- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The DNC is for men under 5’8” and women over 280
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:19 am to NashvilleTider
while not exactly encyclopedic, he is approaching a conversational truism.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:20 am to ChineseBandit58
I dunno man...I know a ton of Coonass men under '5"8 (I am one), and not one voted for Kamala!
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:20 am to NashvilleTider
An FBI agent wrote a book about the Clinton White House. He said the Bush people were more in-shape, athletic types, while the Clinton people were mannish women and soft men.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:22 am to NashvilleTider
Schulz ain't exactly a conservative. Says a ton about how crazy the DNC has gotten, and how close they are to blowing a 3-0 lead in the culture wars.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:29 am to NashvilleTider
Well that was a waste of a minute
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:29 am to NashvilleTider
If either of these were true, Louisiana would be as blue as NYC
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:32 am to jrobic4
quote:
I dunno man...I know a ton of Coonass men under '5"8 (I am one), and not one voted for Kamala!
You’re reading it wrong. He didn’t say guys that are under 5’-8” are democrats. He said he didn’t know a dude that was 6-4” with a job that was a democrat.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:32 am to Jorts R Us
And yet you wasted another minute typing your feelings
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:33 am to Nosevens
quote:
And yet you wasted another minute typing your feelings
Like another 20 seconds. Worth it since it made you respond. Emotionally respond.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 9:34 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:37 am to Jorts R Us
Responding ? I was applauding your comic thoughts and the insight of your stupidity and now it’s duplicitous. I mean you’re bitching about wasting time I wasn’t as I read nonsense like yours whilst I take a crap. Seems redundant it you think about
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:39 am to Nosevens
quote:
Responding ? I was applauding your comic thoughts and the insight of your stupidity and now it’s duplicitous. I mean you’re bitching about wasting time I wasn’t as I read nonsense like yours whilst I take a crap. Seems redundant it you think about
I'm happy for you or sorry it happened. Whichever.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:42 am to NashvilleTider
Doesn’t it always seem like liberal “men” are tall and rail thin? Or puffy marshmallows with facial mange?
Pasty white. Glasses. Effeminate.
I don’t see the short guy thing.
Unattractive people is the norm for leftist outside Hollywood.
Pasty white. Glasses. Effeminate.
I don’t see the short guy thing.
Unattractive people is the norm for leftist outside Hollywood.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:43 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
An FBI agent wrote a book about the Clinton White House. He said the Bush people were more in-shape, athletic types, while the Clinton people were mannish women and soft men.
I’d always wondered why Clinton didn’t have his affairs with more attractive women, but I guess none were around.
Popular
Back to top
