- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Attn: @Augustus516 @jizzle6609 and all the other sheep regarding Hegseth
Posted on 4/21/25 at 8:41 am
Posted on 4/21/25 at 8:41 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 4/21/25 at 8:44 am
6
Posted on 4/21/25 at 8:41 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 4/20/25 STATEMENT: Another day, another old story—back from the dead. The Trump-hating media continues to be obsessed with destroying anyone committed to President Trump’s agenda. This time, the New York Times — and all other Fake News that repeat their garbage — are enthusiastically taking the grievances of disgruntled former employees as the sole sources for their article. They relied only on the words of people who were fired this week and appear to have a motive to sabotage the Secretary and the President's agenda. There was no classified information in any Signal chat, no matter how many ways they try to write the story. What is true is that the Office of the Secretary of Defense is continuing to become stronger and more efficient in executing President Trump's agenda. We’ve already achieved so much for the American warfighter, and will never back down.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 8:45 am to jbdawgs03
Cant wait to see which shiny new object your media overlords hook you with next week when Hegseth is still in place
Posted on 4/21/25 at 8:47 am to jbdawgs03
This is so confusing. Those conservatives are so good at pretending to be concerned I don’t know what to believe anymore 
Posted on 4/21/25 at 8:48 am to jbdawgs03
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:16 am to jbdawgs03
It is astounding.
Transexuals were allowed years of pay. While the ones kicked out do to covid and not loyal to Biden-- are not offered much.
So if anything the left should be happy but they want Hegseth gone.
They won't be happy with anyone but a Lloyd Austin.
Transexuals were allowed years of pay. While the ones kicked out do to covid and not loyal to Biden-- are not offered much.
So if anything the left should be happy but they want Hegseth gone.
They won't be happy with anyone but a Lloyd Austin.
This post was edited on 4/21/25 at 9:19 am
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:18 am to jbdawgs03
I posted that this morning in the original thread about this and managed to get half a dozen down votes, so who the hell knows anymore?
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:24 am to VoxDawg
Board bring flooded with bots and OT bros
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:29 am to jbdawgs03
quote:
There was no classified information in any Signal chat
Definitely not a denial of the facts of the story. Sounds like we’re at the “if he did do it, it’s not a big deal stage.”
This post was edited on 4/21/25 at 9:54 am
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:35 am to jbdawgs03
I don’t think anyine believes there was Classified information divulged in the Signal chats. We learned from 2 administrations ago that classification of documents is a process, not an opinion.
In other words, Trump could tell Putin that he is about to attack China, does not make this information classified…but it would call into question his judgement.
Why are the administration officials not questioning Hegseth’s judgement in discussing all this information with different folks not in the need-to-know?
In other words, Trump could tell Putin that he is about to attack China, does not make this information classified…but it would call into question his judgement.
Why are the administration officials not questioning Hegseth’s judgement in discussing all this information with different folks not in the need-to-know?
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:35 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
facts of the story.
What do you think those are?
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:47 am to BBONDS25
quote:
What do you think those are?
That he shared details of the Yemeni attack (similar in nature to the details he butt-texted to the journalist) with his wife, brother and others. I probably should’ve used allegations instead of facts.
Even if we accept the argument that no “classified” info was included. That info should have at least been controlled and shouldn’t be shared with people without a need to know. You know, like in the family group chat.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:49 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
That he shared details of the Yemeni attack (similar in nature to the details he butt-texted to the journalist) with his wife, brother and others. I probably should’ve used allegations instead of facts.
There is zero evidence to suggest this is true. Just NYT “sources.” That is not a very reliable source and have been caught red-handed publishing fake news over and over.
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:50 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
That he shared details of the Yemeni attack (similar in nature to the details he butt-texted to the journalist) with his wife, brother and others.
So classified info?
You can’t have it both ways.
He either shared classified info (which is what you are claiming…based solely off of allegations made by people that were shite-canned (probably colluding with each other no less),
Or…it wasn’t classified.
I see that you are doubling down on the (false?) allegations.
Why?
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:51 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
That info should have at least been controlled
Information is controlled through the classification system, so if classified information wasn't shared then your argument falls all to pieces....
This post was edited on 4/21/25 at 9:53 am
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:52 am to jbdawgs03
The media apparatus is attacking them every single day over every single decision.
And a lot of people eat it up.
Yelling fascism while calling for the assassination of their perceived dictator.
Where was this guys due process?
Joe Biden admin went to a guys house and murdered him over an online post.
And a lot of people eat it up.
Yelling fascism while calling for the assassination of their perceived dictator.
quote:
PROVO, Utah (AP) — An armed Utah man accused of making violent threats against President Joe Biden was shot and killed by FBI agents hours before the president landed in the state Wednesday, authorities said.
Where was this guys due process?
quote:
Robertson posted online Monday that he had heard Biden was coming to Utah and he was planning to dig out a camouflage suit and begin “cleaning the dust off the M24 sniper rifle,”
Joe Biden admin went to a guys house and murdered him over an online post.
quote:
Neighbors described Robertson as a frail, elderly man — his online profile put his age as 74 — who walked with the aid of a hand-carved stick.
This post was edited on 4/21/25 at 9:56 am
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:52 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Sounds like we’re at the “if he did so it, it’s not a big deal stage.”
I just read a Twitter post. I think some MAGA folks have already moved to ‘this was intentional to weed out the leakers.”
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:52 am to redneck hippie
You’ll bitch regardless
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:53 am to Augustus516
quote:
Why are the administration officials not questioning Hegseth’s judgement in discussing all this information with different folks not in the need-to-know?
Uh, I dont know, perhaps because it never happened????
Posted on 4/21/25 at 9:55 am to The Maj
quote:
Information is controlled through the classification system
CUI is controlled unclassified information.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News