 pm to Jbird
Is this area within the "100-Mile" distance from any US border that the USSC has already ruling that warrantless searches can be made?


Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:26 pm to prouddawg
quote:
Utter horse crap. She just rewrote 100 years of Supreme Court rulings as they relate to police detention of individuals.
So Probable Cause goes out the back door?
Trump should just ignore this crap and force that long ballyhooed "Constitutional Crisis". Make Roberts do his job and put ACB on record for turning the heathen loose on our God-worshiping (Constitutional Republic) citizenry, as defined in the Declaration of Independence.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:27 pm to Jbird
All the years citizens have been bitching about this and nothing. But let some fricking illegals get inconvenienced..
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:29 pm to prouddawg
No lawfare folks. All normal.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:34 pm to Jbird
quote:
"They stopped us because we look Latino or like farmworkers," said Maria Hernandez Espinoza
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:37 pm to Jbird
quote:
that agents may not stop individuals without reasonable suspicion of immigration violations
If you see someone running north from the border, would that not be reasonable suspicion?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:39 pm to Jbird
quote:
may not arrest them without a warrant unless there is a specific reason to believe the person might flee.
This has been long established by SCOTUS that warrantless arrests are legal, when it's likely a person may flee before you can return with a warrant. It's why 95+% of all arrests in the country are warrantless.
So this changes....absolutely nothing.
quote:
U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston ruled that agents may not stop individuals without reasonable suspicion of immigration violations
That's always been the case. You need reasonable suspicion to detain/vehicle stop someone (unless you're at a BP checkpoint)- for police and Border Patrol. Again, it changes nothing.
This post was edited on 4/30/25 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:40 pm to Jbird
It's actually good afternoon entertainment on the commute home. 7 or 8 local LE and CBP vehicles surrounding a vehicle. I can only imagine how destroyed the vehicle is after searching. Usually see 1 every few weeks
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:43 pm to deeprig9
quote:
a plaintiff who had lived in the U.S. for 20 years before being deported. "I hope our rights are protected so that all workers can work and live in peace."
Well why were you deported senorita?
Posted on 4/30/25 at 1:43 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
Is this area within the "100-Mile" distance from any US border that the USSC has already ruling that warrantless searches can be made?
Well, you're conflating searches and seizures. You can do warrantless searches at what's called the "functional equivalent of the border" at checkpoints, which are usually within 100 miles of the border. But you still need to be at the border itself or a checkpoint. It's not like BP can just start going through your bags on the side of the road 94 miles inland, not without probable cause.
I was a Border Patrol agent for over a decade. I should probably do an AMA one of these days. Customs authority is extremely complex and misunderstood.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 2:05 pm to Jbird
Just sign a nation wide warrant to cover every non citizen.
or just fire a few warning shots.
or just fire a few warning shots.
Posted on 4/30/25 at 2:14 pm to Jbird
This is the immigration equivalent of "stop and frisk", which has been held to be constitutional.
frick this judge.
frick this judge.
Popular
Back to top
11









