Will DOGE indirectly help with election security?

They already are in indirect ways but election security will be addressed prior to midterms I guarantee you.

If Lakesha ain’t getting her paper, she ain’t gonna be stuffing ballots.

If, as alleged, some USAID money was making it to Soros' program that funded the campaigns of his preferred progressive prosectors (or to other groups that then redistributed it to the Soros cause), it should make a difference.

Campaign finance has both direct and indirect effects on elections. Technically, it has nothing to do with actual voter rolls and security of ballots, making it indirect. But it plays an outsized roll in keeping a candidate's name in the minds of voters, it buys media influence, and funds public perception. Thus, it directly provides cover for weak candidates... exactly as the Democrat machine (politicians, media, Hollywood, intel agancies) tried to make Kamala look more popular and viable than she really was.

If DOGE did find actual evidence of this and shuts the spigot of money off by:
1) shutting down of money access to certain dubious causes like BLM
2) enforcing the coding of where money goes and why

... it might make a huge difference in the next election or two. Right now, it's all speculation and impossible to testify to DOGE's findings, but I'm hopeful based on the reporting that's come out so far.