Started By
Message
locked post

Fed Employees being paid for not working

Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:26 pm
Posted by Chazreinhold
Utah
Member since Oct 2020
7228 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:26 pm
What is the rationale behind the Trump Administration's decision to pay federal employees 8 to 9 months of salary while they are not working—especially those who already had planned to retire or resign—and why is this benefit being offered before mandating a return to the office and laying off employees during their probationary period?

Is it because there is some sort of Law on the books protecting them?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
73075 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:27 pm to
It's common in the private sector.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
42979 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:28 pm to
They are so hard to fire you have to incentivize them to quit.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
31556 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

What is the rationale behind the Trump Administration's decision to pay federal employees 8 to 9 months of salary while they are not working
trying to encourage them to quit

those that were gonna retire soon anyway get a little extra bonus; but that's ok if we get enough of the others to just walk away

it will save tremendous $$ in the long term
Posted by Jellyham
Member since Dec 2019
447 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:29 pm to
He is trying to get them to quit. Someone that is thinking about quitting is more likely to take advantage of being paid for several months. In the end it works out for everyone. They get the courage to quit and the Government saves a lot of money in the long run.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56162 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

What is the rationale behind the Trump Administration's decision to pay federal employees 8 to 9 months of salary while they are not working—especially those who already had planned to retire or resign—and why is this benefit being offered before mandating a return to the office and laying off employees during their probationary period?

Is it because there is some sort of Law on the books protecting them?


A lot of gov employees put in many years

so when you are kinda wanting to flip the culture, you offer a life line of time so they can pay their bills and find that next job and not create a ton of ill out the door

If you offered nothing, then most would stay and we need many that want to leave to go on and leave
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
70619 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:32 pm to
Planned obsolescence.
Posted by Chazreinhold
Utah
Member since Oct 2020
7228 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:32 pm to
Thanks. That does make sense.

Great responses here..
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
5063 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:40 pm to
Being paid for not doing any work is basically 90% of government jobs anyway.
Posted by Knartfocker
Member since Jun 2020
1656 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:42 pm to
Fiscal year ends in September, iirc. Those salaries are all guaranteed through the FY if I remember government finances correctly
Posted by CrotchetyCowboy
Ward, AR
Member since Jul 2022
779 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:49 pm to
This. Congress hass already appropriated the funds.
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
18965 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

it will save tremendous $$ in the long term


Are you stupid? DOD is going through this as well, promoting civilians to quit, we will pay for no productivity for 8 months and then struggle to hire all the open spots back on 1 October. These are required authorized positions built into manpower models making these orgs run. Orginizations that are already undermanned
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
19144 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 1:57 pm to
It’s like severance. You agree to resign and take the payout. If you just fire them there will be thousands of wrongful termination suits and legal battles.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
31556 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Are you stupid?
no, but apparently you are - there are some exemptions (particularly in sensitive areas)

Downsizing the number of federal employees is a good thing
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
18965 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

no, but apparently you are - there are some exemptions (particularly in sensitive areas)


No shite? And not sitting the areas I listed you stupid twat. The board experts spitting shite they know nothing about as if they are experts is really old
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20484 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Is it because there is some sort of Law on the books protecting them?


Most likely.

Normally, if a person resigns or retires, they can't do so and stick around for eight months (even if a person tells everyone "I'm retiring at year end", they usually wait until 1-2 months before they actually leave to file the paperwork).

The only ones who can be forced out immediately are those who are in their probationary period (they can be let go for any reason or no reason), those who've been placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) but who haven't improved (this does happen), or if there's evidence of misconduct (such as security violations, but even then they are usually "on administrative leave" while the matter is being investigated).
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

it will save tremendous $$ in the long term




The frick it will.
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
10137 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Are you stupid? DOD is going through this as well, promoting civilians to quit, we will pay for no productivity for 8 months and then struggle to hire all the open spots back on 1 October. These are required authorized positions built into manpower models making these orgs run. Orginizations that are already undermanned

We already are.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
7556 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

we will pay for no productivity for 8 months and then struggle to hire all the open spots back on 1 October.


Who's gonna tell him?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/1/25 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Who's gonna tell him?


Go ahead and tell him.

Let's see how little you know about any of this.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram